Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to get pedantic, but I think you meant Rotherham. Rotterdam is a large city in the Netherlands, where tbf there's probably a decent amount of child rape going on.Here's one reason why they didn't wanna talk about the 10 year old rape victim:
View attachment 3491670
View attachment 3491677
For those who don't get the reference, Arabic Muslims have been raping children in Rotterdam, a town / Muslim Colony in Britain, for 40+ years, and the police are too terrified to do anything about it because they don't want to be called racist or risk a human rights complaint. Remembering that something the Arabic Mussies scream when they're denied a fresh underage girl's pussy or boy's anus is that they were having a "sexual emergency" and that their victims should just shut up and take it because they're oppressing the muslims otherwise.
This is still going on today.
The rapist in question this time was an illegal immigrant from one of the taco countries, and the doctor (an abortionist activist with massive press connections) was happy to violate patient confidentiality rules to get a new standard bearer for team baby murder, but she apparently was a whole lot less interested in just how a 10 year old got pregnant. BOTH STATES are mandatory reporting laws which means it's illegal for her not to have told the police and CPS.
To say nothing about how sus it is to cross the boarder when you don't have to. Yes, they're claiming they HAD to becuase of Ohio laws, but Ohio's AG has denied that flat out... and a more common reason to cross state lines is to make it impossible to investigate say, a rape. Roe says a woman, even a 10 year old girl, doesn't have to say anything about the how and why she wants an abortion, and with there being two states jurisdiction, well, it becomes a nightmare. And no, the feds won't help.
View attachment 3491673
Oh, and the police and CPS both apparently knew, but were covering it up, refusing to do anything about it until the press became radioactive, and openly lying to the journalist when she called asking if there were any reports of a 10 year old rape victim. So yeah, We Rotterdam bois. They covered up a 10 year old rape victim for nearly a month because they didn't want the republicans to have a story about a wetback raping a child. And it's entirely possible if not for her raising a stink about how fishy this story was, and the abortion activist rushing to the media to crow about having a new "indefensible" martyr for her causse, they would have just let this die on the vine.
Oh, and woke twitter is out for blood for the PJMedia writer daring to cover this thing in the first place, because it harmed three things the wokies love -- pedophilia, wetbacks, and baby murder.
Edit: Update as of this morning: Indiana's fucking PISSED because they're a mandatory reporting state and the Abortionist Doctor/Activist apparently didn't tell anyone. Because the privacy of the 10 year old (and her rapist) trumped the fact that a 10 year old was raped. I mean hooonestly, why is that anyone's business but the 10 year old who probably doesn't know basic arithmetic yet and the 35 year old illegal Guatemalan that broke into her bedroom, held a hand over her mouth, and forced a baby into her womb?
View attachment 3491619
And the same idiots that made Reddit, Tumblr, Imgur, and Twitter unusable for non-retards are, well, being retarded in the replies:
View attachment 3491621
Like I said, they're fucking PISSED that she dared ruin their little 10 year old sacrifice to Moloch. Instead of a great theoretical victim they could use as an indefensible bludgeon against the Republicans for the rest of time in the abortion debate, whoops, it turns out it was a massive illegal immigration story.
tbf "somebody files a complaint" isn't "they get found in violation"View attachment 3491776
View attachment 3491778
![]()
HIPAA Violation Allegedly Filed Against 10-Year-Old Rape Story Source
The sole source for the story of 10-year-old rape victim who went out of state for an abortion is allegedly facing HIPAA repercussions.thefederalist.com
The feds are now involved. She violated HIPAA to rush out that story to stoke the fires of Moloch, only whoooopsy doodle, doctors aren't allowed to do that.
How badly do you have to fuck up before your own Abortion Clinic files a HIPAA violation against you?
