This is why you can't argue with shitlibs, they don't understand ANY nuance. All refugees are welcome, all guns should be banned, all abortions are good. There's zero thought to any of shit they spew, it's always going 100% in one direction and everything less than what they demand at the time is fascism.
Huh? No, the people killing babies, mostly unknowingly for Moloch, are the death cult. Roe V Wade was not the start, it's just one permutation of human sacrifice to obtain earthly desires.
I wish it was
If what you're saying is true they'll vote to change the law. What the fuck are you whining about?
while I've never voted Dem or Repub, Dems have won the popular vote of the last 5/6 presidential elections, with Republicans near threatening to destroy any pretense of democracy or their own sense of sanity to accept being a minority party most of the time
It's Schrödinger electorate, which simultaneously agrees with everything they say, but somehow also doesn't have the political will to pass any legislation to that effect.
>hate on the white males for ages because oppression
I'm pro-abortion because I know who gets the most abortions. I'm anti-abortion because it makes the most irritating demographic of women extremely upset.
The issue I've seen people discuss the most is "when does life actually begin?". That seems to be what drives either side of the argument, with one side believing it's when the child is actually ready to be born or whether it's directly at conception. Personally, I don't equate a fetus with an actual baby. The two are just too different to be counted as equals.
Someone would fail high school civics if it were actually taught in any meaningful manner. The role of the judiciary, especially SCOTUS, is not to cater to opinion polls. There are limits to that of course (if popular opinion gets too strong).
Insofar as we live in a democratic republic, engage the democratic process to get the abortion laws you want in your jurisdiction. Easy-peasy.
I read the entire decision yesterday and I think this is still unclear. The Federal government has dabbled in healthcare successfully before (cf. California v. Texas, 2021). Since there was never a federal abortion law, neither Roe nor Casey addresses whether the Federal government has the power to impose restrictions on the States in this matter, and therefore, neither does Dobbs.
Lol good
I assume if they're against abortion, they're in support for bearing arms. Which means they're likely packing. Have fun.
