They've taken Russell's "they hate me because I'm disabled, not because I'm a deranged, malicious lunatic" argument and presented it in a way that's technically factual. It is true that we take amusement in the pain of disabled persons; however, the fact that Russell is disabled is incidental. You might as well say, "KiwiFarms takes amusement in the pain of people whose names start with 'R,'" or , "KiwiFarms takes amusement in the pain of people from Utah."
Translation: "It's not Russell's fault he insulted Skordas! After all, he's too dumb to understand how law stuff works and how to act like a civilized person. He promises he's really sorry." Oh, Russell! Don't let your counsel disrespect you like this!
I see they didn't include an explanation that "Russtard" is a portmanteau of "Russell" and "retard," like Russ has in previous filings.
It's also bullshit. Russ is pro se but he can hardly claim inexperience and has literally been told by every judge in every case he's filed in that his behavior is inappropriate, and the first time he pulled this "there will be blood," the judge was very clear he could be arrested for that kind of shit.
Not necessarily, a lot of cows are too drugged up to be in pain.
It's nearly five years since Rusty got smacked by a judge over threatening Skordas, and Russ is still sulking over it. Now that's amusing.
This is a good catch, and it's something we missed the first time through (we've seen all of the exhibits already). For example, his screenshot of Null's profile includes "Follow" and "Ignore," which aren't shown to unregistered guests.
The hunt begins.
Their firms have grand total of three people, two of which are working on Russ' case now. They are three friends who founded the firm.
Close to zero. Their arguments are increadibly shaky and rest completely on the 10th circuit adopting Perfect 10 and even then they are shaky (but less so)
They have actually! One of the members of the firm got his car towed, sued the state, and won! They also won two copyright cases one in the 9th circuit and one in 8th.
They can't really present new evidence on appeal (even though they blatenly did with new screenshots and the Null's genocide comment). I hope Skordas calls them out on that.
I don't think they included anything that wasn't previously filed. They included the supplemental brief that Russ attempted to file (docket item 31 & 31-1), which was denied & wasn't considered, but part of the appeal is that they're arguing Russ should've been granted leave to amend...
If only they could have avoided getting themselves into this predicament by, I don't know, looking at the case before taking it or something. Very sad, many such cases.
I kinda assumed they at least interned at another firm before founding Asshat, Asshat & Associate. I hope Shit Lips is begging them hard for a paralegal position, I think he would fit in well with their company.
Just checked, you are right. My bad
It's probably some methed-out woman running away who saw Russ's face and thought he was a zombie.
These kinds of angles and observations make me lean in the direction that Russ takes the bus and the whole car thing is bullshit, but I dunno. With how petty Russ is I imagine if the delivery driver thing happened he would have screenshot the no tip, but he doesn't know how to crop so it would reveal the app and his info. Waiting for whatever the fuck his July Announcement is and the chimpout when his lawsuits fail.
This appears to be the language used to conclude Russ had failed to state a claim for contributory infringement:
But if it didn't happen, it means he thinks pretending he's a 31-year-old pizzaboy who can't find the right address is a flex.
