Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,450 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 285 11.0%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,599
You'd know more about this than I would... but if it turned out that Skordas had bitten off more than he could chew for the agreed amount, could he have gone back to Null and renegotiated his fee? If this option was open and Skordas didn't pursue it, that suggests that Skordas has Messrs Grimm and Keenan's measure.
Skordas could certainly have asked for a bonus, but Null is not forced to agree to it. Their previous agreement is binding.
 
unfortunately for us, i think his days of the full-blown fb ranting are over. he generally only posts the most banal shit now to avoid it getting reposted here and “taken out of context.”
I remain hopeful. After all, he did give us that Instagram post where he figuratively described a judge who ruled against him as "snorting meth" less than a year ago.

View attachment 2672954
View attachment 2672953
Just keep talking shit about that judge...
 
I remain hopeful. After all, he did give us that Instagram post where he figuratively described a judge who ruled against him as "snorting meth" less than a year ago.
those posts were pretty gd hilarious, but of course i am not convinced he spoke to an actual lawyer. if he did, it’s the shitheel(s) he got to represent him on appeal
 
  • Like
Reactions: Windex
those posts were pretty gd hilarious, but of course i am not convinced he spoke to an actual lawyer. if he did, it’s the shitheel(s) he got to represent him on appeal.
I doubt he spoke a lawyer. If he did, he was very vague because any lawyer that's not one of Russ's lawyers would tell him he had no case if they knew all the facts.

Wonder once the appeal is kicked if Russ tries to sue his lawyers for malpractice. Since they were working pro bono, Russ isn't out any money, so I'm not sure what he could sue for. One of the legal experts in the thread could tell us more.
 
Wonder once the appeal is kicked if Russ tries to sue his lawyers for malpractice. Since they were working pro bono, Russ isn't out any money, so I'm not sure what he could sue for. One of the legal experts in the thread could tell us more.
I'm guessing that Russhole would be more likely to put in complaints to the relevant authorities to have Grimm and Keenan disbarred than he would try and sue them.
 
Wonder once the appeal is kicked if Russ tries to sue his lawyers for malpractice. Since they were working pro bono, Russ isn't out any money, so I'm not sure what he could sue for. One of the legal experts in the thread could tell us more.
Generally, a malpractice suit requires not only objectively negligent conduct by the lawyer, but actual damage to the client. I think it could be argued that even if they have objectively incompetently handled this case, it never had any merit in the first place, so no harm, no foul. Of course then they have to argue they deliberately took a completely meritless case.

It generally takes the opinion of another lawyer to establish malpractice, although I'm not sure if this is the case for more obvious cases of malpractice, like simply outright failing to file a notice of appeal on time. A bar complaint might go further. Even pro bono counsel has to work to some objective level of competence.
 
Generally, a malpractice suit requires not only objectively negligent conduct by the lawyer, but actual damage to the client. I think it could be argued that even if they have objectively incompetently handled this case, it never had any merit in the first place, so no harm, no foul. Of course then they have to argue they deliberately took a completely meritless case.

It generally takes the opinion of another lawyer to establish malpractice, although I'm not sure if this is the case for more obvious cases of malpractice, like simply outright failing to file a notice of appeal on time. A bar complaint might go further. Even pro bono counsel has to work to some objective level of competence.

russ wouldn’t know legal competence if it sucked him his penis, sooo…
 
No because what they are doing now makes them pretty much unhireable.
Just getting into bed with Russhole makes them unhireable to most of the industry they are trying to work their way into. This is the guy that sues celebrities and muscicians because they wont suck him his peepee. The companies that they want for clients are the ones that do business with Taylor Swift, Arianna Grande and the America's Got Talent producers. Word gets around.
 
I might be wrong, but I'm guessing these are the kinda issues Russ would get away with by being pro se. For example, I remember him transcending human intellect with his page numbers too (6).

My main hope is that this inspires him to keep suing people because he'll be convinced all lawyers are dumb and he's best. Maybe that's the true aim of the brothers Grimm law firm, and they're heroes and farmers after all.
 
I might be wrong, but I'm guessing these are the kinda issues Russ would get away with by being pro se.
Russ, for all his faults, never got this bad. The courts aren't required to conduct your case for you, and even pro se litigants have to respect deadlines.

Edit:
Screenshot_20220712-105538_Facebook.jpg
Screenshot_20220712-105548_Facebook.jpg
Edit:
FB_IMG_1657627123888.jpg
FB_IMG_1657627129786.jpg
FB_IMG_1657627126758.jpg
FB_IMG_1657627132197.jpg
 
Last edited:
Russ, for all his faults, never got this bad. The courts aren't required to conduct your case for you, and even pro se litigants have to respect deadlines.

Edit:
View attachment 3483475
View attachment 3483474

No Vegas local would pick such touristy locations to highlight their hometown pride. Just goes to show how Russhole is very much a naive newcomer and misfit outsider. He's still a wide-eyed small fry foolishly taken in by the bullshit image Vegas tries to sell to out of town rubes.
 
