- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
Tom adds his two cents of gravel to the abortion debate....
Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
Seeing Tom’s face will cause your unborn child to kill itself with the umbilical cord.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Such "herbs" will also kill the woman as well. I wish this dumb fuck would just die already.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
No, see these herbs are not poison because they're able to detect the different aura from the fetus and understand not to harm the mother. The accuracy and intensity are magnified when combined with the living energy this
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
Tom explains Opsec for the abortion underground railroad
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
So the retard is offering to commit more crimes on Facebook and to potentially kill women.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
Fucking satellites can hear you? Gmail? Cell phones are secure? He's not even talking about encrypted chats. This is the most boomer tier shit I've read in a while. On Tom's underground railroad, you pay for the ride to end.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Considering that GMail is well known to read every email to and from your account he really doesn't know what he's talking about. Even Protonmail isn't as secure as people think it is (they will log you if asked by authorities).
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2022
No even that OpenAI, GPT3 or whatever that shit's called will ever decypher what Thomas speaks through a video call.
At most the AIs will give up and resort to say that he's a faggot, a chomo or a dogfucker and hand his ass to the feds.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
“We don’t talk about illegal acts in public,” he said on Facebook.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2019
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2020
I've read that if they get the right angle on you a satellite can basically lip read you. It was on TV so it could very well be propaganda.
Also the advice to meet at trailheads is ridiculous. If the satellites are watching you'll be a much easier target. A crowded place preferably under a roof would be much safer.
- Joined
- May 9, 2016
Keep pounding those keyboards to prove that you are a pack of absurdly delusional self loathing overgrown juvenile delinquents with severe delusions of adequacy, relevance and legal standing, most particularly @Anonymus Fluhre , @Tragi-Chan and @DSP's Tax Lawyer. Your proof that I am a pedophile is ridiculous and is not accepted as valid anywhere but here. stay stupid, fan boys.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
Sorry, Tom, we’re not going to take the words of a drug-addled pedo of below-average intelligence over the legal definition. Seethe, cope and shart, fat boy.
- Joined
- May 9, 2016
not really. when people are walking on a beach or in the woods, it is difficult to get close enough to eavesdrop. A lot of illegal business does get transacted in crowded, noisy rooms though.
Often the retard is the one obeying the law, like you're doing now.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
Do you consider the age of consent to be an “unjust law?” Just as Tommy Jay-Efferson raped his slaves, so you think raping kids is justified?
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2014
It’s accepted as valid in many countries. Even if it was only accepted here I still find it strange you would sexually engage with a 15 year old when you’re more than twice her age. Say she’s mature all you want but the fact is 15 year olds aren’t the best at determining what they want. I firmly believe the age of consent should be 18 at the lowest for this reason. This doesn’t make you as bad as say Nick Bate who did go after his prepubescent Half-Sister but it sure as fuck still makes you bad.
The dog thing is also weird. You’re a weird person for doing that. If you didn’t and you were just talking shit you’re an attention whore which is also pretty fucking bad.
I may banter with you a bit because it amuses me but I really do believe you’re the one who’s disturbed and by your own admission go to places where people hate you and have a very narrow circle of people otherwise. That isn’t normal. This is really a big reason why people keep bringing it up. You contribute nothing to the conversation more than just further embarrassing yourself.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Hate to break it to you Thomas but I'm in my forties, please stop fantasizing about me being a child it's really creepy.
If you don't think the evidence you provided is valid than please head to the nearest police station and hand it in and see what they have to say in person.
Awe! I'm sorry that I'm a law abiding citizen and not a drugged up pedophile dog fucker like you are Thomas. I follow the Five Precepts, you should try it sometime.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
Our imaging satellites don't have anywhere near that resolution. There was the hysteria in 2019 to bash Trump over "leaking" milsat imagery of a failed Iranian missile launch. Whether he released it because he's an idiot or whether it was calculated by the Pentagon, it made waves because it had something like 10cm resolution. Some analysts couldn't believe it wasn't from an airborne asset. That's with a 2.4m mirror. It wouldn't surprise me if that isn't the best we have, but even doubling it's resolution wouldn't put an image satellite in the realm of lip reading. That doesn't even begin to address the speed satellites orbit at and time on target for video, which I'm not sure video sats even exist because of how limited they would be.
The really cool shit being done with satellites today, that we know about, is synthetic aperture radar.
this is actually the video I was thinking of
You should be watching S2 and not taking advice from Tom's facebook if you want to evade modern government surveillance.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
One of the better commercial satellites uses machine learning to clear up the image and it's still a blurry mess. At best we have 15cm HD which means 1 pixel is 15cm. The US government supposedly has 7cm HD imaging. Still not enough to see someones lips.
Last edited: