Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
JUST IN - Pelosi, the speaker of the US House, labels the Supreme Court an "extremist" body that punishes the American people.

She's right, you know. They've been that way for years.

We should get a President to clean house at SCOTUS, appoint a bunch of new justices, and start overturning their bad decisions. Start with some of the older ones, and work our way up to the new ones...
 
they already seething at church rule but the question is a null answer.
if it was anything but Christianity it would not have gone to the supreme court.

1656364840449.png
1656364876123.png
 
I had a BLT sandwich teacher in middle school that was a little to open about LGBTness. Everyone just laughed. I assume kid's today are doing the same thing because Man chopping off cock=woman is absurd enough to be funny, especially to the young mind, though there will be the ones absorbing the fear mongering and other schizo junk because at home the parents are pushing the same thing onto them getting political with the kid.
It's worse in elementary/middle school I think, because parrents aren't so worried about preparing for college.
The worst we had was dumbass danger hair teacher in the social studies. Our English teacher was a classic liberal so that was pretty interesting.

Administration is usually a dumpsterfire now though. Bad admins make bad teachers worse. I remember when we got a decent principle in elementary and he absolutely cleaned house with the bullshit teachers the old nigger had there.
 
they already seething at church rule but the question is a null answer.
if it was anything but Christianity it would not have gone to the supreme court.

View attachment 3433512
View attachment 3433513
The fact it’s 6-3 on ideological lines just prove that this is the last push before Kentaji comes in and makes everything a tossup at best.

That particular case was a coach in Bremerton WA who would go pray after games were done, and a lot of his players would join him. Nothing was made an official team activity, no players were pressured into it. It was mostly the local school district freaking out that their students were religious, and demonstrating as such.
Washington. Figures.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Terrifik
they already seething at church rule but the question is a null answer.
if it was anything but Christianity it would not have gone to the supreme court.

View attachment 3433512
View attachment 3433513
Blah, blah, blah, the same old insults and insinuations they've been hurling since the Roe v Wade leak a few weeks ago that made no impact on anyone.

Gentlemen, you are looking at a completely buck-broken left, courtesy of the most based black man to ever live.
 
I was quite liberal compared to my parents in my late teens and twenties and have come back rightward since, but I don't know how much of that is me changing compared to the political landscape changing underneath me.

When I was 20, nobody was even thinking about troons giving sex hormones to children or putting them in drag shows.
Honestly somewhere between 2015 and 2020 the left went really really insane on the fringes to the point they're actually indoctrinating prepubescent kids.

@Kumquat To respond to your statement.
People are unhappy despite having all the conditions that can bring them luxury and perceived happiness. Instead most people are starting to realize a hyper consumer society without any moral or founding bedrocks leads to misery.

There is as reason why people thrive in religious societies. It's one of those ironies which is most progressive people are anti human despite throwing themselves in front of human rights.

On the bright side this might change things for the better.
 
they already seething at church rule but the question is a null answer.
if it was anything but Christianity it would not have gone to the supreme court.

View attachment 3433512

The trend jannies aren't even pretending to promote actual trends any more. They're just raging about whatever argument or FACT CHECK they want to go viral, but aren't smart or popular enough to get it organically.
 
Honestly somewhere between 2015 and 2020 the left went really really insane on the fringes to the point they're actually indoctrinating prepubescent kids.

@Kumquat To respond to your statement.
People are unhappy despite having all the conditions that can bring them luxury and perceived happiness. Instead most people are starting to realize a hyper consumer society without any moral or founding bedrocks leads to misery.

There is as reason why people thrive in religious societies. It's one of those ironies which is most progressive people are anti human despite throwing themselves in front of human rights.

On the bright side this might change things for the better.
People don't realize just how meaningful family and marriage can be. Think about it like this.

In your job? You are expendable. You are nothing but a cog in the machine. I work in a pretty high-demand field, I make pretty good cash, but at the end of the day, I know that if I quit, I'll be replaced within the week. There's a line of about several thousand people who can quite easily take my place. There's no meaning in that. No fulfilment.

In a marriage, however? As a father or a mother? You cannot be replaced. If you get married, become a parent, and then die? Your family is going to miss you, forever, and even if your spouse remarries, and the new parent is just as loving and caring as you were, your spouse and your kids are never going to be able to fully replace you. They will spend the rest of their lives with a massive you-shaped hole in their lives. Assuming you're a loving parent and not abusive, of course, but you get the point.
 
This faggot comes so close yet misses the mark.

Yes, the founders were not very big on abortion and sure as hell did not think it was a Constitutional right.

So? What was the question before the Supreme Court? If bans on abortion services violated the Constitution.

This fucker answered his own question and the Court could have only come to one conclusion.

As to rights and women, perhaps they should pass an amendment like women did with suffrage.
 
People don't realize just how meaningful family and marriage can be. Think about it like this.

In your job? You are expendable. You are nothing but a cog in the machine. I work in a pretty high-demand field, I make pretty good cash, but at the end of the day, I know that if I quit, I'll be replaced within the week. There's a line of about several thousand people who can quite easily take my place. There's no meaning in that. No fulfilment.

In a marriage, however? As a father or a mother? You cannot be replaced. If you get married, become a parent, and then die? Your family is going to miss you, forever, and even if your spouse remarries, and the new parent is just as loving and caring as you were, your spouse and your kids are never going to be able to fully replace you. They will spend the rest of their lives with a massive you-shaped hole in their lives. Assuming you're a loving parent and not abusive, of course, but you get the point.
It's not the government's role to enforce your personal feelings regarding morality or other people's behavior. A lot of marriages fail because the people can't get along so your whole premise isn't even true a good chunk of the time. The reason why this is a question at all is because a child's rights inside a womb are a legal gray area. It has nothing to do with your nanny stating which isn't that different to me than libtards wanting to ban sugar and fast food or police speech. In the United States, you can't dictate other people's behavior on that level.
 
Green Day has always been a bad band. I didn't like then since Dookie.
Close, but the correct answer is I never Green Day liked period. Green Day is probably the very worst in a long line of cringe 90s bands, and that is up against some pretty stiff competition. Green Day, U2, and Rage Against the Machine form the Triple Crown of awfulness.
 
Texas Senator John Cornyn posted this and his staff immediately had to go into damage control mode lmao. Did be think that if enough women start shrieking that we're going back to the 1950's, we might as well bring EVERYTHING back?View attachment 3433629
The 14th Amendment provided equal protection of the law to Blacks when it was ratified.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Harvey Danger
it can't survive outside of the womb, depends entirely on the mother, doesn't have conscience that it exists, nobody cares for it, it won't feel sad that it's being terminated.

Basically does nothing but sucks up the mother's nutrients and make her body harder to live in, without giving anything in return. It's everything people say about niggers except this time it's true.

IIRC the fetus will send cells to assist the mother if she suffers injury or illness after the first trimester when things stabilize. They are emergency batteries to a small extent. After all, if mom dies, they both die.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: LurkTrawl
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back