As Ohio restricts abortions, 10-year-old girl travels to Indiana for procedure

Link (Archive - http://archive.today/ravJs)

On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.

Could Bernard help?

Indiana lawmakers are poised to further restrict or ban abortion in mere weeks. The Indiana General Assembly will convene in a special session July 25 when it will discuss restrictio ns to abortion policy along with inflation relief.


But for now, the procedure still is legal in Indiana. And so the girl soon was on her way to Indiana to Bernard's care.

Indiana abortion laws unchanged, but effect still felt across state​

While Indiana law did not change last week when the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking Dobbs decision, abortion providers here have felt an effect, experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of patients coming to their clinics from neighboring states with more restrictive policies.


Since Friday, the abortion clinics where Dr. Katie McHugh, an independent obstetrician-gynecologists works have seen “an insane amount of requests” from pregnant people in Kentucky and Ohio, where it is far more difficult to get an abortion.
A ban on abortions after six weeks took effect on last week in Ohio. Last Friday the two abortion providers in Kentucky shut their doors after that state’s trigger law banning abortions went into effect.
Indiana soon could have similar restrictions.
That pains doctors like Bernard.
“It’s hard to imagine that in just a few short weeks we will have no ability to provide that care,” Bernard said.

For now, Indiana abortion providers have been fielding more calls from neighboring states. Typically about five to eight patients a day might hail from out of state, said McHugh, who works at multiple clinics in central and southern Indiana. Now, the clinics are seeing about 20 such patients a day.

Kentucky patients have been coming to Indiana in higher numbers since earlier this spring when more restrictive laws took effect there, McHugh said.

Indianapolis abortion clinics seeing surge in patients from Ohio, Kentucky​


A similar dynamic is at play at Women’s Med, a medical center that performs abortions in Indianapolis that has a sister center in Dayton, Ohio. In the past week, they have doubled the number of patients they treat for a complete procedure, accepting many referrals from their Ohio counterpart.

More than 100 patients in Dayton had to be scheduled at the Indianapolis facility, a representative for Women’s Med, wrote in an email to IndyStar.

Women and pregnant people are “crying, distraught, desperate, thankful and appreciative,” the representative wrote.

The two centers are working together to route patients to Indianapolis for a termination after a pre-op appointment in Dayton. In recent months, they have also had people from southern states, like Texas, come north for a procedure.

Many patients, particularly from Ohio and Kentucky, are seeking care through Women’s Med while also making multiple appointments in other states so if one state closes down, they will still have some options, the representative wrote.

The center is advising pregnant people with a positive pregnancy test to book an appointment even though prior to the Supreme Court ruling they asked people to wait until their six-week mark to do so.

For years people have traversed state lines for abortions, particularly if a clinic across the border is closer to their home than the nearest in-state facility.

In 2021, 465, or about 5.5% of the more than 8,400 abortions performed, were done on out-of-state residents, according to the Indiana Department of Health's most recent terminated pregnancy report. More than half, 264, lived in Kentucky and 40 in Ohio.

Midwestern residents can also travel to Illinois, where abortion is likely to remain legal even in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling but for many Indiana is closer and until the lawmakers pass any measure to the contrary, abortion will be legal here.

Still, it remains murky what the future holds.

Thursday a lower court ruled that abortions could resume, at least for now, in Kentucky. On Wednesday abortion clinics in Ohio filed suit, saying that state’s new ban was unconstitutional.

In Indiana lawmakers have declined to provide specifics of what measures any abortion legislation considered here might contain.

For now, then, abortion providers are doing their best to accommodate all Hoosier patients as well those from neighboring states.

“We are doing the best we can to increase availability and access as long as we can, knowing that this will be a temporary time frame that we can offer that assistance,” McHugh said.
 
Last edited:
Abortionists are chomping at the bit to perform them like @Mothra1988 , and few would question the procedure in this case, so I don't think that's a likely scenario. If it's deemed medically necessary she'll get one, and probably still will even if it's not. If the rapist is her father or something he'll be sure to insist upon it.
You're way too invested in defending child rape pregnancies. Yes, this is a normal hill someone who is not fucked in the head or has some other questionable motivation would want to die on.
 
You're way too invested in defending child rape pregnancies. Yes, this is a normal hill someone who is not fucked in the head or has some other questionable motivation would want to die on.
Says the retard LARPing as a rape victim himself in a rape thread. Fuck off baby killing degenerate, project your predatory behavior elsewhere.
 
Is it concerning how I can't believe much about what's in the news anymore, even when it's something like this?
Wouldn't be surprised if this story fades out without the name/arrest of the pedophile rapist ever being mentioned, despite it generating millions of outrage clicks.
 
Is it concerning how I can't believe much about what's in the news anymore, even when it's something like this?
Wouldn't be surprised if this story fades out without the name/arrest of the pedophile rapist ever being mentioned, despite it generating millions of outrage clicks.
This is what happens when media knowingly LIE.
 
Says the retard LARPing as a rape victim himself in a rape thread. Fuck off baby killing degenerate, project your predatory behavior elsewhere.
I like that your immediate defense when a female CSA victim calls you out for talking about CSA victims in the third person as a petty and autistic debate point completely devoid of humanity, assuming you KNOW as a man what that would feel like and can make the decision for her, is to call me a liar. A lot of denying of CSA going on here. Gee, I wonder who would have motivation to do that?

And like I would give enough of a fuck what some guy who was told by Josh to stop being so autistic thinks to even make up something like that in a repeat of an argument we already had three months ago or whatever. As far as abortion goes, you don't even understand my position. I'm a moderate on it, but irregardless, stay away from kids dude. lol
 
I think using outlier cases like this to promote abortions for all is kinda sick. Sure some edgy angel baby christians who demand every pregnancy is protected exist even if the baby comes out without a fucking brain, but that isn’t the argument of 98% of pro lifers so stop strawmanning it like it is.
 
I like that your immediate defense when a female CSA victim calls you out for talking about CSA victims in the third person as a petty and autistic debate point completely devoid of humanity, assuming you KNOW as a man what that would feel like and can make the decision for her, is to call me a liar. A lot of denying of CSA going on here. Gee, I wonder who would have motivation to do that?

And like I would give enough of a fuck what some guy who was told by Josh to stop being so autistic thinks to even make up something like that in a repeat of an argument we already had three months ago or whatever. As far as abortion goes, you don't even understand my position. I'm a moderate on it, but irregardless, stay away from kids dude. lol
"I don't care what you think, here's a bunch of autistic screeching to prove it!" :story:
 
God damn this thread makes me want to drink myself to death.
1656809994603.png
 
Then why aren't there exceptions written into the law for cases like this so child rape victims don't have to travel out of state?
1656810757800.png

Something smells rotten. A 10 year old shouldn't have to leave the entirety of Ohio for this. To be specific: no doctor in the States is going to claim that a child that probably only had her menarche is capable of giving birth to a child without a substantial risk of death.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3450568
Something smells rotten. A 10 year old shouldn't have to leave the entirety of Ohio for this. To be specific: no doctor in the States is going to claim that a child that probably only had her menarche is capable of giving birth to a child without a substantial risk of death.

No one is going to perform an abortion in these states outside of an immediate life threatening emergency. Not until/unless the legislature gives a list of qualifying conditions that result in immediate dismissal by a judge.
 
Back