Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Last Stand said:
What's a poutine and what does food have to do with this?
Click to expand...
xXxFat_CuntXxX said:
Apparently Canadians have a god given right to Vladimir Putin and fat people mainly talk about it so I assume he produces special milk in a bag to sustain the Canuck's
Click to expand...
You two can't be this stupid, can you? The Poutine is abortion you dense motherfuckers.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Butcher Pete, whothefuck, Bananadana and 2 others
Swingletonthesimpleton said:

this is just sad. Do people not realize that most jobs that matter count them as expendable and most likely have a list of immigrants ready to replace them the moment they stop making them money.
Click to expand...
Since I have a no strike clause in my contract, I will follow their advice and response to Priority 1 calls in liberal areas much slower than normal.

Road conditions, you know...
 
  • Like
Reactions: not william stenchever, BBChannel, spiritofamermaid and 1 other person
allen_nberry84 said:
Is there a way to redact the woman, while keeping the baby alive?
Click to expand...
Looks far enough along that it could survive without the mother. Cut it out without anesthetic like they did Julius Caesar, crown the kid emperor of Rome.
AnnLurker said:
You two can't be this stupid, can you? The Poutine is abortion you dense motherfuckers.
Click to expand...
'twas but a joke, you stupid nigger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, StevieLasVegas, Knight of the Rope and 1 other person
No0neKnows said:
I hope /kiwi/ is getting their vasectomy certificate ready so they are able to consume this object.

View attachment 3427373
Click to expand...
These people truly are insane. This is litterly what conserviteves want them to do. And i dont think the pro life people are the type to want to fuck you anyways, not their type. They are litterly just hurting their own side lol. But they're probabley a whore anyways so i doubt they would actually stop. Or they're a land whale.
 
Look on the bright side, people! At least red states will have less homeless people because younger and more educated people will leave, and thus there will be less demand for housing, and the prices will lower...maybe.

But in blue states people better hurry up and buy homes while the prices haven't risen because of substatiantial migration towards them.
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Anya15, Space_Dandy, spiritofamermaid and 1 other person
Overly Serious said:
So do the people making pro-abortion arguments of "it's just a clump of cells" also advocate that a man should have the right to demand an abortion from someone he has gotten pregnant? I mean, the effects of an unwanted child on him are life-changing: 18+ years of child support payments under threat of imprisonment; social consequences, inheritance effects possibly taking from his other children... It's unarguably massive. And if a woman can choose to avoid major consequences in her life because it's a "safe and normal medical procedure" that only affects a "clump of cells" then should that not be extended to him also?

I assume all these feminist campaigners determined that abortion is a right because of the impact of being forced to keep it on the mother; similarly believe that a man should have the right to demand an abortion takes place because of the impact on him? Right?
Click to expand...
No, they don't. It's called pro choice for a reason. I will agree that contraception is priority number one, as will the doctors most likely. Abortion should be a last resort option. And it's the vooman's body, so it's up to the vooman to decide whether or not she wants to abort.

And no, China Virus vaccines aren't remotely the same. It's apples an oranges. Unvaccinated people can spread more viruses than vaccinated ones. If a vooman aborts it doesn't make other voomans nearby magically abort.

Then there's also the issue of hospitalization rates. Hospitals were being overcrowded with china virus patients even with all the restrictions. At some point they would've eventually just be so crowded that death rates would go up because of the reduced quality of care.

Vaccines significantly reduced hospitalization rates and the severity in general. Now, that also means that rushing with vaccines that didn't even reach phase 3, like China and Russia did, isn't a good idea. But now we do have proper vaccines.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Disagree
Reactions: justhereforments, ApeBass, incelita and 60 others
Cavalier Cipolla said:
No, they don't. It's called pro choice for a reason. I will agree that contraception is priority number one, as will the doctors most likely. Abortion should be a last resort option. And it's the vooman's body, so it's up to the vooman to decide whether or not she wants to abort.
Click to expand...
It's the woman's choice because it affects her body? But it affects the man's life massively too. If it's just a clump of cells why doesn't he get the chance to demand an abortion because it affects him? You're surely not suggesting the impact on the man isn't life changing. Imagine being signed up for a twenty year mortgage on a house you can't even live in, because you crashed there one night.

If the fetus isn't a human being, has no right to life, then why should the man's choice matter less than the woman's when it affects him just as much?

Now, if you believe the fetus has a right to life as pro-life people do, then the guy doesn't get a say. Just the same as the woman doesn't get a say - because it's the fetus that matters. But if you believe it is "just a clump of cells" then the guy has as much say as the woman. And surely feminists who argue a position based on that should be consistent and say the man can demand an abortion for the same reasons as the woman. Because of the consequences on him if the procedure isn't carried out.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dislike
Reactions: not william stenchever, Ortsnay, Netizennameless and 6 others
Overly Serious said:
So do the people making pro-abortion arguments of "it's just a clump of cells" also advocate that a man should have the right to demand an abortion from someone he has gotten pregnant? I mean, the effects of an unwanted child on him are life-changing: 18+ years of child support payments under threat of imprisonment; social consequences, inheritance effects possibly taking from his other children... It's unarguably massive. And if a woman can choose to avoid major consequences in her life because it's a "safe and normal medical procedure" that only affects a "clump of cells" then should that not be extended to him also?

I assume all these feminist campaigners determined that abortion is a right because of the impact of being forced to keep it on the mother; similarly believe that a man should have the right to demand an abortion takes place because of the impact on him? Right?
Click to expand...

Nobody gives a damn about men and they never have. Women somehow kick tranny commies out of their sports and magically become the only gender that can give birth again during pride month of all months - the most holy month of the year. What do men get? We get blamed for the bioleninists that are attacking women who they label as "terfs". If we could get some real equality and finally get men the same rights that women enjoy then they wouldn't have to worry about having their lives fucked over with child support payments, both abortions and child support payments make it far too easy for women to be sluts.

Cavalier Cipolla said:
No, they don't. It's called pro choice for a reason. I will agree that contraception is priority number one, as will the doctors most likely. Abortion should be a last resort option. And it's the vooman's body, so it's up to the vooman to decide whether or not she wants to abort.

And no, China Virus vaccines aren't remotely the same. It's apples an oranges. Unvaccinated people can spread more viruses than vaccinated ones. If a vooman aborts it doesn't make other voomans nearby magically abort.

Then there's also the issue of hospitalization rates. Hospitals were being overcrowded with china virus patients even with all the restrictions. At some point they would've eventually just be so crowded that death rates would go up because of the reduced quality of care.

Vaccines significantly reduced hospitalization rates and the severity in general. Now, that also means that rushing with vaccines that didn't even reach phase 3, like China and Russia did, isn't a good idea. But now we do have proper vaccines.
Click to expand...

You would have to have severe retardation to believe that at this point, retardation likely caused by the spikes produced by the mrna sequences in your body. If you can still catch, spread, and get sick from a virus that you are vaccinated against then it's not a vaccine. Half of the farms knew this in 2020, I hope by 2030 you might wake up. My body my choice to get vaccinated.

Why do bioleninists even want abortions in the first place? In a less disgusting time you might assume a pro abortionist would be thinking of rape, the health of the mother, and disabled babies, but none of those are brought up in current times. So it comes down to white genocide, the joy of killing babies, or a cult-like devotion to unprotected sex. All of those are quite fucked up, but I wouldn't expect anything less from a group that firebombs pregnancy centers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basketball American
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back