Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
1656086792558.png

ba-dum-tsss-drum.gif
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Jackisnotaname, GhastlyGhost, Scarface1 and 43 others
LigmaTwatz said:
So who’s going to financially support the young girl and the baby? Have you not seen the statistics for kids adopted Vs unadopted? The kids not adopted get booted from the homes, and have a higher chance of drug abuse, homelessness, etc. after the baby is born, no one gives a shit about the kid or the woman that birthed it.
Click to expand...
I have many relatives who were adopted and who came from similar circumstances.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, Ira the Weatherman, Claus and 7 others
Von Wolf Demon said:
To review legislation created by the Congress or other government entities like state legislatures. If a GOP congress and president approve a national ban and pro-choicers sue over it, the Supreme Court will then have to determine the constitutionality of said law. If the Court decides it is constitutional, it will be the law of the land. I suspect that enough of the Supremes will allow their pro-life sentiments to overrule their "State's Rights" sentiments if that was the case.
Click to expand...
The Constitution can also be changed by adding new Amendments through a pair of processes, neither of which are easy.

If the Left truly wanted to Ban guns or make Abortion a right they have had decades to propose those Amendments.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Zaryiu2, Ira the Weatherman, Claus and 10 others
Feline Supremacist said:
I honestly don't understand these dangerhairs sperging, abortion is not ruled illegal, it just reverts to each state to legislate. Of course Congress could fix this, as Ginsburg advised them to, but they're too busy screaming into the wind.
Click to expand...
Wait a minute, doesn't gun laws vary from state to state? Now it's abortion that is left between the states? Shouldn't they both be federally protected?

That said, women's rights have gone the way of the dodo since feminism became radicalized.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, FunPosting101, Ira the Weatherman and 7 others
I remember back during the election I knew someone who would say that if you don't vote right you're racist and all about how Trump would take away abortion. I'd love to see the look on her face now, lmao. They really thought Biden would be able to save this for them somehow, lol.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Corette, Claus, DavidFerrie and 5 others
Android raptor said:
I'm already aware the reason men didn't want women to vote is because they wanted to keep being able to use them as broodmares instead of treating them like people.
Click to expand...
Actually the franchise was based upon military service and ownership of property. Women did not fight in wars or own property in many cases, thus they had no stake in civil discourse and could not vote.

It's disingenuous to say it's because "men just wanted fuck slaves". That is an incredibly myopic view of gender relations.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Pig Cups, Cowboy Kim, FunPosting101 and 37 others
The Last Stand said:
Wait a minute, doesn't gun laws vary from state to state? Now it's abortion that is left between the states? Shouldn't they both be federally protected?

That said, women's rights have gone the way of the dodo since feminism became radicalized.
Click to expand...
There's an amendment that says you can't infringe gun rights. There is no amendment in the constitution that says you have a right to an abortion.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Saturnalia-1918, Jackisnotaname, Aborto and 26 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back