Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Condolences to US Kiwis who may now find themselves unable to get abortions.

That said, I do now wish to use this as a stick to beat Tony with. As we've discussed previously, Tony is obsessed with appeals to authority and having those in power validate his beliefs. I suspect that it is killing him that the highest court in the land has explicitly rejected his demands for "bodily autonomy" free from any kind of restriction:
View attachment 3421213

Tony may have been a PhD candidate but his reading comprehension is seriously 99th-percentile dunce shit. He cites Thomas's concurrance as meaning that contraception and same-sex marriage are next, as if Thomas is riding one of horses of the apocalypse.
View attachment 3421250
I can't and won't comment on the politics of the court, but the reason why Thomas says that is because:
  • Those specific cases were cited in the case at hand;
  • Thomas disagrees with the "due process" argument (and repeatedly cites himself saying that in the past).
That's all a bit abstract, but taking a step back: Thomas's argument about "due process" is that it has been used as an arbitrary shield to give the protection of the constitution to things that cannot possibly be construed as being protected by the constitution.

And another step back: previous rulings used this device inappropriately in their decisions, effectively legislating from the bench, and so those decisions should be reviewed.

So what? Well, this is exactly the reasoning of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in overturning the High Court decision in Bell v Tavistock. Tony loves to cite the appeal judgement in Bell to, essentially, say: "The transphobes had a win but then some better judges came along and agreed with the trans!"

What actually happened is that the Court of Appeal said that the High Court had effectively legislated from the bench, using the power of the court to intervene in ways that are entirely inappropriate.

Honestly it just boggles my mind that Tony has spent the last 18 years trying to make himself out to be a political expert but he cares so little for actual politics. As in, changing things through majority support codified in new legislation, rather than relying on technocratic procedure.

Sorry, enough sperging from me, so picture time. He's making this stupid fucking argument still:
View attachment 3421331

And the absolute brass neck of straight white man Tony "Erin" Reed, of the "Don't like pink? You must be a boy!" Party saying this:
View attachment 3421339
This makes me wonder if Tony misunderstands the fundamental ideology of pro-choice folks. The key word is CHOICE. That's why it's not anti-abortion groups vs pro-abortion groups. Abigail Shrier's cover image is a reflection of a lack of options - a literal void where the young girl's future reproductive options would otherwise lay. This is why as a pro-choice natal woman, trannies are not my allies. They want the "right" to strip women of their life options just like the anti-abortion crowd does.
 
Kiwis, hear me!
zion.jpg
lol sorry just fucking with Tony

I'm pleased to tell you that Tony has a new dress, which looks like Monet threw up on him. Looks like he's overstuffed his right moob as well.

Tony's TikTok on the Roe v Wade decision (archive)

It's not as pronounced in this video (though it is in some of his from last week), but his eyeliner makes his face look like a shish kebab skewer with two pickled onions and a hunk of doner on it.
 
Kiwis, hear me!
View attachment 3421545
lol sorry just fucking with Tony

I'm pleased to tell you that Tony has a new dress, which looks like Monet threw up on him. Looks like he's overstuffed his right moob as well.

Tony's TikTok on the Roe v Wade decision (archive)
View attachment 3421557
It's not as pronounced in this video (though it is in some of his from last week), but his eyeliner makes his face look like a shish kebab skewer with two pickled onions and a hunk of doner on it.
I don't pretend to understand human biology enough to explain it, but he is seriously getting manlier, right? Or have I just looked at his Habsburg jaw too long to see any trace of femininity? Anyway, middle schoolers stuff their bras more convincingly, Tony. At least go get a water bra or some of those silicone chicken cutlets FFS.

Truth told I didn't even turn on the sound for this, so pardon my focus on things aside from the content, but it's a rough day to be a (real) woman and I'm not self-inflicting Tony on myself today except to call him names.
 
I don't pretend to understand human biology enough to explain it, but he is seriously getting manlier, right? Or have I just looked at his Hapsburg jaw too long to see any trace of femininity? Anyway, middle schoolers stuff their bras more convincingly, Tony. At least go get a water bra or some of those silicone chicken cutlets FFS.

I imagine the bafflingly bad attempts to ape femininity just make his male features stand out more. Bit like painting a nude man red, except for his cock.
 
No, these are things that were said to Tony - "Erin Reed" at the start is me having replaced his Discord username (InTheMorning#6375). I've edited the original post to make that clearer.

Condolences to US Kiwis who may now find themselves unable to get abortions.

