Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Were the other 16 named Dontavious, LaQueesha or some such?
>9 minutes ago
She's live now, giving a briefing about her other new "good" idea called "Alyssa's Law"
It's a potential solution that doesn't involve gun grabbing, so I agree with it. I'm surprised Dems would sign such a law. They want more dead kids to grift off of.So that the police can stand outside and do nothing like they did in Parkland? Police not being notified wasn’t an issue there.
I still think they'll run Stacey the Hutt and then cry racism and try to label Republicans Russia backed Nazi terrorists or something. "The horror of this big bodied Nubian Kween not getting Her Turn is the most horrifying day for Our Democracy since the attempted Fascist genocide of January 6th!"Their next best option is to run Kamala and then scream misogyny and racism and pray that it works (it won't.)
The problem with both Stacy and Kamala is that black men hate them. The DNC has enough problems with black men getting slowly but surely red pilled; they don't need to give the blue pilled black men a reason to just stay home.I still think they'll run Stacey the Hutt and then cry racism and try to label Republicans Russia backed Nazi terrorists or something. "The horror of this big bodied Nubian Kween not getting Her Turn is the most horrifying day for Our Democracy since the attempted Fascist genocide of January 6th!"
That’s not an issue for them anymore. Biden “““earned””” more votes from black men than Obama.The problem with both Stacy and Kamala is that black men hate them. The DNC has enough problems with black men getting slowly but surely red pilled; they don't need to give the blue pulled black men a reason to just stay home.
Hochul's response is something.
View attachment 3417602
New York is the gift (or grift) that keeps on giving. Hopefully this time she can get the Supreme Court to repeal the SAFE Act.
Here he is! Definitely sounds more outraged than Hochul.I'm surprised Gavin Newsom hasn't responded since it will affect a lot of stuff here.
Give it time.I'm surprised Gavin Newsom hasn't responded since it will affect a lot of stuff here.
SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED. COPE AND SEETHE, FAGGOT.Here he is! Definitely sounds more outraged than Hochul.
View attachment 3417687
Or rather, keeping them from being shrunken down further than they already have. But hey - gotta take your victories where you can.Based SCOTUS expanding gun rights.
This seems.. much better? Schools and most other places mass shootings occur tend to be soft targets and they need to be hardened up. I have no problem with that. Certainly much better than making the average citizen a softer target.>9 minutes ago
She's live now, giving a briefing about her other new "good" idea called "Alyssa's Law"
How many people are killed by CCW holders every year where the deaths were not justified and in public?Here he is! Definitely sounds more outraged than Hochul.
View attachment 3417687
You would think NOT being a coward would be a prerequisite for getting a job in law enforcement.So that the police can stand outside and do nothing like they did in Parkland? Police not being notified wasn’t an issue there.
We just need to balkanize alreadyEven by Keith Olbermann standards this is great. Always remember that he quit his job at ESPN just so he could rage tweet all day.
View attachment 3417764
Sounds like an insurrectionEven by Keith Olbermann standards this is great. Always remember that he quit his job at ESPN just so he could rage tweet all day.
View attachment 3417764
No we need to just go back to ignoring these shrieking retards and make the limp dick portion of the country deal w/ the fact that some of us have functioning gonads that produce testosterone.We just need to balkanize already
Woah woah woah, I was promised a civil war first...We just need to balkanize already
Not necessarily. What it does is sets precedent that States cannot infringe on a law abiding citizens Second Amendment right to carry by introducing vague, arbitrary rules like "demonstrating a need" for self defense. I will say it was a clever attempt by the legislature of NY to shaft people applying to carry. How the fuck do you prove something like that? And then it's left up to the discretion of a legislature that has proven itself to be anti-gun.Does anyone know exactly how this works/will work? Is it essentially expanding constitutional carry to states like NY/CA?