Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Harvey Danger said:
View attachment 3422531

"our spiritual ancestors believed in the agency of God's children"

Women in the clergy was a bigger mistake than women in politics. At least political women can engage in politics, clerical women can't seem to handle theology.
Click to expand...
If it weren't for a woman's meddling, we'd still be in Eden
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Claus, Associate Rick and 11 others
JimmyNugget said:
Judge Thomas: Directly says that they are going to go after people's other rights after taking away the right to abortion.

The Right: "Duhhh, why do people want to harm him he's just a judge"!

They have snipers and fucking swat surrounding the court, they know what they did was bad.
Click to expand...
The other justices literally said they aren't going to do shit about his other cases (which were also similar to Roe in that they made a bad decision). Also, liberals shouldn't be lecturing anyone on what right or wrong is seeing how they are basically godless hedonists that justify anything and everything wvil under the sun. You niggers are for killing the weakest in society, globohomo and bombing random brown people overseas. Fuck you.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Leslie Nielsen, spiritofamermaid, Claus and 18 others
Full Race Replay said:
I’m secretly hoping that this hyper saturated situation with eliminating roe v wade is one of the things which will end Clinton era hyperpartisanship, as while Biden fast tracks attempts to federally codify roe v wade style laws, a down the middle compromise can be found (this would not please the hardcore fundies or SJWs but nobody cares about those guys). But I am doubtful.
Click to expand...
he doesnt has the votes for it. Trump will do it with a 12 week limit on abortion.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Suikafag and Full Race Replay
Local FloRida-man said:
Remember in 1972 when blacks outbred whites and were 200% of the US population?
Click to expand...
Legbeards and Wignats simultaneously BTFO
ClarenceThomasLaugh-e1456506041744.png
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: FunPosting101, spiritofamermaid, Claus and 19 others
JimmyNugget said:
Judge Thomas: Directly says that they are going to go after people's other rights after taking away the right to abortion.

The Right: "Duhhh, why do people want to harm him he's just a judge"!

They have snipers and fucking swat surrounding the court, they know what they did was bad.
Click to expand...
When you need protection against people because they can't kill babies it's pretty clear who the bad guys are, but okay
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Pig Cups, Claus, make_it_so and 16 others
Tomboy Respecter said:
The other justices literally said they aren't going to do shit about his other cases (which were also similar to Roe in that they made a bad decision). Also, liberals shouldn't be lecturing anyone on what right or wrong is seeing how they are basically godless hedonists that justify anything and everything wvil under the sun. You niggers are for killing the weakest in society, globohomo and bombing random brown people overseas. Fuck you.
Click to expand...
Enjoy your rape babies. I'm sure they'll contribute a lot to society.
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: FunPosting101, Leslie Nielsen, justhereforments and 15 others
Tomboy Respecter said:
The other justices literally said they aren't going to do shit about his other cases (which were also similar to Roe in that they made a bad decision). Also, liberals shouldn't be lecturing anyone on what right or wrong is seeing how they are basically godless hedonists that justify anything and everything wvil under the sun. You niggers are for killing the weakest in society, globohomo and bombing random brown people overseas. Fuck you.
Click to expand...
Get shit on MAGAt, no one wants to live in your christian theocracy of awfulness. Now go blubber about the deep state.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: SHITTAHS CLOGGED!, Pig Cups, St.Davis and 101 others
JimmyNugget said:
Judge Thomas: Directly says that they are going to go after people's other rights after taking away the right to abortion.

The Right: "Duhhh, why do people want to harm him he's just a judge"!

They have snipers and fucking swat surrounding the court, they know what they did was bad.
Click to expand...
Clarence Thomas has a majority of votes on the Court all by himself?

Damn what a

BOSS NIGGER
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Pig Cups, St.Davis, John Furrman and 113 others
The Last Stand said:
I'm not racist but let me use a racial slur to MAKE A POINT!

WOW MAN
Click to expand...
"I'm not (insert -ist/-phobic here) but any (minority group) ever in a position to make a decision that affects me that doesn't make the right one is a (insert slur that would normally get the Twitter account suspended)!"

American liberals, many such cases.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: 820㎌Cap, Caesare, spiritofamermaid and 10 others
Absolutego said:
It may have been posted previously (this thread is moving at a lightning pace), but I have a thought experiment for angry pro-choice posters ITT:

Chuck Schumer (the current Senate Majority Leader) had the votes to codify Roe vs. Wade after this opinion leaked. Manchin, Murkowski, and Collins were all willing to vote aye on a bill that:
-Banned any restrictions on abortion during the first trimester
-Demanded "reasonable regulation" on any abortion access during the second trimester
-Required exceptions be made for the life and health of the mother during the third trimester.

Democrats could've saved Roe. It would have passed 52-48. Instead they voted on a bill that
-Legalized abortion access through all three trimesters
-Permitted sex-selective abortions
-And refused any religious exemption for doctors unwilling to perform the procedure.
And they lost 49-51.

They did so because they knew this would happen, because they want you upset at the Supreme Court and not them, because they had 50 years to fix this issue and preferred to dangle it like a shiny set of keys over your collective heads in a cynical means to get your vote.
And because you're more likely now to foolishly approve of them doing whatever naked power grabs against the Supreme Court that are likely forthcoming.
Click to expand...
Apologies if this has already been addressed, but they wouldn't have the votes....right? Don't you only need 50 votes for reconciliation? This would be normal legislation which would require 60 yes votes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Claus, Suikafag and 1 other person
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back