The IRL N Tower: The Story Behind A Black Housing Project That Helped Kill A City


Pruitt-Igoe_building_demolition_April_1972-800x400.jpg

The city of Saint Louis, Missouri has made headlines multiple times in the past decade over Black issues, with the most famous event being the killing of Michael Brown. Race riots in Ferguson made that particular neighborhood of Saint Louis a household name overnight. Similar events took place in 2017 with the acquittal of officer Jason Stockley in the killing of superpredator Anthony Lamar Smith. 2020 also saw an explosion of protests after George Floyd suffered a heart attack in police custody. This led to the infamous confrontation between the White, gun-toting McCloskeys and BLM protestors marching through their neighborhood.

153453.jpg

Pictured: the legacy of St. Louis
In many ways, Saint Louis has been ahead of the curve on racial upheavals; Michael Brown did nothing before George Floyd, after all. So too, did Saint Louis lead the way in the early efforts to concentrate and manage the Black population that found its way into most major metropolitan areas during and after the Second World War. Unsurprisingly, the previously rural African population created slum neighborhoods in downtown Saint Louis, where the heavy industry jobs which sought their cheap labor were located.


2.png

Some of Saint Louis’ prime citizens, peacefully demonstrated their dissatisfaction with the local constabularies
The usual combination of normal people being disgusted at the slums’ conditions and those slums sitting on otherwise valuable real estate coalesced into the political flashpoint necessary to spurn the federal government into funding a massive housing development in North Saint Louis. So it was that in 1951 ground was broken on what would eventually become a byword for crime and the failure of high-rise public housing: Pruitt-Igoe.

Originally, Pruitt-Igoe was intended to be segregated. The Pruitt section of the development—named for Tuskegee airman Wendall Pruitt—was dedicated to Blacks, and the Igoe section—after former congressman William Igoe—was for Whites. However, two years after construction was completed in 1956, the Brown vs. Board Supreme Court decision banned segregation altogether. In short, Pruitt-Igoe, having been around 40% White, became almost exclusively Black.

3.jpg

One of the early propaganda films was designed to market PI as improving the lives of tenants.
But problems with the complex were not immediate in their onset. One former resident went so far as to describe her 11th-floor apartment as “a poor man’s penthouse.” Compared to the slums many residents inhabited, such praise was not surprising. The thirty-three buildings that made up the development were designed by architect Minoru Yamasaki, a well-known architect based in Detroit who would also design notable landmarks like the main terminal for Saint Louis’ Lambert airport. Described as a master of the “New Formalism” style, Yamasaki’s expertise was highly sought, and Pruitt-Igoe’s design and grand opening were received with high praise. Numerous media outlets lauded the complex as the future of public housing and portrayed its accommodations as near idyllic.

4.jpg

Yamasaki’s most famous design was also destroyed by a different minority.
In the great optimism with which Pruitt-Igoe opened, we can see a mistaken assumption: that changing a people’s living situation necessarily changes the people themselves. As will become apparent, the fate of Pruitt-Igoe would damage this assumption. Still, it stubbornly continues to persist even today, perhaps even more strongly than when the ground was broken at the corner of Cass and Jefferson Avenue.

Things began to go wrong very quickly upon Pruitt-Igoe’s White flight. Decreased desirability of the development led to higher levels of vacancy. In today’s public housing, that may not have been as much of a problem as Uncle Sam is always around with a grant or program to offset maintenance costs. However, in the bygone era of Pruitt-Igoe, the local housing authority was expected to pay for maintenance, security, and all other expenses associated with managing the massive project out of rental income. Fewer tenants meant less money available to attend to things that needed fixing.

523145123452345.jpg

A typical unit in Pruitt-Igoe when it was still habitable.
In different circumstances, with different tenants, limited resources could have been stretched. But at Pruitt-Igoe, the housing authority wasn’t only battling things like typical mechanical failure of elevators but also the damage done by tenants. Residents described children purposely destroying light bulbs and using the elevators as “latrines.” Additionally, the trash incinerators in the basement of the buildings were sometimes ignored, with trash dumped on the floor of the incinerator room and set alight. Efforts by management to combat the wanton destruction were frustrated by the ingenuity of destruction by the teens inhabiting Pruitt-Igoe.

