Supreme Court Watch

[6MillionCoofs]

I’m seeing a lot of “take note of people not talking about this enough!” Rrreeeeeeeeeee!

I'm getting a lot of 'but what about the rape, or complications etc' You know that 2%.

 

[Autism Extraordinaire]

Meh, you're just noticing the ones who are the loudest.
Plenty of women don't give a shit, are not surprised by this, or figure "use birth control".

I know enough to know that there are women with an ounce of sense in this world, and that it isn't just women who are like this. There are also plenty of histrionic cucks who absolutely fail at being proper men.

It's just that there are so many of these whiny little cunts, especially in blue states (fucking kill me) , that you might as well start litmus testing people on the first date to see if you can actually trust them enough to go any further with them.

 

[Philier]

You know, I am seeing a lot of women here (even on this forum, jesus christ) that would rather kill a baby than use protection or, better yet, not have sex. In other words, no fucking sign of any accountability, with it being their own children who take the fall for their piss poor decision-making.

Lord help me, I think I'm actually becoming sexist.

I hate this cliche but #NotAllWoman
It is a loud minority, but woman are inherently loud to begin with so it amplifies the screechness.

I don't agree on the zero limit part, unless the mother's life is in danger. Actually, fuck it, I'd really like to hear what scientists think about it. I'll rather listen to scientists who know better about the topic than politicians on the left AND right.

Scientist don't say shit about it because it's not a scientific question. ( To be specific, scientists, as people, can say whatever the fuck they want, because it's irrelevant. The scientific method has nothing to say about it, because there's nothing to "prove" ). Abortion is one of those cases were only the extreme opinions are the consistent ones, which is how science usually works anyway. A lot of people have very "hollywood" ideas of what science is. Those people obviously didn't study a scientific career.

So, ironically, the most "scientific" responses are either:

a - All abortions are child murder.
b - You can liquify 9 month baby before it's born and it's perfectly fine.

All other responses are compromises between these two and extremely inconsistent and arbitrary which is anathema to science.
That being said, this has nothing to do with science anyway.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1540590179148148737

For some reason the look on the face of the woman in the bottom left at the beginning disgusts me. Not because I'm pro-choice/pro-life, but because the war is not yet won and they are already celebrating.
They will forget about this in a few months is my guess.

View attachment 3429167
But then on the opposite end, we have this:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1540509215587966976

View attachment 3429172
I want off this clown world.

The blonde cutie? When you are that hot you can make whatever face you want and it's going to be hard for me to hate you.

 

[H3llonwheels]

you might as well start litmus testing people on the first date to see if you can actually trust them enough to go any further with them.

That is the point of dating isn’t it? If everyone did that, we wouldn’t have this thread or the mass spergout

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

You sure this isn’t just a disagreement?

Yes because if I don't donate a kidney, I'm not directly nor intentionally killing someone.
If I shove forceps through someone's head, I am directly killing them with intent.

The two situations are not equivalent.

You mean like legalizing elective abortions?

That is the lie by omission from the abortion lovers is that they want elective abortions while the states banning it, are on the therapeutic side of abortion if the mother's life is in danger.

Right. Abortions from rape & medical emergency collectively make up less than 1% of abortions, yet they act like its >50%.
However, my main major point was that the SCOTUS ruling didn't outlaw abortion, it just made it fair game like 99.9% every other action or item that can be regulated; hence the comparison to marijuana because there is no constitutional right to smoke pot yet the US is slowly walking towards full recreational legalization.
My other point is the Dem politicians just didn't want to actually do politics and work to pass those laws, because that might mean they have to negotiate with the evil republiKKKalibans to do so.

 

[Tactical Wizard]

I don't know if that article fit this thread but it's funny to read some tweets coming from progressists meltdowns about Obama and RBG.

https://conservativebrief.com/prog-64144/

RBG from hero to zero.

The funny thing is that Ruth tried to warn them that Roe v. Wade was going to blow up in their face and they didn’t listen.

 

[MuuMuu Bunnylips]

Are you new here? Or have you just never been to the Ethan Ralph sub-forum?

Well, he is Especially dumb, so...

 

[Philier]

I know enough to know that there are women with an ounce of sense in this world, and that it isn't just women who are like this. There are also plenty of histrionic cucks who absolutely fail at being proper men.

It's just that there are so many of these whiny little cunts, especially in blue states (fucking kill me) , that you might as well start litmus testing people on the first date to see if you can actually trust them enough to go any further with them.

The whole point of dating is knowing more about someone. Sure, it can be a fun thing to do by itself but if that's the case you are better of going out and having fun with your friends.

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

Scientist don't say shit about it because it's not a scientific question. ( To be specific, scientists, as people, can say whatever the fuck they want, because it's irrelevant. The scientific method has nothing to say about it, because there's nothing to "prove" ). Abortion is one of those cases were only the extreme opinions are the consistent ones, which is how science usually works anyway. A lot of people have very "hollywood" ideas of what science is. Those people obviously didn't study a scientific career.

So, ironically, the most "scientific" responses are either:

a - All abortions are child murder.
b - You can liquify 9 month baby before it's born and it's perfectly fine.

All other responses are compromises between these two and extremely inconsistent and arbitrary which is anathema to science.
That being said, this has nothing to do with science anyway.

Because its widely agreed that the fetus is human (i.e. Homos sapiens), it just boils away to the "social" question of whether or not its a "person" (which again one can see how justifying the killing of human beings because "they aren't people lol" is a one-way ticket to bad territory)

Which is why you get weird cope arguments comparing a fetus to hair cells or cancer cells, and the more recent argument of "okay well sure its a living person, but I didn't invite them to live in my body for 9 months!" (except they did)

 

[Autism Extraordinaire]

That is the point of dating isn’t it? If everyone did that, we would have this thread or the mass spergout

I've heard that you shouldn't talk about politics on the first date, because that can be a turnoff for people who have a life, on top of causing an argument. Of course, whoever told me that might be someone who cares more about being nice than actually addressing anything. I think it's better to rip the bandaid off in just about any situation.

