U.S. doctors see spike in vasectomies following end of Roe v. Wade: report - Men who would expect their girlfriends to kill their children are sterilizing themselves; here's why that's a good thing

Source: https://globalnews.ca/news/8958704/us-vasectomy-increase-roe-v-wade/


By Kathryn Mannie Global News


1656612991096.png


Doctors across the U.S. are reporting a surge in requests for vasectomies following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Roe v. Wade legal precedent that once guaranteed the federal right to an abortion, according to The Washington Post.

70c8fc80

Doug Stein, a urologist from Florida, a state that recently banned abortion past 15 weeks’ gestation, told The Post that he used to get about four or five vasectomy requests a day. Following the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, that number has jumped to 12 to 18 requests.

“It was very, very noticeable Friday, and then the number that came in over the weekend was huge and the number that is still coming in far exceeds what we have experienced in the past,” Stein said.

“Many of the guys are saying that they have been thinking about a vasectomy for a while, and the Roe v. Wade decision was just that final factor that tipped them over the edge and made them submit the online registration.”

A vasectomy is a quick and non-invasive surgery that prevents sperm from mixing with semen and is almost 100 per cent effective at preventing pregnancy.

Around 500,000 vasectomies take place in the U.S. each year and are mostly performed on people who are already married with children. About six per cent of men get a vasectomy as a form of birth control compared to about 18 per cent of women who get their tubes tied to prevent pregnancy (despite tubal ligation being a more invasive and risky procedure).

For its part, Canada has one of the highest vasectomy rates in the world, with approximately 22 per cent of couples practicing birth control choosing vasectomies.

A 2015 United Nations report revealed that Canada has higher vasectomy rates than tubal ligation rates — one of the only industrialized nations to have that distinction.

Stein told The Washington Post that he had to open up more days in his schedule to accommodate all the new vasectomy requests after his practice became fully booked with appointments through to the end of August.


Stein and associate John Curington said that most people coming in to request a vasectomy cited the overturning of Roe v. Wade as a main factor.

“I’d say at least 60 or 70 per cent are mentioning the Supreme Court decision,” Curington told The Post. “And a few of them have such sophistication as young men that they actually are thinking about Justice Thomas and his opinion that contraception may fall next. And that’s shocking. That’s something that doesn’t enter into our conversations ever, until this week.”


Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his opinion on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that the court should not stop at just overturning Roe v. Wade.



“In future cases, we should reconsider all of this court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” Thomas wrote.

In 1965, Griswold v. Connecticut established a legal precedent for the use of contraception without government interference. The other two cases Thomas mentioned protect rights to same-sex marriage.




It’s not just urologists in Florida that are noticing this uptick in vasectomies. Philip Werthman, an L.A.-based urologist, told The Washington Post that the number of vasectomy consultations he has conducted recently has jumped by “300 to 400 per cent,” despite the fact that California has introduced a constitutional amendment to protect abortion access.

A urologist in Iowa, Esgar Guarín, reported to The Post a “200 to 250 per cent” increase in traffic to his website as people search for more information about vasectomies.

According to Guarín, there has been an overall upward trend in vasectomy requests in recent years, but this spike is significant — saying, “the overall upward trend continues but the dramatic bumps don’t.”

New York urologist Marc Goldstein used to perform plenty of vasectomy reversals, but is now seeing the opposite.


Read more: Boy, 4, given accidental vasectomy during hernia surgery, Texas lawsuit says

“Now it’s the other way around,” he told The Washington Post. “So it’s been a dramatic shift. And this (Supreme Court decision) is only going to further impact that in terms of increasing requests.”


What patients have to say​

Seattle-based Greg Thomas said he had toyed with the idea of getting a vasectomy for some time, but the overturning of Roe v. Wade was the straw that broke the camel’s back. His partner has cerebral palsy, meaning a pregnancy would pose a serious risk to her health.

“I have long felt that birth control should be something penis-havers take more responsibility in, and nipping the problem in the bud seems the most logical. Even though I live in a state where abortion will still be legal, I do not want to ever put my partner in a position to risk her life, especially for something I can prevent,” he told Buzzfeed News.

Sean Sullivan of Boston told Buzzfeed News that he wanted to get a vasectomy as soon as the Supreme Court’s draft opinion on Roe v. Wade was leaked.

“I had a vasectomy literally this morning at 9 a.m., an hour before the announcement of the Supreme Court’s decision. Took 20 minutes and a $60 co-pay,” he said.

