US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Democrats from the northeast have retired to NC, bringing their politics. I expect governor to issue an EO to expand abortion legality. My question is what is up with Alaska?
Eskimo incest rape. Fuck, when it's night time all the time for half the year, well...
 
View attachment 3422649
The locusts shall flee from their red nests.

I mean, look at how much has changed within these few hours!
View attachment 3422654
Never forget that this is the actual reason the left is so fucking assmad about this ruling and was so horrified at the prospect. A shitload of people have recently, not just from COVID but other shit as well, have been fleeing to more conservative states in a rapid acceleration. In my area even as small a timespan as five years ago it was incredibly rare to see anyone with died hair, or facial piercings - the last year and a half it's become nearly a common sight. These fucking clowns were expecting to just pick up and escape from the consequences of the shit they vote for to do it again in areas that don't yet have it, and are now getting hit with a gigantic neon sign that says "no, these places are not for you".

What would've been a blue turn in a decade or less has now been sharply arrested. Don't let any of these niggers tell you they give one wet, rancid shit about abortion being legal as they all know by now - even the dumbest ones - that it's just going back to the states. They're seething that the depleted-uranium escape hatch has slammed shut with the finality of a funeral dirge.
 
Learn to take screenshots, nigger. I can’t taste the salt through the potato you used to take a picture of your monitor.
Here it is. Refer to this post now. :) Enjoy the autism in better quality.
 

Attachments

  • bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-09-518.jpg
    bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-09-518.jpg
    294.8 KB · Views: 64
  • bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-15-656.jpg
    bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-15-656.jpg
    303.7 KB · Views: 63
  • bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-20-352.jpg
    bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-20-352.jpg
    327.9 KB · Views: 47
  • bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-25-076.jpg
    bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-25-076.jpg
    263.3 KB · Views: 39
  • bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-38-769.jpg
    bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-38-769.jpg
    279.2 KB · Views: 30
  • bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-57-318.jpg
    bandicam 2022-06-24 19-41-57-318.jpg
    130.7 KB · Views: 61
Well, while the whole Roe thing was going on, this happened.

Article: https://longisland.news12.com/house-set-to-vote-on-gun-violence-bill-approved-by-senate
Archive: https://archive.ph/7JL7i
--------------------------------------------------------
Congress sends landmark gun violence compromise to Biden

The House sent President Joe Biden the most wide-ranging gun violence bill Congress has passed in decades on Friday, a measured compromise that at once illustrates progress on the long-intractable issue and the deep-seated partisan divide that persists.

The Democratic-led chamber approved the election-year legislation on a mostly party-line 234-193 vote, capping a spurt of action prompted by voters' revulsion over last month’s mass shootings in New York and Texas. The night before, the Senate approved it by a bipartisan 65-33 margin, with 15 Republicans joining all Democrats in supporting a package that senators from both parties had crafted.

The bill would incrementally toughen requirements for young people to buy guns, deny firearms from more domestic abusers and help local authorities temporarily take weapons from people judged to be dangerous. Most of its $13 billion cost would go to bolster mental health programs and for schools, which have been targeted in Newtown, Connecticut, Parkland, Florida and many other infamous massacres.

And while it omits the far tougher restrictions Democrats have long championed, it stands as the most impactful gun violence measure that Congress has approved since it enacted a now-expired assault weapons ban nearly 30 years ago.

The legislation was a direct result of the slaying of 19 children and two teachers at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, exactly one month ago, and the killing of 10 Black shoppers days earlier in Buffalo, New York. Lawmakers returned from their districts after those shootings saying constituents were demanding congressional action, a vehemence many felt could not be ignored.

“No legislation can make their families or communities whole,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.. said of those victims. “But we can act to keep others from facing the same trauma.”

For the conservatives who dominate Republicans in the House, it all came down to the Constitution's Second Amendment right for people to have firearms, a protection that is key for many voters who own guns.

“Today they're coming after our Second Amendment liberties, and who knows what it will be tomorrow,” said Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the Judiciary panel's top Republican.

Impossible to ignore was the juxtaposition of the week's gun votes with a pair of jarring Supreme Court decisions on two of the nation's most incendiary culture war issues. The justices on Thursday struck down a New York law that has restricted peoples' ability to carry concealed weapons, and Friday it overturned Roe v. Wade, eliminating the protection for abortion that case had ensured for a half-century.

Fifteen Senate Republicans backed the compromise, but that still meant that fewer than one-third of GOP senators supported the measure. And with Republicans in the House solidly against it, the fate of future congressional action on guns seems dubious, even as the GOP is expected to win House and possibly Senate control in the November elections.

The bill lacked favorite Democratic proposals like bans on the assault-type weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines used in the slayings in Buffalo and Uvalde. But it still let both parties declare victory by demonstrating to voters that they know how to compromise and make government work.

Yet the Senate votes highlighted the wariness most Republicans feel about defying the party's pro-gun voters and firearms groups like the National Rifle Association. Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Todd Young of Indiana were the only two of the 15 up for reelection this fall. Of the rest, four are retiring and eight don't face voters until 2026.

Tellingly, GOP senators voting “no” included potential 2024 presidential contenders like Ted Cruz of Texas, Josh Hawley of Missouri and Tim Scott of South Carolina. Cruz said the legislation would “disarm law-abiding citizens rather than take serious measures to protect our children."

