Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
The reaction to Dobbs overturning Roe and Casey is instructive in many different ways.

First, as I have stated so many times before, most just do not understand or do not care about the legal and Constitutional issues. Wanda Sykes was on Colbert last night dlecaring that this decision allows "that red stuff in the middle" to dictate what NY and California etc can do.


Such comments are breathtaking in their ignorance and stupidity, even for a blackie black like Wanda Sykes who cannot or chooses not to speak proper English. And yet millions of mainstreamers slog that shit down from their trusted television network.

Most of the plebs are just ignorant, should not be allowed to vote but I refuse to believe that Hillary and Pocahontas do not understand how Roe and Casey were on sound ground logically and legally, and that all this does is open this contentious issue up to the people to decided. So we have ruling elites who are lying through their teeth to gin up this fervor for political power.

We even see it here on this very thread, with the Hulkster, raptor and other clowns writing post after post about why this is bad, but really all they are doing is pleading their case as to why they favor abortion as a policy matter. That is all fine and good but it still does not answer why--if people still believe in democracy (I don't but most still do)-these policy preferences cannot be decided democratically, instead of by judicial fiat?

Beyond that, the reaction from AOC and others where they want the feds to come in and open abortion clinics should further dash any hope those of us who dissent from their bug eyed lunacy will ever be left alone. I do not think a peaceful breakup of the United States would be possible because they would seeth that the other side does what it does, be it enforce its borders and entertain sane immigration policies, allow so called hate speech, have something different than the on demand, free for all abortion policies they demand.

They cannot be reasoned with, they will not let those they disagree with "live and let live," which they pretend is their creed. Almost no one sees this. Those who dissent from AOC and Chelsea Handler and these bugeyed lunatics are still playing patty cake. They still think they have a right to their opinion and that although they disagree, if they lose in an election, well shucks, better luck next time. Meanwhile the left is consolidating power in so many ways, including a long haul ballot stuffing scheme, normalizing ideas that jettison first amendment and free speech principles, as they have even captured the military and law enforcement. They already impose a soft tyranny and they WILL impose a hard one the very nano second they can do so. Hear me now and believe me once it is too late.

The issue is that the cultural and media capitals are in Los Angeles and New York, plus a lot of ideologues from San Francisco being involved.

No wonder most of the media is super butthurt and bullshitting a lot about the ruling as well, since they gave up on appealing to Middle America since Reagan left office.

A hypothetical scenario is the GOP concentrating on the other 48 states or 45 at best, and leaving 5 states as containment chambers could work lol.

But this is basically New York and Calfornia lashing out hard since both rulings were bitchslaps by Thomas primarily, notice the amount of hate thrown at him, against both of them for being hysterical moonbat cunts that needed to be put in their place and know their place and role in the world and grand scheme of things and the universe.
 
That has nothing to do with what I was replying to, dude. Stop changing the subject. He said traveling to another state to get an abortion is no problem for poor people and I am saying it is indeed a problem. I have already explained to you, many times, why it's still an issue (with gerrymandering and all that). And, like I said, if your lovely GOP tries for a nation-wide abortion ban you'll be cheering it on despite your saying you want "MAH STATES RIGHTS" (which is always a cover for you right-wingers to take away rights)
This has EVERYTHING to do with it because the subject of this thread IS the two SCOTUS decisions that has leftist pigs working themselves up in a lather, seemingly in total and absolute ignorance as to what these decisions actually hold. In a strict sense it is not even about abortion at all, but about why abortion is not a constitutional right (which it is not). As a sidenote, Ruth Bader Ginsburg confided privately and not so privately that Roe was preposterous in its reasoning and clamored for national legislation to codify it.
That is what the thread is about, or should be about.
We get it. You and others strongly advocate for abortion as a policy matter. All the decision does is allow US citizens to engage on this matter in the political, democratic process. That means people like you, people who disagree with you, and people like me who have nuanced or conflicted positions on the matter can have a say.
Read the fucking decision, or at the very least intelligent, informed coverage of what this decisions means, what it is about, and why it overturns Roe Casey.
 
Last edited:
This has EVERYTHING to do with it because the subject of this thread IS the two SCOTUS decisions that has left pigs working themselves up in a lather, seeming in total and absolute ignorance as to what these decisions actually hold. In a strict sense it is not even about abortion at all, but about why abortion is not a constitutional right (which it is not). As a sidenote, Ruth Bader Ginsburg confided privately and not so privately that Roe was preposterous in its reasoning and clamored for national legislation to codify it.
That is what the thread is about, or should be about.
We get it. You and other strongly advocate for abortion as a policy matter. All the decision does is allow us citizens to engage on this matter in the political, democratic process. That means people like you, people who disagree with you, and people like me who have nuanced or conflicted positions on the matter.
Read the fucking decision, or at the very least intelligent, informed coverage of what this decisions means, what it is about, and why it overturns Roe Casey.
It doesn't have anything to do with what he said, other than they're both about abortion. He said poor people have no issue going to other states. I refuted that. You are spazzing out about how other states still have abortions and do it as they see fit.
You are correct, but that has absolutely nothing to do with helping poor people that can't affording abortions in other states.