As one former resident described the motivation to try and destroy reinforced light fixtures, “The fact that it was indestructible made you want to try to destroy things.” In such a situation, it’s not hard to imagine the limited resources of the housing authority failing to measure up to the constantly worsening task set in front of them. The problem was so bad that Yamasaki is quoted as saying, “I never thought people were that destructive.” If watching his creation be destroyed wasn’t enough, indeed living in Detroit during the 60’s as he did forcefully disabused Mr. Yamasaki of any Asiatic notions of inherent human cleanliness.

Degrading conditions led to those who could and wanted to leave doing so. Even fewer tenants meant less rental income, and thus less maintenance, creating a vicious cycle of decay. But broken and piss-smelling elevators probably wouldn’t have been enough to condemn the project; what truly did it was the unimaginable criminality. That Pruitt-Igoe was known for its lawlessness is saying something considering that Saint Louis consistently ranks as one of the most violent cities in America. Former residents describe the stairwells of some of the less inhabited buildings as dens of thieves, drug dealers, and worse.

56765756765.jpg

Pruitt-Igoe once defined the skyline of Saint Louis almost as much as the famous Arch, which drew more attention to its failure.
Initially, the authorities sought criminals in Pruitt-Igoe as they would anywhere else. However, they were soon dissuaded from doing so by the active hostility of tenants. Even former residents admit that they would throw heavy objects, and even Molotov cocktails from their windows at emergency services. Notice, I didn’t say police, as hostility was meted out just as freely to firefighters and EMS. After a few firebombs, the complex was effectively written off, with residents describing reporting break-ins and police never arriving. Despite this era of sheer black anarchy, several efforts were undertaken to revitalize Pruitt-Igoe.

Community organizers started a myriad of organizations to lobby for increased resources, effectively demanding a bailout from the federal government, as Saint Louis was experiencing revenue declines in the 1960’s. The residents of the complex faced increasing rents as the housing authority tried to keep revenue flowing in order to keep fresh light bulbs in the sockets for the resident teens to destroy. The rent increase, along with the aforementioned community organization efforts, culminated in a 9-month rent strike. When confronted with the reality that no rent payments meant the housing authority would have no funds to conduct repairs, Mr. Porter, the head of the tenant association, responded, “we feel that’s they problem.”

It is a small wonder the state of Pruitt-Igoe didn’t degrade faster, considering such forward-thinking leadership. The rent strike lasted nine months, only ending when the housing authority agreed to limit rent to ¼ of the tenant’s income. Then, in response to even less money available for repairs, whole buildings started to be closed. Usually broken by the same gangs who preyed upon lightbulbs, windows started to get boarded up. Overnight the now abandoned housing blocks were stripped of their copper piping and became havens for drug addicts.

6946784768768.jpg

The fall of the N-Tower in 1971
The start of building closures signaled the final descent towards destruction for Pruitt-Igoe. Demolitions followed soon after, with the first two buildings coming down in 1971. But the federal government is never one to admit defeat in the face of Black failure, so a few million more dollars were pumped into renovating the few remaining inhabited buildings. Demolition followed a few years later. The entire development was flattened by 1976. Architectural history Charles Jencks described the demolition as “the day Modern architecture died,” but I think he was wrong.

The failure of Pruitt-Igoe, and similar high-rise developments like Chicago’s Cabrini-Green, triggered a flurry of studies by sociologists and urban planners eager to shift the blame to managerial policy failures. As naive as their race-blind efforts may have been, their critiques are not invalid. The idea that maintenance should be funded solely by rental income was probably ill-conceived. Still, that critique ignores the obvious: maintenance costs are going to be higher when residents view the destruction of their environment as an engaging activity. Other critiques fell flatter, such as the idea that the development style was isolating, which residents often contradicted. The positive words spoken about Pruitt-Igoe emphasize the community and its accessibility, and Yamasaki’s designs emphasized communal spaces and promoted interpersonal interaction.