That said, I do now wish to use this as a stick to beat Tony with. As we've discussed previously, Tony is obsessed with appeals to authority and having those in power validate his beliefs. I suspect that it is killing him that the highest court in the land has explicitly rejected his demands for "bodily autonomy" free from any kind of restriction:
View attachment 3421213

Tony may have been a PhD candidate but his reading comprehension is seriously 99th-percentile dunce shit. He cites Thomas's concurrance as meaning that contraception and same-sex marriage are next, as if Thomas is riding one of horses of the apocalypse.
View attachment 3421250
I can't and won't comment on the politics of the court, but the reason why Thomas says that is because:
  • Those specific cases were cited in the case at hand;
  • Thomas disagrees with the "due process" argument (and repeatedly cites himself saying that in the past).
That's all a bit abstract, but taking a step back: Thomas's argument about "due process" is that it has been used as an arbitrary shield to give the protection of the constitution to things that cannot possibly be construed as being protected by the constitution.

And another step back: previous rulings used this device inappropriately in their decisions, effectively legislating from the bench, and so those decisions should be reviewed.

So what? Well, this is exactly the reasoning of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in overturning the High Court decision in Bell v Tavistock. Tony loves to cite the appeal judgement in Bell to, essentially, say: "The transphobes had a win but then some better judges came along and agreed with the trans!"

What actually happened is that the Court of Appeal said that the High Court had effectively legislated from the bench, using the power of the court to intervene in ways that are entirely inappropriate.

Honestly it just boggles my mind that Tony has spent the last 18 years trying to make himself out to be a political expert but he cares so little for actual politics. As in, changing things through majority support codified in new legislation, rather than relying on technocratic procedure.

Sorry, enough sperging from me, so picture time. He's making this stupid fucking argument still:
View attachment 3421331

And the absolute brass neck of straight white man Tony "Erin" Reed, of the "Don't like pink? You must be a boy!" Party saying this:
View attachment 3421339
He acts like he doesn't understand the role of the court.
We know the supreme court exists to determine whether laws are constitutional or not. Do they violate the constition, yes or no.
He seems to think they are there to determine the law and that if they uphold or strike something in his favor that is "correct" and if not it's wrong. It's not *supposed* to be a political entity that makes decisions on what it deems best for citizens. For example, he protested to supreme court decision instead of supporting pro choice laws, as if public outcry is supposed to have an effect on the decision. Yes I know a lot of decisions are political, but they have to at least pretend to be impartial and caving to protests would completely undermine the legitimacy of the court so they were never going to do that .

Also lol at the idea that LGBT and specifically trannies are the ones standing in the way of "the patriarchy's " power. Last I checked you are a tiny percentage of the population that can barely be arsed to clean your room. Not to mention the fact that most big corps, media, and the entire fucking biden admin can't stop sucking tranny cock.

Cope, seethe, dilate.
 
Also lol at the idea that LGBT and specifically trannies are the ones standing in the way of "the patriarchy's " power. Last I checked you are a tiny percentage of the population that can barely be arsed to clean your room. Not to mention the fact that most big corps, media, and the entire fucking biden admin can't stop sucking tranny cock.
That and it literally being a bunch of men claiming they know women better than women themselves, while some women claim they have more “patriarchal privilege” than said men,
 
I imagine the bafflingly bad attempts to ape femininity just make his male features stand out more. Bit like painting a nude man red, except for his cock.
Also, our favorite hair strand isn't there this time - it can't possibly be doing that kind of heavy lifting drawing attention away from his man brow, can it?
Screenshot_20220624-114306.png
Screenshot_20220624-114306~2.png

Weirdly better. I stand corrected, Tony. That gross comb-over is an improvement to your imposing Neanderthal fivehead being on full display.
 
Seething about women again already :story: (archive)
tony-ovarit-1.png
tony-ovarit-2.png
Tony definitely that "friend" you have who wants nothing to do with you ever again after you disagree on anything.

Over 200 comments in that Ovarit thread (archive) and each is a gazillion times more correct than Tony will ever be.

ovarit-pp.png

They call out Cheese Stringio for this (archive):
cheese-stringio.png
And naturally reference the evergreen tweet:
birb.png

Pro tip for any Ovarit people lurking: include our Tony fan art and he'll stop screenshoting your threads.
 
Seething about women again already :story: (archive)
View attachment 3422023
View attachment 3422027
Tony definitely that "friend" you have who wants nothing to do with you ever again after you disagree on anything.

Over 200 comments in that Ovarit thread (archive) and each is a gazillion times more correct than Tony will ever be.

View attachment 3422047

They call out Cheese Stringio for this (archive):
View attachment 3422045
And naturally reference the evergreen tweet:
View attachment 3422046

Pro tip for any Ovarit people lurking: include our Tony fan art and he'll stop screenshoting your threads.
Ah the old terf aligned with the religious right canard that he likes to trot out constantly.

