Debate user @mondofilming on the ethics of masturbating to animal abuse

  • 🐕 Changes are being made. Got a request? Shoot your shot.
    💹 I am interested in growing the non-English section of the site. Discuss.
    🖼️ Old attachments may be broken. I am rebuilding the local filesystem. They are not lost.
Guy not only tries to grandstand and say the farms is 'on his level' for making fun of retards like him, but he essentially admits to masturbating to actual footage of animal abuse likely including zoosadist animal torture, in any way he is admitting to acts that I believe are considered illegal in the US federally now. He also strangely reiterates multiple times he 'isn't big into baby stuff' so, he admits he gets off to that too. He posted this as one of his first two posts.
mondofilming said:
Hurtcore
Click to expand...
In a thread titled 'I found a drawer full of fetises what should I do with them' not sure if this response to that can even be considered a joke seeing what this guy just spat out onto that thread.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: The Great Nig in the Sky, HumptiDouji, Begemot and 9 others
I want off this planet. What in the actual fuck did I just read?

1657258188510.png
1657258317657.png
1657258399056.png
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon, From The Uncanny Valley, Toolbox and 1 other person
They're definitely from Reddit. That whole piece-by-piece responding to sentences instead of quoting a whole message and formulating a proper response is a very Redditor thing to do. They are unable to compose proper paragraphs and maintain a flowing thought process when communicating, so quoting piece by piece allows their solely frontal cortex-fueled thought to not feel inhibited.

Notice that for sections there are no quotes, they make a new paragraph line each time. It is possible this structure is their only self-defense mechanism to maintain their confidence in this situation in self-aware recognition of their deviant, degenerate fetish.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: HumptiDouji, Helvetia, Cherry Eyed Hamster and 7 others
Unfortunately assuming they show up giving them a thread and a pissed off audience is just going to reward them I'm afraid, for individuals like this getting a reaction out of people online is more power and attention than they'd have at any other point in their life.

Crystal Coomer said:
They're definitely from Reddit. That whole piece-by-piece responding to sentences instead of quoting a whole message and formulating a proper response is a very Redditor thing to do. They are unable to compose proper paragraphs and maintain a flowing thought process when communicating, so quoting piece by piece allows their solely frontal cortex-fueled thought to not feel inhibited.

Notice that for sections there are no quotes, they make a new paragraph line each time. It is possible this structure is their only self-defense mechanism to maintain their confidence in this situation in self-aware recognition of their deviant, degenerate fetish.
Click to expand...
Indeed, the other way you can tell that they use Reddit is that they masturbate to really disgusting things.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: From The Uncanny Valley and My Name is Mud
Toolbox said:
he essentially admits to masturbating to actual footage of animal abuse likely including zoosadist animal torture, in any way he is admitting to acts that I believe are considered illegal in the US federally now
Click to expand...
No law background so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't think it is. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/724/text

My understanding is this is the only federal regulation in the states regarding videos of animal abuse. Creation and distribution are illegal, but viewing and possession notably are not. So theoretically our resident tard could have hard drives of the shit and it be completely lawful so long as he doesn't share it. Pending any local laws of course.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Toolbox and Norbert the Tiger
More than the zoosadistic crap, i got disgusted with this fuck using a literal minor age character from MHA to prove a point as reaction.
No.
 
Kermit Jizz said:
No law background so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't think it is. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/724/text

My understanding is this is the only federal regulation in the states regarding videos of animal abuse. Creation and distribution are illegal, but viewing and possession notably are not. So theoretically our resident tard could have hard drives of the shit and it be completely lawful so long as he doesn't share it. Pending any local laws of course.
Click to expand...
Judging by the progression of laws against these sickos, I would bet it won't be legal for much longer. Keep in mind CP was in a legal grey area for horribly long up until the 70s. But considering this guy's obsession, I don't think he is far away from committing the acts he fantasizes about and he probably does share material he downloads if he is active on chan boards for this stuff as Yonder pointed out. But sadly unless he can be doxed properly, he will get away with this for too long. Especially if he is actually in MX. None of the progression of the US's law would apply.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom