- Joined
- May 21, 2015
Works for me. It probably won't update until later today though.
Inactive Nick Bate / Nickalaus B. Stoutzenberger - (Thread 3: JUDGEMENT DAY)
- Thread starter Karen Riley
- Start date
Works for me. It probably won't update until later today though.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
It just won't load up for me. Could it be because I'm a Britfag?
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
Most likely. I'm sure someone will post it in the thread once it's updated.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2015
Offline for me, too
That may be a reason, the Wayback Machine copy looked good. I'll try a proxy.
TopCat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
He was asked when he graduated high school and he said he couldn't remember but thought it was 2008 or 2009.
"
- Nick graduated high school, although he cannot recall the exact year. He thinks it was 2008 or 2009."
Offline for me, too
That's odd, it's working for me.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
Thank you everyone for the information. I don't want to be Aloggy or get off topic so I'll leave it at what you guys have said.
The website is coming up fine for me. Any kiwis that went today I'd really like to know if it's worth the drive. How easily do you think it was to get in?
i still feel as though if more had been done, maybe AO would've had help way sooner. Nick obviously needed more than just once a week group sessions and his social worker felt that way too
The website is coming up fine for me. Any kiwis that went today I'd really like to know if it's worth the drive. How easily do you think it was to get in?
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2015
To ensure everything I said checked out, I just went on a massive doc search through the Sarlacc Monster's public diarrhea that some traditionally call "social media accounts."
As for your first question, @Plague, the eval's been confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt. I couldn't find how it got posted, or even -- though Bate obviously had something to do with the leak -- who posted it. But on his Ask.fm page alonee, Bate confirms the eval is his at least five times, all of which I've capped for posterity:
Actually, the loony-bin trip you're thinking of happened in 2014. Bate tweeted about it when he came in, and got out:
Then wrote a Livejournal post about the whole thing:
There's also his Twitter activity to keep in mind. In the entire month of May 2013, which is when he had the eval, he never shuts the fuck up. But when his 2014-Super-Bowl-Week institutionalization came about, he went dark, which he never fucking does unless he's forcefully deprived from Internet access.
It's hard keeping all this depravity straight, and I blame no one for making the occasional detail mistake on this matter. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go find a more pleasurable activity than combing through Nick Bate's garbage. Maybe I'll pull my pubic hairs out with a set of wooden tweezers.
As for your first question, @Plague, the eval's been confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt. I couldn't find how it got posted, or even -- though Bate obviously had something to do with the leak -- who posted it. But on his Ask.fm page alonee, Bate confirms the eval is his at least five times, all of which I've capped for posterity:
Actually, the loony-bin trip you're thinking of happened in 2014. Bate tweeted about it when he came in, and got out:
Then wrote a Livejournal post about the whole thing:
There's also his Twitter activity to keep in mind. In the entire month of May 2013, which is when he had the eval, he never shuts the fuck up. But when his 2014-Super-Bowl-Week institutionalization came about, he went dark, which he never fucking does unless he's forcefully deprived from Internet access.
It's hard keeping all this depravity straight, and I blame no one for making the occasional detail mistake on this matter. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go find a more pleasurable activity than combing through Nick Bate's garbage. Maybe I'll pull my pubic hairs out with a set of wooden tweezers.
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2014
Re the court page, it's never worked for anyone outside the USA so it's either proxy's or caps.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2015
Awright, wait a lil, I'm gonna upload a PNG screencap of that page, mmkay?
- Joined
- May 27, 2013
Don't expect the docket to get updated right away. It could take up to a day for the results to be publicly posted. Kiwi court reporters will probably report the results before anything official is updated.
- Joined
- May 28, 2013
Godspeed, anybody there. I hope and pray for good reports and hopefully pictures. 
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I think the only reason it would be updated faster than we get reports (unless absolutely nobody showed up or something) is if nothing at all happened and they just immediately updated the docket to reflect that.
From the fact we haven't heard anything yet, probably something of substance is actually happening.
From the fact we haven't heard anything yet, probably something of substance is actually happening.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2015
I cannot wrap my head around his use of "aboot". Still cannot.
On well.
On well.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
No way in hell. Those are for nonviolent or minor offenders, not people facing near-capital penalties.
Also those are pretrial diversions so if he had any opportunity at that, it has probably passed.
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2014
"First offense" isn't what they show it to be on Law and Order SVU reruns, where someone does PCP and shoots up an office building and the attractive female ADA offers it up despite the fact it took two commercial breaks to clean up the blood.
"First Offense" would be a valid card to play after getting into a fender bender and leaving the scene. Nick ain't even in the ballpark for that stuff.
"First Offense" would be a valid card to play after getting into a fender bender and leaving the scene. Nick ain't even in the ballpark for that stuff.
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Huh, the result's in.
Lawfags what does aquittal nolle prosequi even mean? Is he going to prison?
Lawfags what does aquittal nolle prosequi even mean? Is he going to prison?
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
At first I thought maybe they didn't rate him lower because him playing with the feces was of sexual gratification and not lack of knowledge however combined with the fact that he doesn't shower I'm not sure how he got a thirty only. Even Nick stated the evaluation was lacking and they didn't go over everything. Maybe they couldn't stand smelling him for too long but they were neglect to say the least. I didn't know GAF wasn't used in the DSM anymore because it's used in NY? Interesting to say the least.
Thank you for this, it actually cleared up a lot.
I'm not a lawfag but it was a national holiday Monday so if it wasn't Friday it's today