Worshipping a sand god is the ultimate cuck - No white person on the planet can possibly justify being a christcuck

[snailslime]

If you’re open to heresy, I have done some contemplating having read about older religions and the Old Testament

Spoiler: Heresy Time

I suspect that a lot of religions, especially in areas with Indo-Europeans are connected and have similar roots. Just they ended up separating over time, gained or changed doctrines, and evolved with their societies. I’m doing my best to simplify this as much as possible… From Hinduism to the Greek Pantheon to Christianity, there is a shared religious heritage thanks to their common ancestors.

There are notable parallels between some of the gods like Zeus & Baal, notably they’re storm and fertility gods. A number of scholars agree that the two are often connected. Cows are often associated with them. Cows are also regular fixtures in Indo-European religion, most notably in Hinduism but often pop up in the symbology of the Old Testament.

Set is also a storm god and a god of “foreigners” so I suspect that his worship was introduced by nomadic Indo-Europeans and we know Baal was worshipped in Egypt at one point in time. Worship of Baal was also spread throughout North Africa by the Phoenicians and I suspect that Baal worship was reintroduced multiple times over the centuries.

Baal was once indistinguishable and shared titles with the Jewish deity we call God. Some evidence of this is shown in their names. Baal was once a common compound of Jewish names. The judge Gideon was named Jerrubaal, and so were a number of other old testament figures. Due to Jezebel being an annoying slut as well as religious divisions, caused the Jews to replace names compounded with -baal to -boshet or shame.

There are some other parallels. One for example is how Baal would often struggle with the god of death and stagnancy. If he succeeded there’d be seven years of prosperity but if he failed there’s be seven years of drought. We can see parallels with Joseph’s dream of the 7 fat cows and 7 skinny/dead cows.

And I could go on.

TLDR indo-European religions from Hinduism to Christianity have shared roots.

Judaism has no connection to cows at all. And the Hebrew name for G-d isn't even close to Baal.

Baal was the god that the Israelites worshipped when they went astray.

 

[Mothra1988]

yeah but christianity came from the middle east and not europe.

Wow such deep insight from the sticker poster. lol

 

[Isaac]

Why can't I be Christian and Racist? Our ancestors did it like the Spanish. They made Christian Mexicans so I stand by my point of being racist but still race mixing.

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."
Galatians 3:28

Most of the conquistadors are probably in Hell, along with the Popes that sanctioned their conquests.

 

[Kabuki Actor]

yeah but christianity came from the middle east and not europe.

It came from the Roman Empire.

 

[snailslime]

It came from the Roman Empire.

yeah, which was mainly a crossroads of the middle east during that time.

 

[b0o0pinsn0o0tz]

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."
Galatians 3:28

Neither Male or Female? Stay the fuck away from children you tranny freak.

 

[Mothra1988]

yeah, which was mainly a crossroads of the middle east during that time.

Judea was literally part of the Roman empire, you know like Britain. lol

 

[snailslime]

Judea was literally part of the Roman empire, you know like Britain. lol

Is it in the middle east or is it not?

 

[Mothra1988]

Is it in the middle east or is it not?

Describing the Roman Empire as a "crossroads" for the Middle East in this context makes no sense. It would be like saying Washington DC is a crossroads for Texas. Also the guy who made Chrstianity the official state religion really started his career in Europe and Britain.

 

[snailslime]

Describing the Roman Empire as a "crossroads" for the Middle East in this context makes no sense. It would be like saying Washington DC is a crossroads for Texas. Also the guy who made Chrstianity the official state religion really started his career in Europe and Britain.

Is Judea in the Middle East or not? Hint: look at a map.

 

[Mothra1988]

Is Judea in the Middle East or not? Hint: look at a map.

