As Ohio restricts abortions, 10-year-old girl travels to Indiana for procedure

Link (Archive - http://archive.today/ravJs)

On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.

Could Bernard help?

Indiana lawmakers are poised to further restrict or ban abortion in mere weeks. The Indiana General Assembly will convene in a special session July 25 when it will discuss restrictio ns to abortion policy along with inflation relief.


But for now, the procedure still is legal in Indiana. And so the girl soon was on her way to Indiana to Bernard's care.

Indiana abortion laws unchanged, but effect still felt across state​

While Indiana law did not change last week when the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking Dobbs decision, abortion providers here have felt an effect, experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of patients coming to their clinics from neighboring states with more restrictive policies.


Since Friday, the abortion clinics where Dr. Katie McHugh, an independent obstetrician-gynecologists works have seen “an insane amount of requests” from pregnant people in Kentucky and Ohio, where it is far more difficult to get an abortion.
A ban on abortions after six weeks took effect on last week in Ohio. Last Friday the two abortion providers in Kentucky shut their doors after that state’s trigger law banning abortions went into effect.
Indiana soon could have similar restrictions.
That pains doctors like Bernard.
“It’s hard to imagine that in just a few short weeks we will have no ability to provide that care,” Bernard said.

For now, Indiana abortion providers have been fielding more calls from neighboring states. Typically about five to eight patients a day might hail from out of state, said McHugh, who works at multiple clinics in central and southern Indiana. Now, the clinics are seeing about 20 such patients a day.

Kentucky patients have been coming to Indiana in higher numbers since earlier this spring when more restrictive laws took effect there, McHugh said.

Indianapolis abortion clinics seeing surge in patients from Ohio, Kentucky​


A similar dynamic is at play at Women’s Med, a medical center that performs abortions in Indianapolis that has a sister center in Dayton, Ohio. In the past week, they have doubled the number of patients they treat for a complete procedure, accepting many referrals from their Ohio counterpart.

More than 100 patients in Dayton had to be scheduled at the Indianapolis facility, a representative for Women’s Med, wrote in an email to IndyStar.

Women and pregnant people are “crying, distraught, desperate, thankful and appreciative,” the representative wrote.

The two centers are working together to route patients to Indianapolis for a termination after a pre-op appointment in Dayton. In recent months, they have also had people from southern states, like Texas, come north for a procedure.

Many patients, particularly from Ohio and Kentucky, are seeking care through Women’s Med while also making multiple appointments in other states so if one state closes down, they will still have some options, the representative wrote.

The center is advising pregnant people with a positive pregnancy test to book an appointment even though prior to the Supreme Court ruling they asked people to wait until their six-week mark to do so.

For years people have traversed state lines for abortions, particularly if a clinic across the border is closer to their home than the nearest in-state facility.

In 2021, 465, or about 5.5% of the more than 8,400 abortions performed, were done on out-of-state residents, according to the Indiana Department of Health's most recent terminated pregnancy report. More than half, 264, lived in Kentucky and 40 in Ohio.

Midwestern residents can also travel to Illinois, where abortion is likely to remain legal even in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling but for many Indiana is closer and until the lawmakers pass any measure to the contrary, abortion will be legal here.

Still, it remains murky what the future holds.

Thursday a lower court ruled that abortions could resume, at least for now, in Kentucky. On Wednesday abortion clinics in Ohio filed suit, saying that state’s new ban was unconstitutional.

In Indiana lawmakers have declined to provide specifics of what measures any abortion legislation considered here might contain.

For now, then, abortion providers are doing their best to accommodate all Hoosier patients as well those from neighboring states.

“We are doing the best we can to increase availability and access as long as we can, knowing that this will be a temporary time frame that we can offer that assistance,” McHugh said.
 
Last edited:
Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.
23008-caitlin-bernard.png
FACULTY
Caitlin Bernard, MD, MS
Assistant Professor of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
Do doctors usual dual class as professors? I thought people were either academics or industry, but it's not like I know each industry.