4734657465.jpg

In the foreground are the slums that PI (background) replaced. PI would soon mirror its predecessor residences.
Regardless of why it failed, the important thing for our managerial class was that it did. Not only did it fail, but it became a towering eye sore that could be pointed to as evidence of government mismanagement, lack of police funding, or racial differences, depending on one’s political biases. Since the demo charges brought down the last buildings, the idea of high-density, sweeping public housing developments for Black people has effectively been DOA. With the death of Pruitt-Igoe, we’ve seen the birth of a new strategy of moving diversity directly into low-density suburban areas where the good schools are.

The good people of Black Jack are located not far from Saint Louis city. Today the area is supermajority Black, making its name a bitter irony. But once upon a time, it was a new suburb where Whites, fleeing the cramped and declining downtown, sought refuge. Yet, in a trend we are all familiar with, what they were fleeing from was never far behind. The residents of Black Jack quickly incorporated their municipality, a tactic those not from Saint Louis may not understand to be a potent weapon used to prevent the encroachment of “folks from the city.” Zoning restrictions, an authority granted by the new municipalization, were quickly put into effect, with the head of Black Jack’s zoning board describing the motivation behind such actions as maintaining the “character” of the locals, “The people here are middle-income, behave like middle income. They worry about their schools, their lawns, their property.”

3452.jpg

The site of PI today is eternally the subject of conversation about redevelopment, but doomed by its location north of Saint Louis’ famous Delmar Blvd, the effective red line of the city.
Even back then, we can see that the Black population’s euphemisms were taking root. But suppose there was any doubt as to who Black Jack residents were trying to keep out. In that case, we need only look to Reverend Elmer Fielder of the local Baptist church, “They don’t want to bring in, shall we say ‘trash, trash’ people… not necessarily just poor, but they’re just…well, you won’t be able to walk in the neighborhood then.” One imagines Reverend Fiedler biting his tongue to prevent a gamer word from slipping out. But the valiant efforts were ultimately not enough to stop what was to come. When Pruitt-Igoe was demolished, its remaining residents did not simply disappear; they were relocated.

Black Jack, and neighboring community Spanish Lake were targeted to receive former residents and Blacks from Saint Louis generally. The documentary “Spanish Lake” can provide precise details on what occurred. But in that movement, we see a change in strategy. Pruitt-Igoe wasn’t rebuilt somewhere else. Instead, the government saw nice communities like Black Jack and Spanish Lake and decided, “I think we’ll just take those.” So the cycle continues: White people flee the neighborhoods that their ancestors and immediate families built. New towns were established with new restrictions, but NGO’s and governmental authorities barge in anyways.

354262.jpg

The demographics of Black Jack today.
On and on it goes, but what became of the former site of Pruitt-Igoe and the land it used to inhabit? The lot sits empty and surrounded by ghetto only marginally better than P.I. itself. It has ascended to the ranks of the king of overgrown bare patches in a city full of them. Plans have been floated over the years to redevelop the site into everything from a hotel to a golf course, and even more housing. However, each plan has fallen through—abandoned dreams in a city that might once have been something.
 
The same starry-eyed visionary stare that looks into the future, and ignores the fundamentals of trashy human behavior and unconsidered logistical issues that will prevent what they hope will happen is repeated time and time again through our history with civic tinkering schemes, both social and engineering.

I don't think those who designed the projects had a single malicious thought as they built the first ones.

But, it certainly turned malicious when they failed ingloriously within a few years and the same people fought their demolition and eagerly wanted to just move down the road a few blocks and try it again.... having learned nothing except how to make "that wasn't real social housing" excuses.

And that continues on to this day with not only hopelessly utopic things like free houses for homeless people, free drugs for addicts, free everything-under-the-sun..... and surprised Pikachu faces all around when it doesn't help and only makes things worse.