This is such a stupid hill to die on. Are you aware of what Proto-Indio-European Mythology is? Are you aware of the fact that supposedly "Nordic" Norse gods are believed to be copied directly from other gods that come from this historical lineage that is descended from source mythology that came from outside Europe? The oldest and most important precursor of younger related mythologies is vedic mythology, which predates Norse gods. For example, the vedic equivalent of Thor is Parjanya, another thunder lightning god. Where did vedic mythology come from, snailslime? Well, it comes from northwest India.

Is India in Europe or not? Hint: look at a map.

 

[snailslime]

This is such a stupid hill to die on. Are you aware of what Proto-Indio-European Mythology is? Are you aware of the fact that supposedly "Nordic" Norse gods are believed to be copied directly from other gods that come from this historical lineage that is descended from source mythology that came from outside Europe? The oldest and most important precursor of younger related mythologies is vedic mythology, which predates Norse gods. For example, the vedic equivalent of Thor is Parjanya, another thunder lightning god. Where did vedic mythology come from, snailslime? Well, it comes from northwest India.

Is India in Europe or not? Hint: look at a map.

We are talking about Christianity, not European paganism.

You just wish that you could claim the work of non-European civilizations.

 

[Homophobic white dog]

You need to do more reading about religion I guess. It's Wikipedia, but it's a good over-view of the history of sacrifice, which has existed on all continents irregardless of culture for a reason I think:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrifice

You seem to have some confusion regarding the Christian religion versus Old Testament Judaism. Christianity is based on a new covenant with God that includes gentiles. The intent of Jesus is pretty clear in the Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen in which he predicted the Pharisees were going to kill him. That parable in particular is about Jews fucking up so much over history that the covenant was going to be changed to parties beyond them after they killed God's son. Also the covenant with Abraham was not the first one, the one with Noah precedes it, and Old Testament prophets also prophesied the coming a new covenant that would supersede what came before.

I know what a sacrifice is, and the 'sacrifice' of Christ on the cross has basically nothing to do with regular animal or even human sacrifice throughout history.
At best, do you know what it's like? The chickens the Jews kill on the eve of Yom Kippur, to send their sins on them. This is the level of superstition you're stuck with.

And no, there's nothing of the Old Testament that says that the arrival of the messiah would lead to a new covenant, in fact, if we remain within Christian literature itself, it's stated that

1) Christ didn't come to abolish the Torah, but to fullfill it (Matthew 5:17). In fact, his beef with the Pharisees was not that they observed the Torah, but that they were not honest about it, that it was a surface level observation (rant at Matthew 23).
2) that Christ came for the "Lost sheep of Israel", not for gentiles (The episode of the woman in Qana in Matthew 15. At 23 he ignores the woman begging him to expel a demon from his daughter, which prompts his guys to beg him to do something. He replies at 24 that he came "For the lost sheep of Israel", that is to say to take the Jews from the Pharisees and Sadducees essentially, and when the woman thanks him, he compares gentiles taking advantage of his teachings to dogs eating the crumbs at the table of the master. The ones who get the full meal here are the Jews, you Christian gentiles are dogs eating crumbs).
3) God never broke or suspended or for that matter even completed the covenant with the Jews, because in Romans 1 11 it is said that the hearts of Israel have been hardened on purpose, to show the gentiles how not to behave, and at 11:27-28 it's said, clearly,

and in this way[e] all Israel will be saved. As it is written:

“The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27 And this is[f] my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”[g]

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30 Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now[h] receive mercy as a result of God’s mercy to you. 32 For God has bound everyone over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all."

Note that by Romans 1 it was already established that gentiles would play a part, but judging by Christ's own words in the Gospels themselves, the inclusion of gentiles was an afterthought by the early Christian community to say the least, but even then, the covenant with Israel stands, they only have their part to play, and while the gentiles who reject Christ will burn in Hell, the Israelites who reject him still end up saved IN SPITE of their disbelief. And do you know why?
Because you gentiles are dogs eating crumbs at the table of the master, but I don't want to be a dog eating anyone's crumbs.
By Biblical standards, you Christians, you idolatrous cross-worshippers, are at best second-rate faithful, God still loves the Heebs the most, in spite of their disbelief.
It wouldn't even be the first time he hardens hearts for the sake of making a point, the Pharaoh's heart was hardened just so God could fuck up Egypt and flex on the Jews how much he was on their side, to what extent he could go to save them, if they remained faithful.

