Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
How are people STILL falling for this?
FWHwvASUIAIy7f8.png

Same way they fall for every other blatant lie.
 
nobody gives a shit about drug addicts or fatties destroying their bodies with food. Liberals want to cry and pretend they give a shit but it's not society's problem that you can't keep your shit together.

we send drug addicts to prison.
Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if Liberal nu hippies want to glorify suicide and self harm. Just like with Tumblr did years back. What a pity.
 
Reporting rape and being confined / unable to take Plan B doesn't end a pregnancy.
Yes. Those kind of fall into that 2% range I was talking about wherein abortions would be ok.
I'd guess most are because the relationship is not serious enough beyond a sexual encounter.
You'd be correct. And yet the women don't take protection in the majority of cases.
If dudes wanted to be fathers and sacrifice everything the moment they knocked some one night stand up would women be terminating? I doubt it.
Yes. Yes they would, Usually because they didn't want it in the first place and don't want to spend their life with the guy that knocked them up, even when the father would sacrifice everything for them.
 
Okay, let's agree to disagree. Who would you rather have in charge of the pro-choice argument: me or @Android raptor?
If you insist, but I'd prefer to see you defend your ideas when challenged, especially because you seem somewhat reasonable.

And that's an easy choice between you two, you aren't a danger to babies (at least after they're removed from the womb). She literally seems insane and a danger to society, mental hospitals exist for people like her.
 
This is always the low IQ take and often same argument religious folk make. What you're insinuating is women should not have sex. Men are the ones doing the insemination and yet there is no shame for those creating the unwanted pregnancies. There are many instances where consent can be iffy such as when men lie about fertility or slip off a condom. Some men even claim to want a child until the birth occurs and they're expected to contribute something.

Abortion is eugenics with consent. It makes a lot more sense to offer a way out of parenthood during pregnancy than to have children born to those who should not be breeding (lack of responsibility). Workhouses and orphanages existed because of men who could not support the children they sired due to their death or abandonment (more often men were heads of households in earning so no daddy no bread). Attitudes towards women and fatherhood aren't improving so there will just be more babies without fathers around and more women who resent men.
Sounds like you need a chaperone to accompany you everywhere until your parents can arrange a suitable marriage. Preferably to a man who knows how to keep you in line without leaving marks and keeps you barefoot and pregnant.
 
Yes. Yes they would, Usually because they didn't want it in the first place and don't want to spend their life with the guy that knocked them up, even when the father would sacrifice everything for them.
Then that's fucking sad. Sexual freedom really done a number on male and female relations.
 
Last edited:
Then you agree the issue stems from the quality of males. Why do some men want to have so much sex that they can potentially create more children than they can rear?
genghis-khan-wc-9308634-1-402.jpg

The world is truly yours when the majority of the people living in it are your direct descendants
 
If you insist, but I'd prefer to see you defend your ideas when challenged, especially because you seem somewhat reasonable.

And that's an easy choice between you two, you aren't a danger to babies (at least after they're removed from the womb). She literally seems insane and a danger to society, mental hospitals exist for people like her.
I'll give you credit for being consistent with being pro-life. Particularly with Black babies too.
 
This is always the low IQ take and often same argument religious folk make. What you're insinuating is women should not have sex. Men are the ones doing the insemination and yet there is no shame for those creating the unwanted pregnancies. There are many instances where consent can be iffy such as when men lie about fertility or slip off a condom. Some men even claim to want a child until the birth occurs and they're expected to contribute something.

Abortion is eugenics with consent. It makes a lot more sense to offer a way out of parenthood during pregnancy than to have children born to those who should not be breeding (lack of responsibility). Workhouses and orphanages existed because of men who could not support the children they sired due to their death or abandonment (more often men were heads of households in earning so no daddy no bread). Attitudes towards women and fatherhood aren't improving so there will just be more babies without fathers around and more women who resent men.
I would 100% support actually serious laws that actually seriously bend over men who father children then don't properly support them

If a man cannot properly support a child or doesn't want to he should not be having sex without a condom or other contraception. If babby happens he should be forced to support it. Not the way it is now, seriously forced. Can you fuck off already with the hurr durr you just hate women having sex bullshit? If women didn't have sex I wouldn't be having sex either, fucking ludicrous that I think women shouldn't be having sex
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back