The tragedy of "The Projects" is not that they were tried, but that their failure was excused and ignored going forward.

70 years later, I wonder, when will we, as a society, admit that you just can't motivate people to be productive if you give them the trappings of productivity, however meager, at no cost to them?
 
The same starry-eyed visionary stare that looks into the future, and ignores the fundamentals of trashy human behavior and unconsidered logistical issues that will prevent what they hope will happen is repeated time and time again through our history with civic tinkering schemes, both social and engineering.

I don't think those who designed the projects had a single malicious thought as they built the first ones.

But, it certainly turned malicious when they failed ingloriously within a few years and the same people fought their demolition and eagerly wanted to just move down the road a few blocks and try it again.... having learned nothing except how to make "that wasn't real social housing" excuses.

And that continues on to this day with not only hopelessly utopic things like free houses for homeless people, free drugs for addicts, free everything-under-the-sun..... and surprised Pikachu faces all around when it doesn't help and only makes things worse.

The tragedy of "The Projects" is not that they were tried, but that their failure was excused and ignored going forward.

70 years later, I wonder, when will we, as a society, admit that you just can't motivate people to be productive if you give them the trappings of productivity, however meager, at no cost to them?
I'm not excusing their behavior of those projects populations. Remember that St. Louis had issues with poor people WITH a recession blooming for years BEFORE this project.
 
I'm not excusing it either, I'm just wondering why people think it will ever change.

Because they're proposing mega-homeless-pods for California with "all the modern conveniences" like WiFi and communal flatscreen TVs and automated garbage pickup.... which, if built, will end up vandalized or sold for scrap to get drug money.... just like the lightbulbs and incinerators were in P-I.

And the same excuses will be floated when they are finally closed and demolished to stop rampant crime and druggies passing out dead on the stairs, to the kicking and screaming of the Newsoms and Boudins..... "That wasn't REAL social housing"

You want to build something that'll help make the slums less slummy? Try a factory before a 20-story homeless pod.
 
I'm not excusing their behavior of those projects populations. Remember that St. Louis had issues with poor people WITH a recession blooming for years BEFORE this project.
Hmmmm, wonder why the poor white people similarly affected didn’t create dystopic hellholes of violence?

Purely economic circumstances I’m sure.
 
Hmmmm, wonder why the poor white people similarly affected didn’t create dystopic hellholes of violence?

Purely economic circumstances I’m sure.
There existed White slums. However, you never heard much about them outside of Irish and Italian mobs in the 30s-40s. I know Chicago was chock full of them, but this is about St. Louis.
 
Hmmmm, wonder why the poor white people similarly affected didn’t create dystopic hellholes of violence?

Purely economic circumstances I’m sure.
I cannot find a direct answer to this, but I will make an educated guess:

Googling "poor Whites" gave me this article. That talks about the South, so that won't work here. But, a couple things stood out to me: poor White people suffered more from richer White people and Northerners.

Housing segregation was taboo during that time. Even to the point of stable Black communities being paved over. Remember that the Great Migration occurred around when living in the South in the early 20th century for job opportunity.

White flight played in with the decline of the automobile industry, which in turn saw a decrease in city funds. Urbanization became unattractive to raise a family, so in came the suburban sprawl.

That's probably not the answer you're looking for, but it's the best I can find.
 
I was raised to know the value of Fair & Balanced (TM) views and therefore I will share this excerpt from a Russian businessman's blog describing his tour of Johannesburg. Even with a boulder sized grain of salt it is a telling read.

I've been to Johannesburg. It's a bit of a shithole, but that story is completely made up to the point of hilarity. No electricity in the whole city? Swarming an office building and butchering animals while the people were still in there (where did the animals come from, why carry live animals there just to butcher them?) Only retards believe this.