 

[Shidoen]

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."
Galatians 3:28

Most of the conquistadors are probably in Hell, along with the Popes that sanctioned their conquests.

To be fair the conquistadors were badass especially going against a large nation of warriors. The whole thing interests me in general.

 

[Shidoen]

We are talking about Christianity, not European paganism.

You just wish that you could claim the work of non-European civilizations.

That’s also something I hate, literally every modern society based aspects from older civilizations. Why can’t people just say Christ helped develop Europe instead of trying to claim Christ as their own.

 

[snailslime]

That’s also something I hate, literally every modern society based aspects from older civilizations. Why can’t people just say Christ helped develop Europe instead of trying to claim Christ as their own.

European we wuzzing is just as funny as black we wuzzing

 

[Homophobic white dog]

Christ didn't help develop Europe, Christianity did, for better or worse and it'd be asinine to think that Christianity only did evil. Like I said, the crumbs that gentile dogs are left with.
If you're ok being the dogs, good for you, personally I reject this, no rancor or hard feelings.

Said this, paganism, especially in its entirely reconstructionist aspect, remains a larp. You want an Indoeuropean living faith, look up Hinduism and Buddhism, and yes by the way you can easily recontextualize their idols in the context of the ones worshipped by your ancestors if it's so important to you, as religions they're nothing if not open to syncretism.
Tibetan Buddhism's cultural hummus is especially local, local spirits the Tibetans pray to are said to have converted to Buddhism, and in Bali the cultural hummus is Indonesian as much as it's Indian, so yeah.

 

[Shidoen]

European we wuzzing is just as funny as black we wuzzing

Exactly. At least Europe doesn’t have a black guy with a big cranium making white people.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Why can't I be Christian and Racist? Are ancestors did it like the Spanish. They made Christian Mexicans so I stand by my point of being racist but still race mixing.

Because the Bible says all Christians are equal in Christ. That's part of why the Bible is bullshit because people aren't equal, but the Bible implies that if you're a Christian than you are equal. I find that disagreeable. We can discern that a better morality is that nations should worship different gods and use different rituals, but some rituals are so vile they should be eliminated (like what Caesar did to the druids). That's the same as how cultures work--tolerance to an extent is good, but some things should never be tolerated.

On the other hand, the Bible is clear that it's okay to discriminate against non-Christians as long as you're trying to make them Christian because saving them from eternal damnation is good. So what Spain did to the Moors, Jews, Native Americans, Filipinos, Protestants etc. is good according to Christianity. But as a whole the Bible is still a book for Jews and the Bible says that a based chad conquistador is equal to a literally retarded dirt-farming Mexican peasant who converted to Christianity which is pretty dumb. Actually if you read scripture both are going to hell for being Catholic lol.

Said this, paganism, especially in its entirely reconstructionist aspect, remains a larp. You want an Indoeuropean living faith, look up Hinduism and Buddhism, and yes by the way you can easily recontextualize their idols in the context of the ones worshipped by your ancestors if it's so important to you, as religions they're nothing if not open to syncretism.
Tibetan Buddhism's cultural hummus is especially local, local spirits the Tibetans pray to are said to have converted to Buddhism, and in Bali the cultural hummus is Indonesian as much as it's Indian, so yeah.

Yeah, that's what sucks about paganism, it's a dead religion and all you can do is read about what it was probably like.

 

[Mothra1988]

I know what a sacrifice is, and the 'sacrifice' of Christ on the cross has basically nothing to do with regular animal or even human sacrifice throughout history.
At best, do you know what it's like? The chickens the Jews kill on the eve of Yom Kippur, to send their sins on them. This is the level of superstition you're stuck with.