The talks that produced the bill were led by Sens. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Thom Tillis, R-N.C. Murphy represented Newtown, Connecticut, when an assailant killed 20 students and six staffers at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, while Cornyn has been involved in past gun talks following mass shootings in his state and is close to McConnell.

The bill would make the local juvenile records of people age 18 to 20 available during required federal background checks when they attempt to buy guns. Those examinations, currently limited to three days, would last up to a maximum of 10 days to give federal and local officials time to search records.

People convicted of domestic abuse who are current or former romantic partners of the victim would be prohibited from acquiring firearms, closing the so-called “boyfriend loophole."

That ban currently only applies to people married to, living with or who have had children with the victim.
There would be money to help states enforce red flag laws and for other states without them that for violence prevention programs. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have such laws.

The measure expands the use of background checks by rewriting the definition of the federally licensed gun dealers required to conduct them. Penalties for gun trafficking are strengthened, billions of dollars are provided for behavioral health clinics and school mental health programs and there's money for school safety initiatives, though not for personnel to use a “dangerous weapon."
--------------------------------------------------------
 
White leftist seethes at a minority because he doesn't share their political beliefs. Many such cases.
As probably mentioned before but if the streams of immigrants coming through the Southern Border were wearing MAGA hats, singing "God Bless America", and when interviewed said they were hoping for their families down the line vote Republican, the (likely now 200+ foot tall and with laser turrets) wall be completed within a year under the Democrats dime.

If these threads and articles about minorities voting against the dems bit by bit increasingly are true, it'll be horrifying and hilarious at the same time to see white leftists seethe with rage that the people they treat like pets are silently revolting against them.
 
You are thinking way to far out for their current plans. The hope was to intimidate the justices into not repealing Roe. Roe is very much a cornerstone of what lets them keep the black vote on the plantation. It in fact can be argued to be -the- cornerstone. Without it, anywhere that restricts them will see a steady conservatism increase in the black vote over the next several generations. This ruling single-handedly puts a massive stop to the steady blue-ing of red and purple states,
There's also the bit where voters from blue hellholes have a hard roadblock against their Californication of the rest of the nation now.
What does Roe have to do with the black vote? I’m not seeing the obvious connection.

It definitely should discourage liberals from moving to red states though.
As Gehenna stated, black women kill more babies through abortion than any other race.
Never forget that this is the actual reason the left is so fucking assmad about this ruling and was so horrified at the prospect. A shitload of people have recently, not just from COVID but other shit as well, have been fleeing to more conservative states in a rapid acceleration. In my area even as small a timespan as five years ago it was incredibly rare to see anyone with died hair, or facial piercings - the last year and a half it's become nearly a common sight. These fucking clowns were expecting to just pick up and escape from the consequences of the shit they vote for to do it again in areas that don't yet have it, and are now getting hit with a gigantic neon sign that says "no, these places are not for you".

What would've been a blue turn in a decade or less has now been sharply arrested. Don't let any of these niggers tell you they give one wet, rancid shit about abortion being legal as they all know by now - even the dumbest ones - that it's just going back to the states. They're seething that the depleted-uranium escape hatch has slammed shut with the finality of a funeral dirge.
Nothing makes the Left more livid than being told no. Nothing. They were so content to keep fleeing because people in flyover states can't exactly stop them from voting the same year they arrive in a new state and they know it. Having this up? They'd have to take some responsibility, and those bastards are hedonistic to an alarming degree.
 
You are thinking way to far out for their current plans. The hope was to intimidate the justices into not repealing Roe. Roe is very much a cornerstone of what lets them keep the black vote on the plantation. It in fact can be argued to be -the- cornerstone. Without it, anywhere that restricts them will see a steady conservatism increase in the black vote over the next several generations. This ruling single-handedly puts a massive stop to the steady blue-ing of red and purple states,
I personally think this may have a larger immediate impact on the Latino vote over the black vote, especially if the left makes a vulgar protest in the media.

The secondary impact on the black vote I think remains to be seen due to the longer generational timescale, though I might be underestimating the pro-life segment in the black vote though, perhaps those church ladies have a much greater influence than I think!
 
Last edited:
I personally think this may have a larger immediate impact on the Latino vote over the black vote, especially if the left makes a vulgar protest in the media.

The secondary impact on the black vote I think remains to be seen due to the longer generational timescale, though I might be underestimating the pro-life segment in the black vote though, perhaps those church ladies have a much greater influence than I think!
Women run the black community. They have a lot of influence.
 
huh... it's surreal how different past biden is

View attachment 3423566
If it turned out they killed the real biden and replaced him with a body double that went senile... It would make some sense. Might explain the constant lies. but then again OG Biden has a history of doing that.
 
huh... it's surreal how different past biden is

View attachment 3423566
90’s and 00’s Dems are a 180 degree flip from what they are now. Someone who’s views would make them comfortably a 90’s Democrat would be viewed as a Far Right Neo Nazi Chud White Supremacist by the current ilk of today.
 
Last edited:
Now that I've given it some thought, I fully expect huge amounts of money to be spent on getting abortion passed in red states. And if the legislatures try to head that off, they'll use the usual "we'll just pull our business out of your state" tactic they use with voting rights and tranny bathroom bills to get people riled up in those states.
Red states should do the $10 million leaving state tax for the lulz.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back