Why is being a woman pedo OK if the pedo is hot?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Kvervandi said:
That is exactly what I think you are arguing. I don't think whether she is hot or not should have any bearing on her legal culpability, but many men here seem to entertain that idea. I think she should go to prison, hot or not, end.
Click to expand...
Okay I think this is making a mountain out of a molehill from hair-splitting. I agree with prison, hot or not. I'm just saying if I was a CO at her jail, getting a cell phone would be no problem. If I were a kid who got manipulated into a situation like that, it frankly could be a lot worse. Not saying it's a good thing but it's easy to conceive of many ways it'd be even worse. An example of the logic:
1656904553775.png1656904593446.png
A violent maniac is going to ram one of the above inside of you. There is no situation where it doesn't happen. Are you going to choose the literal cactus or the silicone dilator? You do not have to say either is good in order to recognize one is definitely better.
 
Kvervandi said:
View attachment 3454182
This is the one in question and she is 46 and allegedly fucked a 14 year old stableboy.
Click to expand...
14 is post pubescent. Not at all the same thing as pedophilia, which pertains to sexual activity or attraction to prepubescent children.
Not to say I approve of a 46 year old woman but it is pure folly to suggest this is the same as child molestation.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Islamic Content
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Captain Manning, Almighty MoeBro Nation, Magnum Magazine and 9 others
It's not, these women still get arrested like the rest of the pedophiles. If i had to guess, it's same reason people don't believe in male rape, in that it's impossible to rape a man because they want it, they're not as selective as women in who they fuck, etc, etc.
 
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, eDove and secret watcher
Norbert the Tiger said:
14 is post pubescent. Not at all the same thing as pedophilia, which pertains to sexual activity or attraction to prepubescent children.
Not to say I approve of a 46 year old woman but it is pure folly to suggest this is the same as child molestation.
Click to expand...
In Australia sex with a minor, anyone one under 14, is statutory rape. It quite literally is child molestation.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Norbert the Tiger
Norbert the Tiger said:
14 is 14, not under 14. Under 14 would.be 13 on down to zero.
All children are minors, but not all minors are children.
Click to expand...
Sorry. I got the age wrong. It's 16.

"The Age of Consent in Australia is 16 years old. The age of consent is the minimum age at which an individual is considered legally old enough to consent to participation in sexual activity. Individuals aged 15 or younger in Australia are not legally able to consent to sexual activity, and such activity may result in prosecution for statutory rape or the equivalent local law.

Australia statutory rape law is violated each of Australia's territories has local laws specifying an age of consent, which ranges from a low of 16 years old to a high of 17 years old. Several territories also have close-in-age exemptions."

And this might be the fastest speed run for a new poster to volunteer for the wall. Very weird pedo apology here.
 
Well, I think it's degenerate as fuck...

But as for why a distressing amount of guys seem to treat it like it's not that big a deal I think it comes down to two main factors.

1. Men can't get pregnant and because of that there's a societal viewpoint that when men get raped/molested or whatever that it's not as a big a deal as when a woman does. It's bullshit but what societal viewpoint ISN'T bullshit in clown world.

2. (And I think this is by far the bigger reason) Lots of guys these days are absolutely STARVED for female attention on any level and this leads to a disturbing kind of projection where the thought process is 'well at least HE'S getting some' or 'man I wish I was that kid.' It's honestly fairly disturbing and in my view this issue is only going to get worse as man/woman relations in the coming age continue their path of monetization leading them to further break down and disintegrate.
 
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, NoonmanR, Figger Naggot and 2 others
Getting tard comed said:
Sorry. I got the age wrong. It's 16.

"The Age of Consent in Australia is 16 years old. The age of consent is the minimum age at which an individual is considered legally old enough to consent to participation in sexual activity. Individuals aged 15 or younger in Australia are not legally able to consent to sexual activity, and such activity may result in prosecution for statutory rape or the equivalent local law.

Australia statutory rape law is violated each of Australia's territories has local laws specifying an age of consent, which ranges from a low of 16 years old to a high of 17 years old. Several territories also have close-in-age exemptions."

And this might be the fastest speed run for a new poster to volunteer for the wall. Very weird pedo apology here.
Click to expand...
First, read my initial post. An age of consent of 16 is acceptable to me. 14-16 is sort of a gray area. 14 is really on the line and probably too young. But in Germany and other.European countries the age of consent is 14 for some sensible reasons.