While I dont doubt that in some cases there might be mutually beneficial relationships between those two groups, from my observation they seem very much at odds. TERFs support abortion access, LGBs and are against traditional gender roles while right wingers feel differently. A cursory internet search didn't turn much up. Let me know if there is any truth to this claim. Sounds like a pathetic attempt to poison the well to prevent those with liberal priors from sympathizing with feminists when they complain about the excesses of troons. Its also being used here to blame terfs for roe being overturned because they sided against trannies ( um what?).

Scumbag move. He's basically saying, you don't want to let us trannies do whatever the hell we want ? This is what you get bitches!
 
Kiwis, hear me!
View attachment 3421545
lol sorry just fucking with Tony

I'm pleased to tell you that Tony has a new dress, which looks like Monet threw up on him. Looks like he's overstuffed his right moob as well.

Tony's TikTok on the Roe v Wade decision (archive)
View attachment 3421557
It's not as pronounced in this video (though it is in some of his from last week), but his eyeliner makes his face look like a shish kebab skewer with two pickled onions and a hunk of doner on it.
Centering the "trans experience" on a day natal women are basically told to go pound sand on safe legal abortions. Troon narcissisms knows no bounds. That it's delivered by this horrible chimera is just the cherry on top of the absurdity.
 
I don’t know why, but the fact he‘s basically admitted he’d trade his son’s existence to have been force-femmed at twelve makes it worse. Like, imagine being a woman defending your bodily autonomy. Maybe you had to have a termination because of medical problems, maybe you simply couldn’t raise a kid in your circumstances, maybe you were raped. And here’s this haunted life-sized marionette trying to hog the spotlight, rambling on about how cheap they find human life and health.
 
I don’t know why, but the fact he‘s basically admitted he’d trade his son’s existence to have been force-femmed at twelve makes it worse. Like, imagine being a woman defending your bodily autonomy. Maybe you had to have a termination because of medical problems, maybe you simply couldn’t raise a kid in your circumstances, maybe you were raped. And here’s this haunted life-sized marionette trying to hog the spotlight, rambling on about how cheap they find human life and health.
It's probably been noted before but he comes across like the square dude in HS that fell late and deep into psychedelics and other "enlightened experiences" and took absolutely nothing out of it other than that their ego and their experiences are world changing: if only everybody would just shut up and listen to them about how one time on some great acid the great Spirit in the Sky himself laid out the plan to humanities' higher purpose everything would be set right in the world.

In reality it just exposed a schizo brain with an unhealthy touch of egoism. I think he is at risk of an OD or total personality break once he fully comprehends how fucked up the rest of his life will be as a "woman".
 
A concurrence doesn't mean anything, Thomas just repeated things he's said forever. He's always hated Griswold and you can read his solo dissent on Lawrence itself to see his opinion on it since he was on the Court then. None of the other Justices even signed onto the concurrence, not even Alito. Tony thinks he's uncovered a cishet plot after seeing other people quote the lines from Thomas on Twitter as if we're all supposed to be equally ignorant about Thomas' long standing views as he is.

Thomas twenty years ago: "Hey guys, I hate Griswold."
Thomas for twenty years inbetween: "Griswold sucks."
Thomas now: "Hey guys, I still hate Griswold."
Tony: "AHA! HE ADMITS IT!"
 
I imagine the bafflingly bad attempts to ape femininity just make his male features stand out more. Bit like painting a nude man red, except for his cock.
Facial Feminization Surgery often doesn’t really “take.” His FFS is wearing off thanks to gravity and time. And soon enough they run out of bone to destroy and skin to yank taut, so an FFS revision would be very unwise.
 
Tony's TikTok on the Roe v Wade decision (archive)
View attachment 3421557
It's not as pronounced in this video (though it is in some of his from last week), but his eyeliner makes his face look like a shish kebab skewer with two pickled onions and a hunk of doner on it.

Hahahaha how is his face somehow getting bigger every day look at his chin hahahahahah he looks like Gaston

The friends are imaginary

They are the same "friends" who he was going to dance and make out with all night with at Pride (in reality he had an awkward, malodorous meetup with a few other TiMs and they all posed for selfies, avoided eye contact, and went home) and the same "friends" who he got his tattoo with at a Reddit meetup (because internet meetups always involve booking and obtaining an hours-long appointment with a tattoo artist who works on drunk people!)

Tony spends his life reinventing himself and trying on new identities in the hope that he will finally feel a deep connection to other humans and have meaningful experiences with them, but it never works, because the problem is within himself. He doesn't have the base-level empathy and interest in other humans that would allow him to experience meaningful friendships. Maybe he could develop it, with enough work and self-reflection and therapy, but he won't. Ultimately he sees other people as instruments and props, and then he wonders why he feels so alone.
 
Back