Is Nick Fuentes a Pedophile? - Sussy behavior far worse than we imagined

[Getwhatyou]

Nah I don't think so. I think he would be very specific about what he allowed to violate his rectum

 

[supremeautismo]

BREAKING: new evidence of pedophilia in regards to known AF associate Trey Godz
View attachment 3365994
View attachment 3365992

Another passive acceptance of pedophilia (no, not pederast, full-out pedophilia) in AF. Admission to watching child porn— great optics.

 

[Rosy Reptile]

The whole ironybro/AF circle has always been inseparably intertwined with an openly (though often post-ironically) pederastic subculture of anime homosexuals. If you honestly believe that Jaden's reference to Nick's "sick" tastes ends at simple pedophilia and tranny porn then I honestly envy your naiveté. In the context of the backdoors AF sphere that stuff is borderline vanilla. I'd be surprised if any of them would even raise an eyebrow for anything less than nonconsent (other than statutory rape, obviously).

Think about what "catboys" etc actually are from the artwork, physiologically. They're drawn with the proportions of someone in early high school at the very oldest. Sometimes, the "it's just a drawing" defense kind of half-works. It's pedo-adjacent but maybe not full pedo, in the same way that some guys who masturbate to gay furry porn aren't into men IRL. There's an extra leap to be made that some never go for. That doesn't apply here, though, when you've got guys in these circles under 16 that openly call themselves "catamites" and other similar things. I'm just gonna post a random example I had lying around of the sort of thing I'm talking about, and I'm sure any of you can find more just by looking at any argument on twitter pertaining to Nick:



When you've had 14 year olds with trans flags catgaurding this guy since last decade, we should really be past this point in the conversation.

 

[Meiwaku]

The Jacob Sartorius stuff is indeed incredibly sussy. Not enough to call him a pedophile unless he is caught with CP or grooming minors, which will probably happen in the future.

Gay men make up only 1-2% of the population, but 33% of child molesters. Something to consider.

Males make up half of the population and almost 100% of violent, sexual, and general crime. Something to consider.

For a lot of people, their pedo likes don't reflect sexuality other than they just like the power play. Entirely married hetero appearing men come out as pedos, of which boys are amongst their victims. So I wouldn't inherently peg them all as gay. But some definitely are and I agree disproportionately so but I cannot quote the official statistics as I haven't seen the literature for this year. If you're interested, the glowies release an annual crime report stats on their website which includes sex crimes. Theres also the National Crime Victimization Survey which is for anon victim reports and RAINN (Rape and Incest National Network) that also does statistical reports of data. These are likely the best sources to get your data from if you're going to accuse (group) of (crime stat).

The average pedo has about 20- 30 victims in their lifetime.

Nick is sus. If they found pedo stuff on his hard drive, I wouldn't be surprised. But investigating him might not be worth it if I was a Fed because sussy comments isn't as bad as distribution of this.

Nick also has Dowiee who is flirting with him who is a 17 year old MTF tranny. Dowiee was in a group chat with him and other trannies he left but recently got asked to be let back in. Dowiee also entertains comments from chasers and obvious pedos on their other accounts like the ask questions sites and wants sexual attention from men. Dowiee has been in Nick's Twitter spaces and recently nuked his Twitter but is a Troon so naturally will be back.

Dowiee turns 18 this August.

 

[slickerthanyouraverage]

Nick called 15 y/o Dixie D'Amelio 'hot'.

 

[Puck]

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, makes multiple tweets bashing the age of consent like a pedophile duck.

You can probably say that that duck wants to fuck kids

 

[Sam Losco]

View attachment 3428724

Nick called 15 y/o Dixie D'Amelio 'hot'.

15? I have no idea who she is, but Wikipedia says she was born in 2001, that makes her 20/21 not 15.

 

[supremeautismo]

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, makes multiple tweets bashing the age of consent like a pedophile duck.

You can probably say that that duck wants to fuck kids

15? I have no idea who she is, but Wikipedia says she was born in 2001, that makes her 20/21 not 15.

How old is this clip? I have a feeling she’s of age when this clip was made (based on his pedo stache), but Nick never surprises me with his degeneracy.

 

[A Dapper Gent]

How old is this clip? I have a feeling she’s of age when this clip was made (based on his pedo stache), but Nick never surprises me with his degeneracy.

