US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220630-121054_Bromite.jpg
    Screenshot_20220630-121054_Bromite.jpg
    753 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
Kagan had a rare moment of clarity when she was writing up the dissidence for this case.
View attachment 3442704
Imagine on one hand saying democracy is as sacred as pride month and on the other hand saying we need to give the feds unilateral powers because the people elected are too stupid to do their jobs.

I mean, she isn’t wrong about Congress being stupid. But it’s their job to make laws, not unelected bureaucrats.
 
Hope y'all are ready to watch the Biden admin take a fresh legal ass reaming from SCOTUS and Thomas's BBC
View attachment 3442295

So is this that hostile SCOTUS thing you were talking about @Gehenna ? Is the ruling broad enough to kill congress tossing away their duties to unelected bureaucrats, or did they keep it narrow enough not to rock the boat?

Edit:

1656611011929.png


MSNBC's starting ringing the alarm bell, in any regard.
 
Better learn to pull weeds, coders. The email caste is about to learn that just filing TPS reports does not, in fact, make you a vital member of the economy. But the world always needs ditch diggers.
The "coders" don't know how to code to begin with. Big tech is american employees having diversity and sensitivity training and meetings and groups and making activist demands, then outsourcing the actual work to pajeets, SEAmonkeys and eastern europe for pennies.
 
So is this that hostile SCOTUS thing you were talking about @Gehenna ? Is the ruling broad enough to kill congress tossing away their duties to unelected bureaucrats, or did they keep it narrow enough not to rock the boat?
From my understanding, this only applies to the EPA's emissions law bullshit, for now. This opens the door for more 3-letter agencies to get the same long-deserved bitchslap.
 
So is this that hostile SCOTUS thing you were talking about @Gehenna ? Is the ruling broad enough to kill congress tossing away their duties to unelected bureaucrats, or did they keep it narrow enough not to rock the boat?

Edit:

View attachment 3442829

MSNBC's starting ringing the alarm bell, in any regard.
E922CB85-8025-4CB3-B111-34FBEFC4C599.jpeg

…and that’s a good thing.
 
February
View attachment 3442806

The Beginning of June
View attachment 3442807

As of now it went down like 7 cents, but we'll see how long that lasts
View attachment 3442810

Commiefornia still lookin like fuckin Big Bird over there though, and it's slowly takin over Nevada.

Pfft >5.82 doesn't really convey it. It's 6.59 at the cheap station here and I've seen it up to 7.19 for regular. Word from liberal costal hell is that it's gotten up to 11-something there.
 
Manchin and Sinema both say they will not nuke the filibuster to codify Roe v Wade.
"Senator Manchin's position has not changed," said Sam Runyon, spokeswoman for the senator. Hannah Hurley, spokeswoman for Sinema, referred Insider to an op-ed in the Washington Post that the senator wrote last summer, in which she said that ending the filibuster in a future Congress might result in wiping out funding for reproductive services.
LOL. Brandon proving ineffectual as usual. No refunds, harpies.
 
The "coders" don't know how to code to begin with. Big tech is american employees having diversity and sensitivity training and meetings and groups and making activist demands, then outsourcing the actual work to pajeets, SEAmonkeys and eastern europe for pennies.
That’s not true. Big Tech doesn’t outsource anything except for stuff like labeling for ML. Non-tech Fortune 500s outsource everything. What Big Tech does have though is a strong anti-American bias but that is related to who they hire, not outsourcing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back