It's the blood sacrifice of God in human form. This is not hard to understand why it would be so meaningful or powerful.

And no, there's nothing of the Old Testament that says that the arrival of the messiah would lead to a new covenant, in fact, if we remain within Christian literature itself, it's stated that

There's quotes in the Old Testament prophesying the coming of a new covenant and some others at least alluding to it. I'm not going to spoon feed you, but I'm sure you'll bicker over what those refer to. But irregardless, they are there.

In fact, his beef with the Pharisees was not that they observed the Torah, but that they were not honest about it, that it was a surface level observation (rant at Matthew 23).
2) that Christ came for the "Lost sheep of Israel", not for gentiles (The episode of the woman in Qana in Matthew 15. At 23 he ignores the woman begging him to expel a demon from his daughter, which prompts his guys to beg him to do something. He replies at 24 that he came "For the lost sheep of Israel", that is to say to take the Jews from the Pharisees and Sadducees essentially, and when the woman thanks him, he compares gentiles taking advantage of his teachings to dogs eating at the crumbs of the master. The ones who get the full meal here are the Jews, you are dogs eating crumbs).
3) God never broke or suspended or for that matter even completed the covenant with the Jews, because in Romans 1 11 it is said that the hearts of Israel have been hardened on purpose, to show the gentiles how not to behave, and at 11:27-28 it's said, clearly,

Jesus definitely preached to non-Jews. This isn't disputed by anyone and he certainly adjusted to the fact the Jewish leaders rejected to him. Jesus was preforming an exercise to test that Canaanite's woman's faith. He was impressed by her faith and ended up healing her. You're missing the full context and it actually supports the complete opposite of your conclusions.

Jesus literally talks about making a new covenant during the Last Supper. The actions of the Jewish religious leaders precipitated this. This is, again, not hard to understand. Again read the Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen.

Note that by Romans 1 it was already established that gentiles would play a part, but judging by Christ's own words in the Gospels themselves, the inclusion of gentiles was an afterthought by the early Christian community to say the least, but even then, the covenant with Israel stands, they only have their part to play, and while the gentiles who reject Christ will burn in Hell, the Israelites who reject him still end up saved IN SPITE of their disbelief. And do you know why?

Jesus's intent is crystal clear that he is the the path to salvation. "I am the door. If anyone enters by me, he will be saved and will go in and out and find pasture." This is fundamental to the religion and not up for debate.

In Acts, rules regarding gentiles were literally hashed out by Jesus's own brother, Peter and Paul. James the Just was the leader of the Jewish-Christian camp and he sided with Peter and Paul on gentiles. Calling this an afterthought is stupid, considering the fact Jesus personally gave authority to Peter and the other apostles. The holy spirit worked through them in performing miracles, etc. This is not something that was just randomly decided hundreds of years later.

and while the gentiles who reject Christ will burn in Hell, the Israelites who reject him still end up saved IN SPITE of their disbelief. And do you know why?
Because you gentiles, well actually US GENTILES, are dogs eating crumbs at the table of the master, but I don't want to be a dog eating anyone's crumbs.
By Biblical standards, you Christians, you idolatrous cross-worshippers, are at best second-rate faithful, God still loves the Heebs the most, in spite of their disbelief.
It wouldn't even be the first time he hardens hearts for the sake of making a point, the Pharaoh's heart was hardened just so God could fuck up Egypt and flex on the Jews how much he was on their side, to what extent he could go to save them, if they remained faithful.

I initially wanted to take you seriously, but yet again, it appears you are driven by irrational juice hatred. Can't wait until this retarded meme ideology burns itself out for good, it's been repeatedly ramming itself into a brick wall for years in total obscurity. Hoping November will help move that process along. You literally can't have a conversation on imageboard-adjacent internet without someone spazzing out about the JUICEEEEEE.