As Ohio restricts abortions, 10-year-old girl travels to Indiana for procedure

Link (Archive - http://archive.today/ravJs)

On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.

Could Bernard help?

Indiana lawmakers are poised to further restrict or ban abortion in mere weeks. The Indiana General Assembly will convene in a special session July 25 when it will discuss restrictio ns to abortion policy along with inflation relief.


But for now, the procedure still is legal in Indiana. And so the girl soon was on her way to Indiana to Bernard's care.

Indiana abortion laws unchanged, but effect still felt across state​

While Indiana law did not change last week when the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking Dobbs decision, abortion providers here have felt an effect, experiencing a dramatic increase in the number of patients coming to their clinics from neighboring states with more restrictive policies.


Since Friday, the abortion clinics where Dr. Katie McHugh, an independent obstetrician-gynecologists works have seen “an insane amount of requests” from pregnant people in Kentucky and Ohio, where it is far more difficult to get an abortion.
A ban on abortions after six weeks took effect on last week in Ohio. Last Friday the two abortion providers in Kentucky shut their doors after that state’s trigger law banning abortions went into effect.
Indiana soon could have similar restrictions.
That pains doctors like Bernard.
“It’s hard to imagine that in just a few short weeks we will have no ability to provide that care,” Bernard said.

For now, Indiana abortion providers have been fielding more calls from neighboring states. Typically about five to eight patients a day might hail from out of state, said McHugh, who works at multiple clinics in central and southern Indiana. Now, the clinics are seeing about 20 such patients a day.

Kentucky patients have been coming to Indiana in higher numbers since earlier this spring when more restrictive laws took effect there, McHugh said.

Indianapolis abortion clinics seeing surge in patients from Ohio, Kentucky​


A similar dynamic is at play at Women’s Med, a medical center that performs abortions in Indianapolis that has a sister center in Dayton, Ohio. In the past week, they have doubled the number of patients they treat for a complete procedure, accepting many referrals from their Ohio counterpart.

More than 100 patients in Dayton had to be scheduled at the Indianapolis facility, a representative for Women’s Med, wrote in an email to IndyStar.

Women and pregnant people are “crying, distraught, desperate, thankful and appreciative,” the representative wrote.

The two centers are working together to route patients to Indianapolis for a termination after a pre-op appointment in Dayton. In recent months, they have also had people from southern states, like Texas, come north for a procedure.

Many patients, particularly from Ohio and Kentucky, are seeking care through Women’s Med while also making multiple appointments in other states so if one state closes down, they will still have some options, the representative wrote.

The center is advising pregnant people with a positive pregnancy test to book an appointment even though prior to the Supreme Court ruling they asked people to wait until their six-week mark to do so.

For years people have traversed state lines for abortions, particularly if a clinic across the border is closer to their home than the nearest in-state facility.

In 2021, 465, or about 5.5% of the more than 8,400 abortions performed, were done on out-of-state residents, according to the Indiana Department of Health's most recent terminated pregnancy report. More than half, 264, lived in Kentucky and 40 in Ohio.

Midwestern residents can also travel to Illinois, where abortion is likely to remain legal even in the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling but for many Indiana is closer and until the lawmakers pass any measure to the contrary, abortion will be legal here.

Still, it remains murky what the future holds.

Thursday a lower court ruled that abortions could resume, at least for now, in Kentucky. On Wednesday abortion clinics in Ohio filed suit, saying that state’s new ban was unconstitutional.

In Indiana lawmakers have declined to provide specifics of what measures any abortion legislation considered here might contain.

For now, then, abortion providers are doing their best to accommodate all Hoosier patients as well those from neighboring states.

“We are doing the best we can to increase availability and access as long as we can, knowing that this will be a temporary time frame that we can offer that assistance,” McHugh said.
 
Last edited:
Because the legislature said you have to wait.
So doctors should wait until a pregnant child - who is still very much growing and needing of vital nutrients to facilitate healthy growth of their body - is however many months along (wouldn't be surprised if they'd make it to full term) and in labor where they'd most likely have to perform a cesarean section because the child isn't mature enough body-wise to push out a 6+lb baby?

Pregnancy is daunting enough in an adult woman, not to mention all the shit women deal with afterwards. Honestly, I think it's really twisted to make a child carry a child; one would assume it would absolutely wreck their bodies on a chemical level.
 
So doctors should wait until a pregnant child - who is still very much growing and needing of vital nutrients to facilitate healthy growth of their body - is however many months along (wouldn't be surprised if they'd make it to full term) and in labor where they'd most likely have to perform a cesarean section because the child isn't mature enough body-wise to push out a 6+lb baby?

Pregnancy is daunting enough in an adult woman, not to mention all the shit women deal with afterwards. Honestly, I think it's really twisted to make a child carry a child; one would assume it would absolutely wreck their bodies on a chemical level.

I do not know if that was the intent of the law. Laws with good intent have unintended consequences all the time.

If Ohio didn't intend this they can amend their law at any time to include a specific exception for children under the age of legal consent.
 
It may have happened, but what really activates my almonds is the dating of the pregnancy. Normally you have to test positive and then there is still a delay in getting a dating ultrasound unless there is a medical emergency. Which there might have been, but the article is very vague which makes me think it is either bullshit or very coincidentally real.
And even a tentative date is based on the last period which you wouldn't expect a 10-year-old to be too on top of.
I mean I have heard it happening to girls as young as 8. It is...not good.
You ladies really need to put the fork down.
 