I have explained to you, many times, why it's still a problem. Gerrymanding makes it so that the will of the people doesn't happen because your precious GOP still holds power even when they're the minority. That, and a national abortion ban is on the table according to McConnell (again, you want this to happen as you've stated). Plus states like TX and OK and ID making it illegal to go elsewhere for abortions (even though this is unconstitutional, you, despite claiming to want everything to be constitutional, love this idea).

So yes, it does matter. I've explained this to you a dozen times but you still can't seem to process it.
 
It doesn't have anything to do with what he said, other than they're both about abortion. He said poor people have no issue going to other states. I refuted that. You are spazzing out about how other states still have abortions and do it as they see fit.
The subject is the subject of this thread, not what one any one sperg or lunatic vomits on the keyboard.
You are correct, but that has absolutely nothing to do with helping poor people that can't affording abortions in other states.
Wrong. Either abortion is a Constitutional right, or it is not. If not—and it is not—then it is to be decided through the democratic, political process.

I have explained to you, many times, why it's still a problem. Gerrymanding makes it so that the will of the people doesn't happen because your precious GOP still holds power even when they're the minority. That, and a national abortion ban is on the table according to McConnell (again, you want this to happen as you've stated). Plus states like TX and OK and ID making it illegal to go elsewhere for abortions (even though this is unconstitutional, you, despite claiming to want everything to be constitutional, love this idea).

So yes, it does matter. I've explained this to you a dozen times but you still can't seem to process it.
More vomit about your stupid policy preferences and politics, replete with more bullshit that is not relevant (you want to talk about gerry-mandering, I want to talk about stolen elections and the long haul ballot stuffing scheme by the DNC which should give thosse opposed to the DNC cause belli to take the wheel and call the whole deal about democratic norms and accepting when the other side wins off). Neither is particularly relevant to this thread.
As for the rest, The GOP would be unwise to try and pass a national ban on abortion, but it is good that they can and that states can precisely because any sound interpretation of the Constiturion does not preclude this.
 
Last edited:
Abortion is indeed taking responsibility. Birth control can and does fail. You do know this, right, Eris?
You must think smashing your dog's head in is taking responsibility when you don't want it. Proper birth control usage has a low failure rate, sterilization and abstinence can't fail, adoption is an option too. They've chosen to participate in the reproductive process and risk pregnancy which is the natural result thereof.

Take responsibility, it's not difficult.

Most women would agree with me on abortion. Polls have said so.
Even if that's true it doesn't matter, there's still millions of women who know you support infanticide. Look how many people praise trannies, you think I'm going to suck the girldick because a mere poll might be on your side? :story:

Ironic coming from the evangelical fundie who believes whatever his megachurch pastor tells him (note: mods this is not a personal attack, it's literally true).
(note: mods im incapable of anything but ad hominem and strawmanning please forgive me)
 
This has EVERYTHING to do with it because the subject of this thread IS the two SCOTUS decisions that has left pigs working themselves up in a lather, seeming in total and absolute ignorance as to what these decisions actually hold. In a strict sense it is not even about abortion at all, but about why abortion is not a constitutional right (which it is not). As a sidenote, Ruth Bader Ginsburg confided privately and not so privately that Roe was preposterous in its reasoning and clamored for national legislation to codify it.
That is what the thread is about, or should be about.
We get it. You and other strongly advocate for abortion as a policy matter. All the decision does is allow us citizens to engage on this matter in the political, democratic process. That means people like you, people who disagree with you, and people like me who have nuanced or conflicted positions on the matter.
Read the fucking decision, or at the very least intelligent, informed coverage of what this decisions means, what it is about, and why it overturns Roe Casey.
His opinion on this is entirely emotionally driven.

"You don't care about the Constitution! You just hate women! You're a liar!"
 
His opinion on this is entirely emotionally driven.

"You don't care about the Constitution! You just hate women! You're a liar!"
In some ways I don't care about the Constitution because I think we have reached that point where democracy is about to fail--Starship Troopers and Franco and right-wing death sqauds and all that.

But to the extent that our system is still in power and that the Constitution and democracy are in effect, I do care, and I find it ironic that, in actuality, it is the majority opinion in Dobbs that actually proves itself as the good steward of the Constitution and the other side just wants to make shit up to get what they want.

There used to be a time when you could shame and embarass people with their ignorance. You think if anyone at that Union Squares rally with AOC was to ask if they read these decisions or understood them that it would do anything other than provoke some crazed hysteria reminiscent of a horror film?
 
You gotta understand and show some empathy for people's situations, HHH has an insider industry bias as a Janitor.
More babies in incubators = more to clean up after, and the women putting them there are wreaking havoc on more linens and floors in the process.

A vacuum in time saves nine 🧹
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevieLasVegas
I forgotten something important until now.

What does Ja Rule think about this ruling?
Untitled.jpg


LOL he was at an NFT conference but found the time for a retweet!
 
There's also the cost of the abortion. And traveling to another state. Rich people can afford those more easily
Every corporation is now paying slut's to abort their kids. Paying maternity is too expensive and has a huge negative affect on overall productivity rates. Get back to your fucking cage wagie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back