Furry Fandom and Drama General

I do volunteer work at my church and there was a funeral mass for a furry here and a lot of furries showed up. It was very strange.
Revere, MA? (If it was Kohi mentioned above)
1657339622601.png

This tweet lines up
1657339796455.png
 
They argue that some women have impossibly big boobs in real life View attachment 3462952
When one point out the male fursuit doesn't have a bulge, they say boobs doesn't equal genitals and thus it's a false equivalency and proof that you are indeed sexualizing breast.
That’s a pretty terrible argument. “Oh well this one lady, approximately 0.000000012% of the known living population, and approximately 0.00000000092% of humans who have ever lived is representative of a natural human genetic phenotype!” Fucking brain worm. It’s like the people who argue gender dysphoria isn’t just mental and that there are more than 2 sexes because 0.0001% of the population has a chromosomal disease resulting in hermaphroditism or any other strange genital/genetic mutation.
 
That’s a pretty terrible argument. “Oh well this one lady, approximately 0.000000012% of the known living population, and approximately 0.00000000092% of humans who have ever lived is representative of a natural human genetic phenotype!” Fucking brain worm. It’s like the people who argue gender dysphoria isn’t just mental and that there are more than 2 sexes because 0.0001% of the population has a chromosomal disease resulting in hermaphroditism or any other strange genital/genetic mutation.
Also, those women don't have the same build as that fursuit.
 
Thank fuck Lou never acted on his crotch-tit saga back when he had that pony character for all of a week.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: anliteralidiot
Not really a big thing in and of itself, but it might generate some drama on Twitter:


Flayrah wrote an article about why cancelling people for feral art is a problem. My favorite part is how it says that cancelling furries for making feral porn is hypocritical because furries like two legged furries for the same reason, they have animal parts. Therefore if four legged porn is wrong then so is two legged porn. Of course the main draw from this is that both of them are zoophilia and both sides want to fuck animals in some capacity.

Screenshot_20220709-233517.pngScreenshot_20220709-233528.pngScreenshot_20220709-233541.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
They really went to commit a terrorist attack with a flare gun and a cowboy 1800's revolver :story:
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
Not really a big thing in and of itself, but it might generate some drama on Twitter:


Flayrah wrote an article about why cancelling people for feral art is a problem. My favorite part is how it says that cancelling furries for making feral porn is hypocritical because furries like two legged furries for the same reason, they have animal parts. Therefore if four legged porn is wrong then so is two legged porn. Of course the main draw from this is that both of them are zoophilia and both sides want to fuck animals in some capacity.

View attachment 3476325View attachment 3476326View attachment 3476328
And today I am reminded that Flayrah is just an older version of DogPatchPress, complete with dumb hot takes and doubling down on idiocy.
 
And today I am reminded that Flayrah is just an older version of DogPatchPress, complete with dumb hot takes and doubling down on idiocy.
Aren't all those "furry news" blogs the same, just with a different avatar anyway?
 
And today I am reminded that Flayrah is just an older version of DogPatchPress, complete with dumb hot takes and doubling down on idiocy.
If you don't know one reports zoosadists and put pedos in jail but the other is owned by PedoBunny. That's like mild diarrhea vs anal cancer.

Wow… yep, except they came to the church for the Mass which was very unusual. The sexton was very confused as I guess it was for a dude who role plays a female character
Someone told them there would be a Sexton and they thought it meant something horny and obese?
 
Last edited:
If you don't know one reports zoosadists and put pedos in jail but the other is owned by PedoBunny. That's like mild diarrhea vs anal cancer.
shout-out to the time I told DogPatchPress about Sangie abusing me as a kid, and DPP didn't believe me or do anything because Sangie hit all the SJW talking points regularly & was sponsoring Boozy.