Can anyone explain how a 10 year old child, who didn't even start going through luberty, got pregnant? Shouldn't there be periods going on? Ovulation and shit?
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Mrs Paul and BSC
Can anyone explain how a 10 year old child, who didn't even start going through luberty, got pregnant? Shouldn't there be periods going on? Ovulation and shit?
Puberty for girls starts at insanely early ages because nutrition is far better these days. As soon as you have a period, you are ovulating, and yes a pedo absolutely can knock you up. Same is happening to boys but at a delayed rate compared to girls. This is the theory behind puberty blockers. Not to troon out but because precocious puberty is a real problem.
 
And even a tentative date is based on the last period which you wouldn't expect a 10-year-old to be too on top of.
This is why I think if this story even is true, it was just coincidence it was caught so early, not because a 4th or 5th grader thought she was pregnant. That requires a more mature mind than I think most 10 year olds would have, even if abused. Thing also is, maybe this was going to be her first period and she never knew she was even going to have one except the pedo knocked her up first try on her first egg.

At anyrate, I am generally against the death penalty, but in these cases, we should have it and it should be completely public. I really hate that we have the death penalty but it is all hush hush. Either have it public or don't do it.
 
Since they haven't named the father yet, I assume either this story is made up, or that the father is also a child.
Often, nobody can talk about the active legal proceedings. No doubt it was a family friend or relative. These stories are not particularly rare, they just aren't reported on in the interest of protecting the child from further harm via media circus.
Can anyone explain how a 10 year old child, who didn't even start going through luberty, got pregnant? Shouldn't there be periods going on? Ovulation and shit?
I grew up in foster care. There were ten kids in the house, all of us females, eight of them black. Black females seem to be particularly susceptible to early puberty. My nine year old sisters had underarm hair, FULL bush, budding breasts and their periods. At nine! (none of them obese, fyi). I didn't have mine until 14. I've also seen abnormally large genitalia on black females also, with abnormally large clitoris and labia featuring prominently. I'd be very interested to see a study on this, but I can't imagine it being funded given that it could somehow be construed as a racism.

EDIT: It's worth mentioning that black females are often sexualized very early, and often treated with disdain and disgust by their mothers for being 'fast'. It's a part of black culture that is rarely discussed.
 
This is why I think if this story even is true, it was just coincidence it was caught so early, not because a 4th or 5th grader thought she was pregnant. That requires a more mature mind than I think most 10 year olds would have, even if abused. Thing also is, maybe this was going to be her first period and she never knew she was even going to have one except the pedo knocked her up first try on her first egg.
My assumption was she was being raped regularly. Her mother probably only learned about the rape because of the pregnancy. I can't imagine her doctors not wanting the parents to pregnancy test if they brought her to be tested for STDs and other ick.

Assuming it happened, assuming she could have gotten the abortion locally, for Ohio's law to apply the fetus had to have a detectable heartbeat.
 
My assumption was she was being raped regularly. Her mother probably only learned about the rape because of the pregnancy. I can't imagine her doctors not wanting the parents to pregnancy test if they brought her to be tested for STDs and other ick.

Assuming it happened, assuming she could have gotten the abortion locally, for Ohio's law to apply the fetus had to have a detectable heartbeat.
No, my assumption is that the mother or whomever found out that she was being raped and when they took her to the doctor to confirm that she was sexually abused, it just happened that she was pregnant, not that the kid thought she was pregnant. Just 6 weeks is really early and even if the kid had the foresight to track her periods, assuming she even had one before, periods are very irregular when things are just getting started. Probably part of why a lot of pedos prefer boys.
 
This whole fucking thread of abortion sperging and there is still no information on who raped the girl and what their backgrounds are?

I dont know if I am disappointed this case is being kept tight to keep information leaking out or really starting to believe this is a fake as fuck story and not Raul impregnating his ten year old cousin because that's what he was raised to do.
 
Last edited:
I feel like in a situation where there's a pregnant ten year old, finding a way to get her to wherever they need to for an abortion is probably not going to be an issue considering that I'm assuming she's already with law enforcement or some state agency. The transportation is probably relatively simple compared to the whole WHO THE FUCK IMPREGNANTED A TEN YEAR OLD part.
I think the issue isn't the "omg look at this poor girl who had to travel state line to get abortion" but more of "oh my God who the fuck impregnated her and how do we bring this sick fuck to justice." instead "noooo wut bout little kid pregnancy"

Seriously though. The current influx of abortions are done by people who were gonna do it anyway but held on to whatever the fuck reason. Now they are rushing to get it done.

Once that is over, people should now know the timeframe in which their abortions are allowed and restricted.
 
Puberty for girls starts at insanely early ages because nutrition is far better these days. As soon as you have a period, you are ovulating, and yes a pedo absolutely can knock you up. Same is happening to boys but at a delayed rate compared to girls. This is the theory behind puberty blockers. Not to troon out but because precocious puberty is a real problem.
They already tried treating precocious puberty with blockers. It led to osteoporosis and bone cancer in their late twenties and early thirties. The most famous is Lupron which was a drug meant as a last resort to extend the life of terminal prostate cancer patients. They do still use inhibitors, but I think they slow the rate of production rather than cut it off. Still a risk for bone related afflictions.

And this isn't precocious puberty, that shit is when you're 5 or 7. 9 to 10 is considered normal. Precocious puberty isn't even a percentage of our population and typically is caused not by diet but the pituitary gland or hypothalamus. You're not wrong that obesity increases the likelihood of maturing faster, but I feel like then we should be upping food standards or banning those plastics that fuck with our endocrine system. Not trying to treat a symptom of the two with drugs.

Not that I mean to accuse you of supporting it, but I felt it needed to be said and I might actually get to learn more.
 
Considering 6 weeks is barely "a week late", certainly not long enough to be showing obvious signs of pregnancy, I'm once again skeptical of how this came to light in the first place if there was no acute assault and ensuing manhunt for the perpetrator. Pregnancy is not the first thought when a child that young is a few days off on her menses.
 
Back