Caitlin Bernard, MD is a family planning fellowship-trained obstetrician and gynecologist. Her clinical interests are in contraception, abortion and miscarriage care, in addition to general obstetrics and gynecology. Her research interests include improving access to contraception and understanding how to decrease unintended pregnancy and improve pregnancy outcomes. She has worked in Kenya for the past four years through the AMPATH/IUSM-Kenya partnership. There she is engaged in care, teaching and research programs, including improving access to contraception, early pregnancy care and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
I'd like the lady more if the article had introduced her as being pro-contraceptives too. Setting aside her apparent lack of concern for getting the rapist convicted, she seems like she might be a person capable of finding a reasonable balance between condoms being unstoppable and abortions being fun.

Her working Kenya is sus however, given what I know about abortionists and eugenicists.



Since Friday, the abortion clinics where Dr. Katie McHugh, an independent obstetrician-gynecologists works have seen “an insane amount of requests” from pregnant people in Kentucky and Ohio, where it is far more difficult to get an abortion.
Honestly not interested in her because she sounds like a random person. I'm only really interested in WHO THE FUCK SEES A PREGNANT PRE-TEEN AND DOESN'T CARE ABOUT THE RAPIST? She could be interesting though. Or maybe it's a more common name than I realize.

First search result for the name

Screenshot_20220702-133951.jpg


took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

I think this fucker might actually not be named in the article, meaning the doctor gets more privacy than the underage rape victim. I don't even know who to even scream CALL CPS at now.

I mean, I get that the girl isn't named either, but we know she's a cishet 10 year old female. We don't even know the doctor's pgps.
 
Last edited:
"pregnant people"

Seriously, though, I want to know who the "father" is and I want to see him swinging from a tree.
He's currently swinging from a tree talking to horrified teenagers about losing his virginity before them.

Or it was a pedo the girl's family knew and they're keeping it secret so she can coup de grace him.
 
Okay, but it makes me think Indiana is going to ban it now.

I'm actually surprised we didn't have a trigger law in place. We couldn't sell or buy alcohol on Sundays for the longest time FFS

Ain't it strange that people who are most pro abortion are also the ones most pro pedophilia?
They love having a discreet way to erase the evidence.
 
I'm sorry, but I'm doubting the validity of this story. How was this girl discovered? Did you contact the authorities, or did law enforcement contact you? Where are her parents? Were they arrested? Is there an investigation?
I get that doctor's have to protect their patient's privacy but considering that this girl's case is barely brushed upon in the article (despite being the literall headline) makes me think that this story was made up to pull at people's heart strings.
I hope I'm right.
 
I'm glad they're doing the right thing here by trying to help her, but I'm afraid to say if she's at the point of being pregnant that she probably already has some form of irreparable mental trauma and the abortion isn't going to fix it.
Well, if her life is in danger then it's necessary obviously, but otherwise it can only add to her trauma.
 
even the most staunch prolifer in the US will tell you that abortion for a 10year old is okay. For one, its clearly hazardous to her health and the baby's health. And two, its clearly fucking rape. Only retarded sand nigger, rural pajeet and hardcore latinos will be agaisnt abortion in such case.

The overtuning of RoeVWade is good, but hopefully most states will polish their ban with exceptions for such a cases.
 
A 10 year old girl? Are there not confidentiality rules doctors have to follow? HIPAA? Shouldn't there be even more due care being made not to reveal potentially identifying information for a minor? This all seems awfully convenient that the almost perfect example against RvW being overturned pops up like this, and to hell with any sort of trauma/attention/etc that a 10 year old child might incur by being brought into the media spotlight.
"Ten year old girl" is not identifying information. There is absolutely zero chance of the child being identified from that.

There are a lot of ten year old girls, and a non-trivial number of them are rape victims.
 
Back