Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dude, you’re trying to flip this around.
If it is your solemn belief that abortions are bad. Then you are free to never engage in one. You are also free to openly protest, stand outside and scream at people coming and going.

It however is NOT ok to force others to walk the same way you do.

The only reason Roe was ever set in the first place is because too many hillbilly jeebus states were putting an hardship on women.

You don’t have to like it, but you don’t get to dictate it to others.

Despite being pro gun, I could make the same argument how banning guns could save lives.

Banning cars would too save from DUI fatality. Or even re ban alcohol, or both.

People die lotsa ways. The only reason religious loons even started to give a shit about abortions is because the whole fight against desegregation was becoming quite unpalatable in America during Jim Crow and this new abortion train was just the dart that landed on the board.
Problem is it is not just about you or the mother. It is about a child who has no say and cannot consent in its own life or death.
 
I've just seen an article about "what can tech giants do to overturn abortions ban". Those fucking morons, who just got fucked from giving the court the ability to make/remove laws, now want to do the same with bodies that somehow has even less responsibility.
Corporatism is the last redoubt of the shitlib. If something is unconstitutional or unpopular then they will just circumvent the process through "muh private business".
 
Feel bad for her kids.
1656282019165.png
 
Dude, you’re trying to flip this around.
If it is your solemn belief that abortions are bad. Then you are free to never engage in one. You are also free to openly protest, stand outside and scream at people coming and going.

It however is NOT ok to force others to walk the same way you do.

The only reason Roe was ever set in the first place is because too many hillbilly jeebus states were putting an hardship on women.

You don’t have to like it, but you don’t get to dictate it to others.

Despite being pro gun, I could make the same argument how banning guns could save lives.

Banning cars would too save from DUI fatality. Or even re ban alcohol, or both.

People die lotsa ways. The only reason religious loons even started to give a shit about abortions is because the whole fight against desegregation was becoming quite unpalatable in America during Jim Crow and this new abortion train was just the dart that landed on the board.
You may not like murdering orphans, then you free no never murder one. You are also free to openly protest, stand outside and scream at people coming and going.

It however is NOT ok to force others to walk the same way you do.
 
More TikTok cringe:










 
I genuinely want to know how men would react to a sex strike
It's called "being married for 10 years" :suffering:

You don’t have to like it, but you don’t get to dictate it to others.
We'll see, lol
I've just seen an article about "what can tech giants do to overturn abortions ban". Those fucking morons, who just got fucked from giving the court the ability to make/remove laws, now want to do the same with bodies that somehow has even less responsibility.
Like any of these fuckers were in danger of having reproductive sex
Pride_Parade_2017_show_up.max-1300x1300.png
 
I wasn't joking before. Women really do want the patriarchy back. Old-school courtship with no touching allowed. That legendary Twitter user was right, the Handmaids Tale is fetish material.

Not really women in general, just the least appealing ones, like the incels, who are mostly weak, ugly, poor, and dull guys, these ladies are the fatter, louder, and most annoying of the bunch. They know that their idealized version of the past is the only reality where they would get laid and the other person would not run as soon as the lights come on (if they ever get laid, to begin with).
 
They may seem cute when you first adopt them from the pet shop, but don't forget that they grow up to be niggers.
I have to disagree with you there.
I am of the opinion the state of the average (though not every) hood black in America is a product of nurture rather than nature.
(Note I do NOT believe gibs from the state can compensate for a healthy family upbringing)
 
I have to disagree with you there.
I am of the opinion the state of the average (though not every) hood black in America is a product of nurture rather than nature.
(Note I do NOT believe gibs from the state can compensate for a healthy family upbringing)
I figured the "pet shop" bit would tip people off that it was (mostly) tongue-in-cheek.
 
Men: close your legs whores! if you don't want to get pregnant then don't have sex. if you have a botched coathanger abortion then too bad, you're a baby murderer and you deserve to die

Also men: sex is VITAL for my survival. my self esteem rests on whether or not I've nutted in a girl recently. I am entitled to sex with beautiful women and if they don't fuck me by the third date, they're prudes and a waste of my time. I will stalk and harass women until I get what's owed to me... but it's also totally ok to ghost/discard women when they do have sex with me. if she gets pregnant from my sperm, that's her fuckin problem not mine, what is fatherhood?
...

I genuinely want to know how men would react to a sex strike. Would they applaud women for no longer being reckless baby murderers? Or will they rape and kill us for no longer being their willing whores?
You're talking about two different subsets of men, genius.
 
Disagree, attractive women have it the worst now. They have to put up with a bunch of dudes no where in their league hitting on them that obviously make them uncomfortable. Under a courtship system all of those guys would be filtered out by the family.
Aren't those attractive women also the most capable of extreme upward social mobility via marriage though?

You wouldn't have that kind of thing in a more "tradition" courtship system.
 
The only reason religious loons even started to give a shit about abortions is because the whole fight against desegregation was becoming quite unpalatable in America during Jim Crow and this new abortion train was just the dart that landed on the board.
This desegregation fight must have occurred around 400AD, then.

1656283290188.png
 
Aren't those attractive women also the most capable of extreme upward social mobility via marriage though?

You wouldn't have that kind of thing in a more "tradition" courtship system.
In a courtship system, wouldn't the most attractive women still be matched with the richest men?

What got me thinking about the discomfort women face is coming across an nigger influencer who goes around to colleges and basically forces women to make out with him who obviously don't want to, but they agree to because they want him to go away. Obviously an extreme example, but how many women would rather not have the expectation of physical contact even on an agreed to date.
 
They know that their idealized version of the past is the only reality where they would get laid and the other person would not run as soon as the lights come on (if they ever get laid, to begin with).
not entirely correct
that past would not simply have matched them with a partner, but would have also molded both them and that partner into a much better person in the first place, compared to how current year society fucks people up.
so the resulting relationship would not be a "woman hating neckbeard incel + man hating fat feminist" freakshow, but a much more workable "somewhat skinny shy guy + slightly chubby plain girl" pairing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back