Imo it doesn't matter since he said what he said thinking she was 15.

 

[Catboy Slayer]

Nick's views on the age of consent have been heavily influenced by Andrew Anglin/The Daily Stormer

Take this article for example:

https://web.archive.org/web/2021090...ar-old-boy-regardless-of-what-the-law-allows/
"Pornhub Ambassador Says She’d Have Sex with 13-Year-Old Boy Regardless of What the Law Allows"
"Asa Akira should pay the price of what? Of having an opinion? If we’re not telling teens to get married, what we’re telling them, by omission, is that they should fornicate, indulge in pornography and masturbate"

This is very similar to the statements Nick made about the Matt Gaetz incident

Actually, Anglin's position on the Matt Gaetz thing was basically the same as Nick's:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220627042252/https://stormer-daily.rw/gaetzgate-gaetz-is-okay-i-guess/
"Frankly, I like Matt Gaetz a lot better now that I know he’s a heterosexual, and that the feds are after him. I definitely stand with him against the feds, and I don’t care if he has sex with 17 year olds posing as 18 year olds."

Here's Anglin making the classic libertarian hebephilia argument:

https://web.archive.org/web/2017072...hest-ranking-official-charged-with-pederasty/
"DON’T LET THEM SAY “PEDOPHILE” – IT’S NOT “PEDOPHILIA” This is going to be a massive story, of course, which will drag on for years. Because the Jews love this. They love attacking Christianity. And they hate the Catholic Church to this day, regardless of the fact that we have a full-on SJW Pope on our hands right now. They are going to refer to this as a “pedophile scandal.” That is not what it is. This is the definition of pedophilia, via Wikipedia: Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia. PREPUBESCENT. NOT “BELOW THE AGE OF CONSENT.” An alter-boy is 11-14ish. NOT PREPUBESCENT."

It gets worse:

https://web.archive.org/web/2022062...p-content/weeklies/Stormer-vol-3-phone-a6.pdf (page 9)
"And I cannot say enough that it is women who are pushing this. I have been criticized for saying that white women want to fuck these animals. But that has always been hyperbolic. Of course, a good percentage of them do want to fuck these animals – in the above story, all of these girls went willingly with these men to hotels and such and then cried “rape.” You can white knight and say “oh well a 12-year-old girl can’t give consent” – and okay, that is some kind of philosophical question, but she went to the man’s flat. And a 12-year-old girl knows what sex is."

Also I can't find it, but sometime in mid or late 2021 Anglin wrote an article about feminism that made arguments like "the age of consent was a feminist construct" and "in the middle ages adults married 13 year olds".

Nick has also made similar statements about the age of consent being a feminist construct

As I explained here Anglin's articles have clearly significantly shaped Nick's views, and the similarities in the statements the two have made about the age of consent are striking. It's unclear if Nick himself is attracted to minors, but he definitely holds beliefs that are used to justify pedophilia

 

[slickerthanyouraverage]

15? I have no idea who she is, but Wikipedia says she was born in 2001, that makes her 20/21 not 15.

Guess I have her confused with sister Charli (who was born in 2004), and Nick has as well. The clip is also old.

 

[TayandYou]

I don't know if he is a pedo, but I know that Nick is very gay.

 

[No Batty Boys in Jamaica]

Unironically, it's microplastics. Microplastics in the bloodstream lead to heightened levels of estrogen via endocrine disruptors. Adolescent males are scientifically less masculine than they were a few decades ago and it's because every food company insists on covering their products in plastic packaging for some reason.

One contributing factor is that HIV infection rates have gone down and nobody dies of AIDS in the US anymore. In the 80s and early 90s a whole generation of chi chi men and troons were wiped out. If Nick Fuentes and Andy Ngo were around in the 80s, they probably would’ve gotten pozzed by Roy Cohn and croaked while Reagan ate Jelly beans.

Microplastics are a massive problem but AIDS really did slam the brakes on the sexual revolution and bought the Christian Right around 20 years of “I told you so”. Then a new crop of fags, now laden with BPA, came up and spread via the internet.

 

[GordonRameses]

Guess I have her confused with sister Charli (who was born in 2004), and Nick has as well. The clip is also old.