It wasn't until a year later with the zoosadist leaks and Sangie's connection to Nelizar coming out that either believed me or acted on it- once the scenario had grown too big for them to cover their asses
 
If you don't know one reports zoosadists and put pedos in jail but the other is owned by PedoBunny. That's like mild diarrhea vs anal cancer.
shout-out to the time I told DogPatchPress about Sangie abusing me as a kid, and DPP didn't believe me or do anything because Sangie hit all the SJW talking points regularly & was sponsoring Boozy.

It wasn't until a year later with the zoosadist leaks and Sangie's connection to Nelizar coming out that either believed me or acted on it- once the scenario had grown too big for them to cover their asses
Furries are most fascinating in when their politics start to grind against each other. Most furry politics are just new flavours of the same three things: virtue signaling, trying to be in charge of some website/con/other degenerate group, and "protecting the fandoms image".

DPP is a great example of this. So long as some virtue signals correctly they are signal boosted and held up so as to make the fandom as a whole look good, and rather than put out information that could make a furry that's currently on the "in" group look bad, as they tend to treat every furry as an icon and representative of the fandom as a whole rather than individuals, they will bury anything they can if it doesn't make the fandom look good, and if they can't bury it they will bury anything they can that connects that now unwanted individual to the fandom.

Furry politics is purely about perception of those they hold up, not their words, actions, or deeds.
 
shout-out to the time I told DogPatchPress about Sangie abusing me as a kid, and DPP didn't believe me or do anything because Sangie hit all the SJW talking points regularly & was sponsoring Boozy.

It wasn't until a year later with the zoosadist leaks and Sangie's connection to Nelizar coming out that either believed me or acted on it- once the scenario had grown too big for them to cover their asses
Translation: Shout out to the time a half-ass, dime a dozen callout was spammed at a much larger account to boost off it like a stepping stone, but it lacked proper presentation to do anything about it.

It's the plague of extremely-online furries. They expect their enemies to be slain as if by magic.

I know that was part of DPP's entire year of research for a 5 part report about the zoosadists which took a year because of doing background interviews and cross referencing hundreds of pages of evidence. The logs breakdown made it possible for others to do work like this thread. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/besti...odywork-denver-archimedes-banya-denver.97488/ It must feel bad that callouts don't work like magic but people who do the work understand.

The Taofox evidence was unusable to build a legal case, possibly from how it was obtained, and internet investigation doesn't have legal power to access evidence that the cops can. Even so, persistent work can accomplish things, but it must be lined up just right and many times can't be. If the cops didn't do it, don't expect someone else to do it. I'll take my credit now for the thread leading to the dissolving of a million dollar business of a zoo ring leader. Please, for the love of jesus, stop expecting magic callouts.
 
Last edited:
Translation: Shout out to the time a half-ass, dime a dozen callout was spammed at a much larger account to boost off it like a stepping stone, but it lacked proper presentation to do anything about it.
I PM'd him directly to share my story, I don't do callout posts.

But if you're gonna make assumptions like that, please take a play from our book & 41% yourself sweetheart :feels:
 
Gonna double post as I'm #Triggered & MITA, you win:

If someone paints theirself as an arbiter of communal justice, but doesn't want to hear any further when somebody comes forward to privately to disclose how they were abused as a child, solely because their pre-conception of the pedophile is that they're 'on the right side' from parroting talking points you agree with, they deserve neither influence nor respect. Especially when that person's prior convictions were already in the purview of both Boozy & DPP.

I had logs & evidence of all of this I could've easily shared but I was met with immediate dismissal from DPP assuming it was some alt-right ops and Boozy assuming I was trying to help a competitor to InkedFur (presumably paw2press?) who'd approached him to take IFs spot when somebody else had put a callout on Sangie prior to the zoosadist expose.

Assuming a victim of child grooming was making a callout post as a form of clout chasing as in the post above, when in reality I chose to approach it privately to not put either individual in an odd position publicly & out of fear of repercussions for me as I was still a dependent, is gross. I later did contribute logs / evidence to getting Nelizar incarcerated and had to deal with the shit he told me as a kid like when he said he wanted to carve me up with a knife all with a smiling ':3' to punctuate it. GFYS!
 
Back