No Vegas local would pick such touristy locations to highlight their hometown pride. Just goes to show how Russhole is very much a naive newcomer and misfit outsider. He's still a wide-eyed small fry foolishly taken in by the bullshit image Vegas tries to sell to out of town rubes.
He could live there for 10 years and still be a tourist.
 
His tourist pics drive my RuSs DoEsN't DrIvE Autism... He's right about where the bus drops you off from his part of town if your a dummy (Spring Mountain Road to Fashion Show Mall would be faster easier and more direct but Google doesn't quite realize it's The Strip). All of his pictures are within half a block of each other. He got of the bus around Flaming/Koval half walked the back way to the high roller down linq lane, took a picture of the dive bar across from Bally's flamingo road entrance, walked to the flamingo. He literally passed the makeshift memorial where Tupac got shot and these are the boring pics we get. He could of spent $2 on monorail tickets and/or figured out the free trams on the west side of the strip and seen so much more. I get the feel he wandered around in the heat saw women and was done. Last time I was on the strip was to bike all over it during the shutdown (going through the tiled parts of Park MGM was my favorite).

Most locals avoid the strip unless they have a full on good reason to go (something involving friends, sports, entertainment ect). I could see a local bussing it to avoid paying to park. I can't think of anything truly noteworthy in the tourist corridor post pandemic now that casinos are full on sheer the sheep at all costs more.

There are interesting things for tourists and locals outside the strip downtown but I expect Russ to never do that stuff. One of the most lauded and major attractions is fairly close to his hovel.
 
Russ' lawyers filed another fixed version, and it was full of flaws again. How are they this bad? This is the third time

View attachment 3480710

Flaws:
View attachment 3480688

They have three days to fix it (again)
Ok... now I'm genuinely confused. The notice says that pagination of volume two does not begin with the cover page. But volume 1 & 2 are paginated exactly the same way: the cover page doesn't bear a page number, but is page 1, and the numbering begins with page 2 on the page following the cover page ("1 App. 2" or "2 App. 2" respectively). And volume 2 does not contain bookmarks? Both volumes contain bookmarks. (Neither volume of the appendix appears to have clickable hyperlinks in the index, so that isn't what the court's whining about.)

I looked at 10th Cir. R. 25.3, 10th Cir. R. 30.1(D), and the 10th Circuit CM/ECF User's Manual at Section III G, without seeing anything that particularly sheds light on their issue.

Perhaps they should take the clerk up on his kind offer and call for clarification of the order.
 
And volume 2 does not contain bookmarks? Both volumes contain bookmarks. (Neither volume of the appendix appears to have clickable hyperlinks in the index, so that isn't what the court's whining about.)
Hyperlink is not an issue:
Screenshot_20220712-163009_Drive.jpg
I am, however, unsure about the bookmark issue. Mayhaps they want them to follow the provided form?

Screenshot_20220712-164457_Drive.jpg
Or more likely they took issue with the lawyers shortening the name of the filings in the bookmarks.
Ok... now I'm genuinely confused. The notice says that pagination of volume two does not begin with the cover page. But volume 1 & 2 are paginated exactly the same way: the cover page doesn't bear a page number, but is page 1, and the numbering begins with page 2 on the page following the cover page ("1 App. 2" or "2 App. 2" respectively)
The issue is the wrong color. See:
Screenshot_20220712-163607_Drive.jpg
Screenshot_20220712-163644_Drive.jpg
Screenshot_20220712-163953_Drive.jpg
They should have raised vol 1 as a mistake too, and that is a failure on the clerk's part.

Perhaps they should take the clerk up on his kind offer and call for clarification of the order.
You'd think so, but they aren't smart enough for that.
 
Russell straight up thinks he's making people jealous when he posts about Vegas. He truly believes that by moving there he's ascended to some out-of-reach greatness that the peasants of Wyoming and Utah can only dream about. That's why he keeps posting about it nonstop. He wants to shove it in their faces that they are still "small fish in a small pond" while he's this high-falutin' city boy with bigger aspirations. He's also trying to convince himself that it's all true, and that he's not just another loser who got fooled into moving to Scamville, USA.

We know his official reason for moving to Vegas was so that he could be closer to the Luxor when he wins AGT, but I think there's more to it. Notice how he always mentions that he lives in Vegas in his comments to Insta-thots? He seems to think that these girls believe that ANYONE who lives in Vegas is important and successful. He thinks he should get 10/10 pussy just by namedropping Vegas. He doesn't need to show pics of his penthouse, or his Lamborghini, or his private resort-style pool to prove his worth. He's Russell Greer and he lives in Vegas and one day he's gonna be big stuff. That's good enough. Those pics he posted prove he's in Vegas. It's irrelevant that they are poorly framed and uninteresting shots of places no one gives a shit about. It's Vegas. Shut up and sex him. Right now he is sitting and waiting for a 10/10 thot to see those pictures and DM him. He *believes* this is going to happen.

The more you think about it, the more pathetic it gets.
 
Back