(Once again) According to Mikhail, a new, albeit informal service appeared in Johannesburg. Bunches of tough guys go around offering to take the buildings back from ghouls. It happens like this: in the middle of the night several trucks drive up to the building, and hundred or two of armed thugs goes inside. Quickly, they grab the sleeping ghouls and simply start throwing them out of the building, trying not to wake the whole horde up. Before the horde completely comes to its senses and starts expressing its displeasure, the thugs weld shut all doors and windows on the first floor and put up an electrified fence. After the building is cleaned and refurbished, it turns back into an office.
And then all of white South Africa stood up and clapped.

Edit: here is a recent video of someone driving around Johannesburg for 30 minutes, feel free to skip through it and note the electricity, basic functioning society, and lack of zombie apocalypse dreamed up by some guy after a vodka bender. Stop believing shit you read on Livejournal.

 
Last edited:
I've been to Johannesburg. It's a bit of a shithole, but that story is completely made up to the point of hilarity. No electricity in the whole city? Swarming an office building and butchering animals while the people were still in there (where did the animals come from, why carry live animals there just to butcher them?) Only retards believe this.


And then all of white South Africa stood up and clapped.

Edit: here is a recent video of someone driving around Johannesburg for 30 minutes, feel free to skip through it and note the electricity, basic functioning society, and lack of zombie apocalypse dreamed up by some guy after a vodka bender. Stop believing shit you read on Livejournal.

Is that a core downtown "safe" area? Agreed it does look like bad. I wouldn't want to be in any part of that at night.
 
Not to defend this, however...

If you look at testimonials from displaced residents in leftist publications, there were big advantages for the residents. They had friends in the building, so if they needed to go somewhere, there was someone with similar-aged children there who could babysit. There were usually social workers and other services on site. These places were usually near the bus stop. You could give a friend a couple bucks and ask her to pick you up something at the store. There was real community there.

The main problem by my reckoning seems to be teenage males with no dads, uncles, grandpas, or other male authority around.

A genuinely all-female building might have worked.
 
I've been to Johannesburg. It's a bit of a shithole, but that story is completely made up to the point of hilarity. No electricity in the whole city? Swarming an office building and butchering animals while the people were still in there (where did the animals come from, why carry live animals there just to butcher them?) Only retards believe this.


And then all of white South Africa stood up and clapped.

Edit: here is a recent video of someone driving around Johannesburg for 30 minutes, feel free to skip through it and note the electricity, basic functioning society, and lack of zombie apocalypse dreamed up by some guy after a vodka bender. Stop believing shit you read on Livejournal.

Jo-burg was safe enough to film Dredd, Chappie, and a bunch of Die Antwoord film clips, so it can’t be all that bad.
St Louis, Baltimore, San Juan and Detroit all have higher murder rates.
 
Jo-burg was safe enough to film Dredd, Chappie, and a bunch of Die Antwoord film clips, so it can’t be all that bad.
St Louis, Baltimore, San Juan and Detroit all have higher murder rates.
Did I answer your earlier question?
 
Not to defend this, however...

If you look at testimonials from displaced residents in leftist publications, there were big advantages for the residents. They had friends in the building, so if they needed to go somewhere, there was someone with similar-aged children there who could babysit. There were usually social workers and other services on site. These places were usually near the bus stop. You could give a friend a couple bucks and ask her to pick you up something at the store. There was real community there.

The main problem by my reckoning seems to be teenage males with no dads, uncles, grandpas, or other male authority around.

A genuinely all-female building might have worked.
Or just dont' discriminate against men and let families stay together. A broke nuclear family is still less likely to cause problems than a broke single parent family, and if enough fathers were around, the young men probably wouldn't have gotten so bold.
 
Did I answer your earlier question?
Not really, but I was being facetious anyway, don’t worry about it.
It's simple, you just need to get yourself in the head space of a total asshole.
If ethno-nationalism is wrong I don’t want to be right.

Or just dont' discriminate against men and let families stay together. A broke nuclear family is still less likely to cause problems than a broke single parent family, and if enough fathers were around, the young men probably wouldn't have gotten so bold.
I‘d say the ‘no unemployed men’ was a misguided attempt at staving off domestic violence, alcohol abuse etc.
Another dumb idea from the social engineers.
 
Last edited:
Back