Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah so nearly 40 years ago. Things have changed and definitely the court looks at what the woman brings to the table as bunch as a man now. If you are a woman making 100k and he makes 50k and you have kids, big oof if you are the woman here as much as if you were the man.
Most states now won't grant alimony at all if the marriage lasts less than 10 years.
 
What I'm hearing here is that basically all marriages are just frauds, predicated and built entirely on notions of status and women are just gold diggers who monkey branch from one man to the next until they're with the peak man, unless it happens they earn more than every man there is in which case they'll have no male partner at all, and men are helpless fools for even entertaining the idea in the first place.
That's exactly how modern marriage works, yes. Which is why our ancestors made it illegal for women to have sex before marriage, have an affair once they were married, or petition for divorce.

Considering the callous disregard for men in general, it's really odd that women even bother predicating any sense of status on men at all whatsoever. A man is either a trophy or lower than dirt with no in-between.
How else can women achieve status? They aren't capable of competing with men on a level playing field. Even with Zoomers being ultra low t, they're still more athletic than women, better at finance, engineering, etc.
 
Last edited:
Latinos is also a chimeric concept that exists in dummyland USA, This is because it counts everything from white Castilleans (both in the iberian peninsual and places like Chile and Argentina) and dark mestizos in central and South America who are not at all the same people.
It's almost like, there was something already in place since the 1700's that not only made sense but also had some rather neato titles for people based on how many generations off they were from being that teeny tiny sliver of Spain that wasn't the whorespawn of moolies that ruled for half a century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casta hey if it aint broke dont' fix it they were onto something.
 
Wtf happened to society

FWITx0VXwAEsFxx.jpgFWITzzwXoAE8b1U.jpg
 
How else can women achieve status? They aren't capable of competing with men on a level playing field. Even with Zoomers being ultra low t, they're still more athletic than women, better at finance, engineering, etc.
If men are lower than dirt to women then their accomplishments would logically mean nothing to women, only other women would matter in this hierarchy.
 
Not all men are lower than dirt to women. Just 80% of them. But if you force women to have one sexual partner for life (enforced monagamy) it forces them to have realistic expectations.
Woman are like children in the sense they tend to use emotional based reasoning for a great deal of there problem solving skils. Having unreasonable expectations comes with the territory
 
Men's accomplishments bring financial reward.

Women value financial reward.
Okay, here's a question. Knowing this, why would anyone want to have a wife? You're either in the top 20% in which you're only valued for status, or you're in the lower 80% and you're the "settle" option. Either way, it's meaningless.
 
Okay, here's a question. Knowing this, why would anyone want to have a wife? You're either in the top 20% in which you're only valued for status, or you're in the lower 80% and you're the "settle" option. Either way, it's meaningless.
I'm not arguing  for it but it's because people want to be loved and have families and shit.

We should definitely holocaust divorce lawyers though.

Edit: in Minecraft
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back