“I am a married father of twins, and my wife and I made the decision so that my wife did not have to obtain another IUD or other form of birth control,” Sullivan told Buzzfeed News. “10 out of 10. Would recommend.”
 
“Many of the guys are saying that they have been thinking about a vasectomy for a while, and the Roe v. Wade decision was just that final factor that tipped them over the edge and made them submit the online registration.”
Nuh uh, I think it's the harpies in their personal lives pushing them into this decision. If these men were really thinking seriously about it, they would've gotten it done on their own terms ages ago instead of having to rely on a SCOTUS hearing to make up their minds for them.

Betacucks can't even take themselves out of the gene pool without having to be told they needed to do it.
 
as much as i hear how super safe an effective it is from women (and men who wish to be women) it seems highly risky to do it several times in a lifespan (knowing shitty doctors) and it also feels weird its always women talking about men's bodies and reproductive organs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Do condoms not exist or something? I feel like there is a cheap and easy method of preventing unwanted pregnancy and it comes in a wrapper.

Doesn't always work. Penis+vagina=baby. Which is why there's always some risk to stick it in. My aunt was on those depro shots, had an IUD and used pills (at different times of course). She got pregnant each time. And yes she was married. So on the third baby she got her tubes cut and burned.

Always a risk. Don't forget that. This abortion lunacy won't have anything good come of it. Oh well. More content for Tard Baby General.
It's a weird case where both sides have similar outcomes but different problems. I have heard of women being unable to get themselves sterilized before but that doesn't seem to be hinged on the assumption that the doctor will get in trouble with the husband.

In the end both sexes lose their ability to self sterilize, but one has it locked behind a 3rd party while the other has it locked behind... I guess an age restriction? Since there's not a clear homework assignment to just get mommy wifey to sign a permission slip.

As for which is worse... It depends? In one sense women have it worse because they can't do anything to meet the doctor's requirements, because there are none laid out. But in another, men have it worse because their autonomy is delegated to someone else. I've even heard of unwed men without wife's being barred from procedures because getting the snip might help them facilitate some kind of fraud? Really depends where in life you are I suppose.

In this case with them trying to tie it to Roe v Wade I find it relevant that men's reproductive choices are limited by women. The hypocrisy makes the story all the more ludicrous.


Agreed. I'd be OK with them requiring extra papers signed to avoid lawsuits, or with doctors offering a new "certificate of fertility" service if fraud via infertility is such an issue. Such a certificate would be weird, but I'd put it about on the same level as people using their STD tests as a license to orgy. It makes sense for some people and if you don't need it, ignore it. I can understand some CYA red tape.

But at the end of the day, yes, if they offer the service then patients should be able to opt to self sterilize.

"If they offer the service" because I'm ok with doctors never performing the service, I've just got problems with them deciding for their patients which ones have to stay fertile and which don't. I'm not going to say they have to offer the service to keep a qualification but if they do then they shouldn't play favorites.

Seems they don't want to do it even if there's a medical issue. There was that woman in the UK who had such severe endometriosis that she was bleeding like crazy and had anemia. She told doctors that she was a lesbian and didn't want kids. No go. So finally she said she was trooning out and they yeeted the uterus right away.There was a thread on it a year or so ago.

I'm on the fence about an informed consent similar to troon surgery because dumb youth may just find another way to sterilize themselves for stupid reasons. But I'm all for doing something when a woman has a severely fucked uterus and just wants it out so she can live a normal life.
 
They should pay bugmen to do this. Vasectomies are cheaper than decades of abortions, birth control pills, and IUDs.
And does anyone remember the stories of women who stopped using birth control and immediately started hating the way their bug husbands looked, smelled, etc? Women need to healed hormonally.
 
These men don't understand:

They don't care if they get pregnant, they just want to kill babies.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Ophelia
I’m all for this. If men are willing to shoulder contraception, women lose one more safeguard against shirking responsibility for their own decisions.

Also I’m all for the relegitimization of Buck v. Bell
 
  • Deviant
Reactions: Ophelia
Doesn't always work. Penis+vagina=baby. Which is why there's always some risk to stick it in. My aunt was on those depro shots, had an IUD and used pills (at different times of course). She got pregnant each time. And yes she was married. So on the third baby she got her tubes cut and burned
Still better than pullout method. You can stack contraceptive effects too by consuming birth control and condoms for extra protection. Personally I always use buffing spells and a few potions if I lack enough mana for the spells as compensation.
 
Back