Why is being a woman pedo OK if the pedo is hot?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Again though, we are not discussing men, rather teenaged boys and other men's perception of them in this situation. It really has nothing to do with me and what other women think, rather, why do some men think it is acceptable for teen boys to be raped by grown women?
What do you think boys and teens raised in an environment like that grow up to be? The kid's fucked, the behavior's fucked, and the teacher is a monster but feminism means males cannot be victims and God help the person that takes a stand to say otherwise. Society made them that way and for how uncomfortable it makes the ones potentially worth reaching, like you, maybe the jokes are worth making. Please think instead of seethe and I know you can sort this out.
 
Because society doesn't really give a shit about the sexual 'purity' of boys as compared to girls. You never hear a woman explain how the man needs to be a virgin until marriage, for example. In fact, the more sex a man has he is seen as desirable, because it means people want to fuck him.
Then we also have the idea that sex is harder for men to get, so if it's given to him via rape than he's lucky. This is usually thought by people who watch a shitload of porn and don't understand that reality is much different.
And if we really want to get into some Red Pill or whatever talking points, really young men are seen as the single most deposable type of human, we don't really give a shit what happens to them.
 
What do you think boys and teens raised in an environment like that grow up to be? The kid's fucked, the behavior's fucked, and the teacher is a monster but feminism means males cannot be victims and God help the person that takes a stand to say otherwise. Society made them that way and for how uncomfortable it makes the ones potentially worth reaching, like you, maybe the jokes are worth making. Please think instead of seethe and I know you can sort this out.
You need to relax. Not all women think and behave the way you think they do. Men can be victims. In this particular situation, I am disturbed by all the men that come out to simp for a pedo. That is all.
 
You need to relax. Not all women think and behave the way you think they do. Men can be victims.
The problem is that at literally every opportunity to observe this phenomenon, with myself, with friends, with family, or elsewhere, across myriad locations, women will say this. They will proclaim to think like this. But their actions betray them completely.
In this particular situation, I am disturbed by all the men that come out to simp for a pedo. That is all.
Because when the feminists in power regularly mock victims, discourage reporting, and go easy on female perpetrators for decades, it sends the message to society that it is okay. Women spent years and years zealously pushing for this, they were told shit like this was the inevitable outcome, and they continued anyway.
 
Again though, we are not discussing men, rather teenaged boys and other men's perception of them in this situation. It really has nothing to do with me and what other women think, rather, why do some men think it is acceptable for teen boys to be raped by grown women?
If an attractive woman sleeps with a teenager people assume she must have been lonely and needy and unable to control themselves. In fact that's kind of been the view going back a long ways, that women are sexually uninhibited and infantile, men are supposed to be the virtuous ones.

If a grown man does it, not only is he far more responsible for not controlling himself, but like Civilian said he's spoiling the purity of some young woman, which is very important since again, they don't have much value as responsible adults.

Now are women actually retarded? They don't have to be, but feminists have been pushing for women to be society's uwu widdle baby victims for years, and they've gotten their wish. Now everyone assumes they're irresponsible idiots and if they're hot that's basically the highest virtue they could have.

What do you think boys and teens raised in an environment like that grow up to be? The kid's fucked, the behavior's fucked, and the teacher is a monster but feminism means males cannot be victims and God help the person that takes a stand to say otherwise. Society made them that way and for how uncomfortable it makes the ones potentially worth reaching, like you, maybe the jokes are worth making. Please think instead of seethe and I know you can sort this out.
Why do you so badly want men to be recognized as victims?
I mean, there's already a way that's popular online to deal with this if you want to opt out of the responsibilities of being a man because it's too tough to not have everyone pat you on the back when your fee fees are hurt.

What happens to men and boys raised in an environment like that is they learn they are what they do and they have no right to life, which they don't, they need to take care of themselves and be responsible because nobody else is going to look out for them, and then they grow up and become sturdy and self sufficient instead of faggots who cry every time they scrape their knee.

So basically they learn the correct lessons. Good.
If women want to be treated like babies that's up to them, don't try to act like men should be getting in on the action.
 
Why do you so badly want men to be recognized as victims?
I mean, there's already a way that's popular online to deal with this if you want to opt out of the responsibilities of being a man because it's too tough to not have everyone pat you on the back when your fee fees are hurt.

What happens to men and boys raised in an environment like that is they learn they are what they do and they have no right to life, which they don't, they need to take care of themselves and be responsible because nobody else is going to look out for them, and then they grow up and become sturdy and self sufficient instead of faggots who cry every time they scrape their knee.

So basically they learn the correct lessons. Good.
If women want to be treated like babies that's up to them, don't try to act like men should be getting in on the action.
I care more about there not being dissonance between principles and actions. While I would be satisfied with women having to learn to man up when these things happen, I very much doubt women would be. There needs to be consistent standards and only one is really a viable option from here. This thread is clear evidence of problems with double standards. You have someone, either through ignorance or malice, weaponizing a predictable response to a situation largely forced on males.
 
I care more about there not being dissonance between principles and actions. While I would be satisfied with women having to learn to man up when these things happen, I very much doubt women would be. There needs to be consistent standards and only one is really a viable option from here. This thread is clear evidence of problems with double standards. You have someone, either through ignorance or malice, weaponizing a predictable response to a situation largely forced on males.
Another thread can be started about this, but to be honest, I have a very narrow focus here and it is why men simp for pedos if they are hot. I am not saying some of your other points aren't valid and worthy of discussion just they are not answering the question I am asking.
 