 

[H3llonwheels]

I've heard that you shouldn't talk about politics on the first date, because that can be a turnoff for people who have a life, on top of causing an argument. Of course, whoever told me that might be someone who cares more about being nice than actually addressing anything. I think it's better to rip the bandaid off in just about any situation.

I agree that it is probably better. Men get themselves into a lot of trouble by not recognizing the warning signs upfront and just skipping the situation all together. Danger hair is not a meme

 

[Philier]

I've heard that you shouldn't talk about politics on the first date, because that can be a turnoff for people who have a life, on top of causing an argument. Of course, whoever told me that might be someone who cares more about being nice than actually addressing anything. I think it's better to rip the bandaid off in just about any situation.

"Would you like to have a cup of coffee? Maybe some tea? Also, did you know that Wiesenthal lied about the numbers?"
I doubt it'll work but please get video.

 

[Norbert the Tiger]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1540590179148148737

For some reason the look on the face of the woman in the bottom left at the beginning disgusts me. Not because I'm pro-choice/pro-life, but because the war is not yet won and they are already celebrating.
They will forget about this in a few months is my guess.

View attachment 3429167
But then on the opposite end, we have this:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1540509215587966976

View attachment 3429172
I want off this clown world.

Re the top video, sure is tough being an atheist right-winger in Amiland. I have a lot of problems with Christianity as an Abrhamaic religion, and there is some goody theatrics there, but on the other hand, I seem some real wife material there who will make some lucky man very happy.
The bottom vid shows just how disgusting our cultural milieu has become. Shit music, disgusting gyrating that is not even dancing, and shit people.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

that you might as well start litmus testing people on the first date to see if you can actually trust them enough to go any further with them.

Litmus testing people has always been the entire point behind the first date. If you weren't doing it, you are dating wrong,

 

[NyQuilninja]

I really hate this point that “we just want to let the states decide.” It is a sad argument because if abortion was illegal nationwide for the past 50 years, these religious nutters would most definitely not be using “state’s rights” as an arguing point.

No of course not. They’d be fighting against state’s ability to decide individually, claiming that federal law must be observed.

Sheeth cope and dilate
It's not the government's responsibility to constitutionally enshrine protecting people from their personal decisions. There's other alternatives before an abortion is even necessary. I haven't heard one legitimate argument as to why this is good not only for society as well as the individual's overall well-being.
Here's a short list
1. ) Birth control
2.) Condoms
3.) Spermicidal lubricant
4.) Levonorgestrel Emergency Contraception
5.) Self control

 

[Machine head]

Yes, I'm constantly terrified of laws against murder and rape being repealed because they're not rights specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

So long as you are fearful. Otherwise you may be murder raped.

 

[Dig20]

View attachment 3429109
>men follow a moral and religious code they believe in
>NOOOOOOO how could you do this to MEEEEEEEE

>be American "Christian"
>believe that there is a God and that He is omniscient, omnipotent, omni-benevolent, and the creator of the entire universe
>love Him
>believe the entire reason you exist is to worship God and enjoy him forever
>find out people think God says life begins at conception
>immediately "lose your love for God", because even if God himself thinks that abortion is bad, He must be wrong. despite the fact that He is infallible, all-knowing, all-seeing, benevolent, and the ultimate arbiter of moral law, despite the fact that it is literally impossible for Him to be wrong according to what you believe the laws of the universe are, He must somehow be incorrect because your faith in progressivism is stronger than your faith in your actual religion

also they forgot to capitalize God

 

[Jeff Gazetti]

I don't know if that article fit this thread but it's funny to read some tweets coming from progressists meltdowns about Obama and RBG.

https://conservativebrief.com/prog-64144/

RBG from hero to zero.

I agree but what’s to say Fog-horn Leg-horn (Mitch McConnell) wouldn’t have just held the seat hostage like he did with Garland?

Yes she should have retired but it probably wouldn’t have mattered.

 

[DicksOutForKiwigglers]

The mom accepted the consequence of carrying a child when she had unprotected sex. She again accepted the responsibility of raising the child when she didn't give it up after birth.
Having to live life with a mother that doesn't want you is almost always preferable to death. Only depressed losers who read shit written by pedos like Sartre think otherwise.
If we were to begin removing net drains on society I've got a whole list to do down, and at least those people have proven themselves to be losers. What you're proposing is killing someone for possibly becoming a net drain.

I cannot imagine being an atheist and still thinking death is a preferable alternative to a shitty life, because at least a shitty life is still life. Death is death. It is a black nothingness where no thought or sense of self exists. You cease to exist. There is no heaven, hell, just nothing. A void. Life may not always be great but at least you exist.

 

[Dave.]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1540590179148148737

For some reason the look on the face of the woman in the bottom left at the beginning disgusts me. Not because I'm pro-choice/pro-life, but because the war is not yet won and they are already celebrating.
They will forget about this in a few months is my guess.

View attachment 3429167
But then on the opposite end, we have this:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1540509215587966976

View attachment 3429172
I want off this clown world.

Okay I’m genuinely fucking curious, why do leftists and pro-choice activists of both genders look like shit? Even the kind of fat pro-lifers still have fair skin and decent complexions with full hair. Do leftists do drugs on the side or something? Or are vegan and soy filled diets really that detrimental to your health?