As a policy consideration, I object to age of consent higher than 16, and I do think it is madness when people clutch their pearls about some 16 to a day under 18 willingly having sexual relations with a woman who is older, absent a showing of coercion or really egregious age difference (mid 40s and higher.


Even so you—and others—seem to conflate statutory rape with child molestation. These are simply not the same things. In the states, child molestation is strict liability re Mens Rea (mistake of age not a defense) whereas in some but not all jurisdictions if some 15 yo who looks 18 or age of consent says she is that age and the accused believes her, it can be a defense. Child molestation also carries much stiffer penalties, and that rightly so because it is a fundamentally different and far more egregious crime.

You and others call me a pedo, which is offensive and unfair to me as you people seem to not understand or care that the word pertains to sexual activity or attraction to prepubescent children, which I have not defended or excused in the slightest.

Did you check out that story re former teacher Baylee Turner? She was 23 he was 17. She lost her teaching job and license, prosecutor was coming after he until they married and spousal privilege put an end to that. Criminalizing relations between a 17 and 20 something, absent showing of lack of consent is puritanical lunacy at its worst.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
  • Lunacy
Reactions: |o|, Steely Dan, Almighty MoeBro Nation and 5 others
CivilianOfTheFandomWars said:
Because society doesn't really give a shit about the sexual 'purity' of boys as compared to girls. You never hear a woman explain how the man needs to be a virgin until marriage, for example. In fact, the more sex a man has he is seen as desirable, because it means people want to fuck him.
Then we also have the idea that sex is harder for men to get, so if it's given to him via rape than he's lucky. This is usually thought by people who watch a shitload of porn and don't understand that reality is much different.
And if we really want to get into some Red Pill or whatever talking points, really young men are seen as the single most deposable type of human, we don't really give a shit what happens to them.
Click to expand...
No one mentioned it, so I decided to add that in most of these cases, protection is not used, and what do you think follows this? In the case of an adult pedophile raping a 12-year-old girl, she and her parents are fucked, literally and figuratively. What will 12-year-old Susie do? Have an abortion or give birth?! Great fucking choice. The consequences are largely on par with or even worse than rape for girls.

For boys, of course, the event itself is traumatic and terrifying, but these are really different weight categories of shit that you have to work with.
 
Its not, however when you imagine a kiddydiddler you would typically imagine...
an ugly, decrepit old dude. usually. its a prejudice we still have yet to break, but no. A pedo is a pedo and downright unforgivable, no matter your flesh vessel's appearance.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tomboy Respecter
Kvervandi said:
But why is this? I think you men are to blame more than women because you all just let it go if she is hot, which to me as a woman is not acceptable, but to some men, it clearly is. Well as long as there are no consequences, anyway. Then it is back to rape.
Click to expand...

You know how when women see that video of sad-looking puppies and The Eyes of An Angel playing, they become total retards and are temporarily rendered incapable of rational thought? Pretty eyes and a nice rack do something similar to the male brain. The more recently puberty was, the dumber you become around tits.

Anyway, back to raping!
 
It's cause of the difference of men and women especially during puberty, this time of your affects boys differently then women. The "Think with your dick" mentality starts at this age, you start to look at the women around you as potential partners teachers included cause you're looking to get off. Then your teacher starts coming onto you and the majority of men would go along with it (depending on how hot the teacher is), understanding that it is an abusive of trust and power but you've got a gril coming onto you and showing interest in you when others haven't so why not.

It's bad that it happens but a 14 year old penetrating his teacher is better than a 14 year old being penetrated by his teacher
 
Norbert the Tiger said:
Did you check out that story re former teacher Baylee Turner? She was 23 he was 17. She lost her teaching job and license, prosecutor was coming after he until they married and spousal privilege put an end to that. Criminalizing relations between a 17 and 20 something, absent showing of lack of consent is puritanical lunacy at its worst.
Click to expand...
I don't think you understand the case. Being a teacher is a position of power, and she took advantage of it. She would get in trouble even if he was 18.
 
Vingle said:
I don't think you understand the case. Being a teacher is a position of power, and she took advantage of it. She would get in trouble even if he was 18.
Click to expand...
I do understand. And depending on the circumstances she should lose her job. But I doubt that here. She should not go to jail absent coercion or the like.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back