Going somewhere else because you do not like the explanation will not change it. Men and boys get zero support because sadistic women demanded it. This pretty much precludes most anything other than the dark jokes you harpies are screeching about. Any man already knows that jokes like that aren't meant to hurt the victim and why that's all that's said. What seems to escape explanation since time immemorial is why are women like this? Edit: for you, ghoul:
View attachment 3453405
I find it a bit amusing that the three accounts that rated the linked post MATI also rated your post MATI.
 
The question is fact and circumstance intensive.

First, if we are talking about actual pedophilia, ie relations with prepubescent boys, there is nothing "hot" about it or anything remotely acceptable. That will fuck a child up, although I do think it damages girls more than boys.

But I do not think that is what OP means by "pedo." I think he means teenage minors. First, age of consent laws in the United States are high. The only place higher than 16 is Ireland, 17. Much of Europe is 14-15. UK is 16. IIRC correctly, 11 states had an age of consent of 18, but that number has gone up, it seems. Age of consent that high makes this country similar to places like Iran.

Presuming OP is not talking about actual pedophilia but hot teachers fucking 16-17 sophmores or juniors in high school, it is important to stress that men and women are different, and the mechanism of attraction is different for men than women. Women rely a lot more on social proof, such that a young man who had relations to an attractive teacher (in a situation that could get her in lots trouble, losing her job at a minimum) is going to make him very attractive to women, probably for the rest of his life.

For me it also depends greatly on whether she was married or not. No one seems to talk about that (at all), but that's the really only problem I have with a twenty or thirty something year old woman fucking a high school kid.

Here is one absurd example--Baylee Turner was 23 when she had relations with a student who was about 17. Nothing inappropriate about that age difference. They married to prevent him from testifying and now have a child.


I do not have all the answer but I think an age of consent of 16 is absolute folly, especially in a society that is hyper pornographic and sexualized, and excuses and condones all sorts of profligacy and vice in seemingly every other context. If I made the rules I would probably relegate freshman back to junior high, and make age of conset at entry in high school.
Teachers who have relations with student or former students should be fired and lose their license, absent circumstances such as the student was a senior, and a former student so there is no conflict of interest. Criminal charges should only apply when there is a showing of some sort of coercion, quid pro quo etc.
 

Attachments

  • Ages_of_Consent_-_United_States.svg.png
    Ages_of_Consent_-_United_States.svg.png
    57.4 KB · Views: 27
Another thread can be started about this, but to be honest, I have a very narrow focus here and it is why men simp for pedos if they are hot. I am not saying some of your other points aren't valid and worthy of discussion just they are not answering the question I am asking.
No, it's an answer to your question you don't like. Men simp for the hot ones because at least at wasn't some unfuckable hambeast like many usually are. Hell a lot of guys are having to reconcile it was some predator fag that raped them. It's a "silver lining" in a situation society cannot even acknowledge because of the demands of women. I expect nothing but further deflection though, introspection seems to be something endowed with penises.
I find it a bit amusing that the three accounts that rated the linked post MATI also rated your post MATI.
It's like they think it'd do anything but encourage me.
 
Because men are dumb and think sex with hot women is the end all and be all of life. And since out of the men who think this way have never been with a hot woman, they never consider a)how crazy she may be and b) how harmful in the moment, and overtime, that experience is for a teenage boy.
 
No, it's an answer to your question you don't like. Men simp for the hot ones because at least at wasn't some unfuckable hambeast like many usually are. Hell a lot of guys are having to reconcile it was some predator fag that raped them. It's a "silver lining" in a situation society cannot even acknowledge because of the demands of women. I expect nothing but further deflection though, introspection seems to be something endowed with penises.
You are still missing the point - she is taking advantage of a minor who cannot consent. If you want to go with the whole she was hot argument, then yes, he needs to pay for whatever results from that and stfu. Otherwise, she is a pedo, needs to be jailed, child produced made a ward of the state. You can't have it both ways.
 
You are still missing the point - she is taking advantage of a minor who cannot consent. If you want to go with the whole she was hot argument, then yes, he needs to pay for whatever results from that and stfu. Otherwise, she is a pedo, needs to be jailed, child produced made a ward of the state.
I'm struggling to follow your logic here: hot or not, the minor remains a minor who cannot consent. She's always going to be a pedophile and what she did isn't in actuality okay. Are you saying that if men in general, and/or the victim finds the perpetrator physically attractive, that is somehow not only consent but then grounds to order child support? Why should that factor into whether or not what she did was okay at all?
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not the one who chose a double standard as their hill to die on. This is the environment women made that creates the men that make jokes like that.
 
I'm struggling to follow your logic here: hot or not, the minor remains a minor who cannot consent. She's always going to be a pedophile and what she did isn't in actuality okay. Are you saying that if men in general, and/or the victim finds the perpetrator physically attractive, that is somehow not only consent but then grounds to order child support? Why should that factor into whether or not what she did was okay at all?

I'm not the one who chose a double standard as their hill to die on. This is the environment women made that creates the men that make jokes like that.
That is exactly what I think you are arguing. I don't think whether she is hot or not should have any bearing on her legal culpability, but many men here seem to entertain that idea. I think she should go to prison, hot or not, end.
 
Back