Which would require ships to travel all the way from the baltic sea, require consent from the allies which they would never get, and which would turn into a bloodbath. On the Kuril islands the two sides were equal in losses, and the japanese garrison was larger than the Soviet forces landed. Soviets were only able to take the islands as the garrison surrendered with the surrender of the mainland
Well, since their butt-jumping, diaper wearing leader was executed not too long ago, I don't think they're goin to do much
Either its a CHinese asset being activated or a WEF goon.
Ironically Abe had no children
The fact they are even still allowed to exist after what they did is worrying
If I remember correctly, the reason he had no children is because either he or his wife had fertility issues.
China actually benefits from this because Abe was a pro-US war hawk edgelord, but there is no fucking way it was anything related to WEF/CIA/Mosad/whatever. His foreign policies are all about maintaining/supporting the petrodollar and his stance has never ever changed, globalists have no reason to remove their loyal puppet.
he was supposed to end japan's declining growth, not add to it
and the japanese citizens will take that ass fucking and thank the government for it.
Too on the nose. If I was going to try and spark WW3, I'd have evidence "hidden" in my home / apartment to be found later on, maybe a social media account following Chinese / Korean press and activists to let the Japanese press to find to make it impossible to cover up by CCP mules / peaceniks. Something like a printout tore up in my trash bin, in Chinese, saying "Abe, Nara, [time of speech]."
That's one viewpoint. Here's another. What's the per capital Nigger population in those other countries compared to the US? I bet that chart looks almost exactly the same.
Why the hell would you try starting WW3 by shooting a PM to a country who has no standing army in the first place?