I believe the clip is from 2020, meaning Charli would have been 15 going on 16 at the time.

 

[tantric_depressive]

Definitely a groomer

I believe the clip is from 2020, meaning Charli would have been 15 going on 16 at the time.

Nick wants to lead a gay NXIVM glowcult, where they listen to Disney popstars while playing volleyball - the gayest shit since Liberace was around

what happened to MM? Watch their final episode. They basically decided to stop making episodes because they thought politics was futile. I think they did something like over 100 murdoch murdoch episodes. It was prolific. The final episode was essentially a call to action exhorting whites to stand up and prevent further destruction/degeneration of society. Final episode was kino, they even brought in Terence McKenna which was pretty funny. Basically they said all they had to say at that time, the episode came out right at the end of Trump's presidency or when Biden got inaugurated.

I think they realized that making funny cartoons wasn't enough to wake people up, it was just entertainment for those already redpilled so to speak. But...what else can you do really? I do hope they come back, there's certainly a lot of material over the past year that they could work with. I also get the sense that the creators want to do something truly artistic, they don't just want to make funny memes and videos

I'm pretty sure he wrote a book too, I think you can listen to it's audio version free on the MurdochMurdoch archive site

 

[Meiwaku]

Nick has and is frequently interacting and making sexual commentary with underage boys & girls because sexually immature women have a boyish figure lmao. He also does not disengage with people who hit on him who are underage and has allowed underage individuals to continue in AF and for members to have hooked up with underage members like SimonSasquatch who groomed his wife.

Nick IS a groomer and pedorast confirmed. I also don't believe the shit tier argument "he hasn't committed because of optics". Dude, if he was going to worry about Optics he wouldnt have done almost 90% of the things he's done now. AF doesn't care about statutory rape either (see:Ralph) they don't give a shit about any sex crime to any gender or else they would cut out a good chunk of AF. Crime is based, remember?

All I can think of seeing y'all defend his age preference is the classic "my uncle isn't a pedo he's a hebephile/ ephibiophile" meme video here:

 

[Buster Scruggs]

I wouldn't say he's a pedo for sure until more comes out, although if he was I wouldn't be surprised. I mean didn't he like Milo who was a pedophile too IIRC? I could totally see him just parroting shit like a retard, but I can also see him being a dumb degenerate zoomer who thinks age doesn't matter. I'd say 50/50, but the Jacob tweets are just flat out creepy and you know he'd use that whole "it was irony bro!!! you got trolled!" excuse if he ever fully addresses this. He does openly associate with pedophiles though, so either way he's just as bad as someone like Dick when he was kissing Digibro and Meigh's asses for being into loli. Either way he's on a slippery slope and associating with known pedophiles always ends badly.

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

Nick has and is frequently interacting and making sexual commentary with underage boys & girls because sexually immature women have a boyish figure lmao. He also does not disengage with people who hit on him who are underage and has allowed underage individuals to continue in AF and for members to have hooked up with underage members like SimonSasquatch who groomed his wife.

Nick IS a groomer and pedorast confirmed. I also don't believe the shit tier argument "he hasn't committed because of optics". Dude, if he was going to worry about Optics he wouldn't have done almost 90% of the things he's done now. AF doesn't care about statutory rape either (see:Ralph) they don't give a shit about any sex crime to any gender or else they would cut out a good chunk of AF. Crime is based, remember?

All I can think of seeing y'all defend his age preference is the classic "my uncle isn't a pedo he's a hebephile/ ephibiophile" meme video here:

He could just date a flat chested legal age woman instead, but doesn't want the "emotional baggage" lol.

I'm 90% Nick is the said he likes underage women because he thinks they are easier to manipulate.

In re to the "loli" stuff:

Either he doesn't know of the existance of 1466A for Section 2256( 8 )(B) of title 18, USC, or has no idea how to properly conduct a Miller test on what obscenity is. Because I'm pretty sure if you put it to a jury, the ONLY prong that might fail would be the third prong of "Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value".
...Not that twitter or any other online image site with porn really has that enforced against them, but that is another matter entirely.....

The three prongs are:

1. Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
2. Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law,
3. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

 

[Nod Flenders]

Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But he's definitely a massive faggot.

 

[Sulla]

Well given that he's admitted to shielding and protecting pedophiles, he might actually be.