Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure if old.
1656188285746.png
 
Lol no. Moving completely away from the West is best.

Westerners are like fish who are unaware of the existence of water. You have no idea how shitty your environment really is. “Best country in the world” is transparently ridiculous propaganda once you, you know, actually see how the rest of the world lives.
No one is saying the US is the best in the world lmao. Most people on KF would probably say otherwise imo.

Even if the US is shit, comparatively it isn't as shit like the Congo or even South Africa.
 
A newborn infant is fully developed? How about this little guy born 19 weeks early, can we at least still scramble his brains?
His twin didn't survive. Of course, Alabama. Not to undermine the rarity of such a medical miracle, but my point with being pro-choice is ... CHOICE. She made the choice to carry it to term, albeit premature. I won't be the one, nor should anybody, to FORCE her to get an abortion. That's not my point.
 
Like the infamous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, Roe was also egregiously wrong and on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided. Casey perpetuated its errors, calling both sides of the national controversy to resolve their debate, but in doing so, Casey necessarily declared a winning side.

Those on the losing side—those who sought to advance the State’s interest in fetal life—could no longer seek to persuade their elected representatives to adopt policies consistent with their views. The Court short-circuited the democratic process by closing it to the large number of Americans who disagreed with Roe.
I love how he used Plessy v Ferguson.
Adopting responsible sexual behaviors to own the chuds.
Daddy issues.
"Pay attention to meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"
 
I agree with you on most of that, but rape babies shouldn't be killed for the crimes of another person either though. And there's a good chance the mother would regret getting one, whereas once the baby is born there's nothing to regret if you just give it up for adoption.


This doesn't seem like a very good reason to abort either, especially since it can be abused rather easily.


A 17 year old can safely deliver a baby just like an 18 year old. It's probably more dangerous at younger ages, then it could probably be a legitimate medical concern.
I do agree that adoption is a better choice for babies conceived through rape. However with incest cases it can be different sometimes, the baby might be born with complications that could hurt them both physically and mentally.

In regards to the mental health thing, you're right, people could fake illness and have an abortion - but there needs to be absolute proof that this illness prevents them from even doing the most menial of tasks. I would also go as far as to say that drug addictions classify as temporary insanity. If you're a crackwhore you should be nowhere near children let alone having your own.

And for the age thing, you're also correct. Which may bring us to another arguement - should 18-19 year olds be considered adults? Most of the young adults nowadays are too irresponsible to have children anyhow, and these age groups are conceiving like it's going out of style. Unpopular opinion, but I've frankly always thought that 20 should be the age of adulthood. Can't vote or consent until you're 20.
 
His twin didn't survive. Of course, Alabama. Not to undermine the rarity of such a medical miracle, but my point with being pro-choice is ... CHOICE. She made the choice to carry it to term, albeit premature. I won't be the one, nor should anybody, to FORCE her to get an abortion. That's not my point.
That's a warped view, his twin not making it is a tragedy, not a point for pro-abortion. Fact is, little Curtis could have been blended and is in fact not fully developed, and wouldn't have been at birth even if he was full-term. You're not done growing from conception until 25 years post-birth.

Not being fully developed is not a proper justification to kill someone, nor is their dependence on others. This isn't a tough concept. You shouldn't have a "CHOICE" to kill an innocent life.

So yes, she should be "FORCED" to not kill her innocent child. We're forced to not do terrible things all the time, why the fuck should this be an exception?
 
Not being fully developed is not a proper justification to kill someone, nor is their dependence on others. This isn't a tough concept. You shouldn't have a "CHOICE" to kill an innocent life.
"Fully developed," as in being able to survive outside the woman's womb. At that stage, technically, it's a part of the woman's body.

You're not done growing from conception until 25 years post-birth.
Once you're born, you are a human life. That's why we have laws that protect children. At least they SHOULD be enforced, all this drag queen, transgender nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back