Still tarnishes the medical providers reputation. Practices won't want the liability of having them work under them. Really stupid play on her part.tbf "somebody files a complaint" isn't "they get found in violation"
iirc HIPAA is in part about explicitly IDing the patient so you can say "I have this patient who's a guy and he had a bottle stuck up his ass lolololol" but not "My patient John Buttmansen had a bottle stuck up his ass lolololol"
Here's one reason why they didn't wanna talk about the 10 year old rape victim:
View attachment 3491670
View attachment 3491677
For those who don't get the reference, Arabic Muslims have been raping children in Rotterdam, a town / Muslim Colony in Britain, for 40+ years, and the police are too terrified to do anything about it because they don't want to be called racist or risk a human rights complaint. Remembering that something the Arabic Mussies scream when they're denied a fresh underage girl's pussy or boy's anus is that they were having a "sexual emergency" and that their victims should just shut up and take it because they're oppressing the muslims otherwise.
This is still going on today.
The rapist in question this time was an illegal immigrant from one of the taco countries, and the doctor (an abortionist activist with massive press connections) was happy to violate patient confidentiality rules to get a new standard bearer for team baby murder, but she apparently was a whole lot less interested in just how a 10 year old got pregnant. BOTH STATES are mandatory reporting laws which means it's illegal for her not to have told the police and CPS.
To say nothing about how sus it is to cross the boarder when you don't have to. Yes, they're claiming they HAD to becuase of Ohio laws, but Ohio's AG has denied that flat out... and a more common reason to cross state lines is to make it impossible to investigate say, a rape. Roe says a woman, even a 10 year old girl, doesn't have to say anything about the how and why she wants an abortion, and with there being two states jurisdiction, well, it becomes a nightmare. And no, the feds won't help.
View attachment 3491673
Oh, and the police and CPS both apparently knew, but were covering it up, refusing to do anything about it until the press became radioactive, and openly lying to the journalist when she called asking if there were any reports of a 10 year old rape victim. So yeah, We Rotterdam bois. They covered up a 10 year old rape victim for nearly a month because they didn't want the republicans to have a story about a wetback raping a child. And it's entirely possible if not for her raising a stink about how fishy this story was, and the abortion activist rushing to the media to crow about having a new "indefensible" martyr for her causse, they would have just let this die on the vine.
Oh, and woke twitter is out for blood for the PJMedia writer daring to cover this thing in the first place, because it harmed three things the wokies love -- pedophilia, wetbacks, and baby murder.
Edit: Update as of this morning: Indiana's fucking PISSED because they're a mandatory reporting state and the Abortionist Doctor/Activist apparently didn't tell anyone. Because the privacy of the 10 year old (and her rapist) trumped the fact that a 10 year old was raped. I mean hooonestly, why is that anyone's business but the 10 year old who probably doesn't know basic arithmetic yet and the 35 year old illegal Guatemalan that broke into her bedroom, held a hand over her mouth, and forced a baby into her womb?
View attachment 3491619
And the same idiots that made Reddit, Tumblr, Imgur, and Twitter unusable for non-retards are, well, being retarded in the replies:
View attachment 3491621
Like I said, they're fucking PISSED that she dared ruin their little 10 year old sacrifice to Moloch. Instead of a great theoretical victim they could use as an indefensible bludgeon against the Republicans for the rest of time in the abortion debate, whoops, it turns out it was a massive illegal immigration story.
He was also a wetback and she was murdering a baby, so, well, it's complicated, ok?!Do any left-leaning people ever feel uncomfortable with how often the Democrats end up going to bat for a child rapist?
Snitches get stitches.View attachment 3491776
View attachment 3491778
![]()
HIPAA Violation Allegedly Filed Against 10-Year-Old Rape Story Source
The sole source for the story of 10-year-old rape victim who went out of state for an abortion is allegedly facing HIPAA repercussions.thefederalist.com
The feds are now involved. She violated HIPAA to rush out that story to stoke the fires of Moloch, only whoooopsy doodle, doctors aren't allowed to do that.
How badly do you have to fuck up before your own Abortion Clinic files a HIPAA violation against you?
Yes but Biden has the Palestine loving progressives to deal with so it might get spicy!
Typically left-leaning people who feel that way stop being left-leaning really quick. Everyone used to laugh at those conservative talk shows in the early 00s.Do any left-leaning people ever feel uncomfortable with how often the Democrats end up going to bat for child rapists?
View attachment 3491899
Also the liberal version started becoming super cringe and people began to unironically think it was a news source.Typically left-leaning people who feel that way stop being left-leaning really quick. Everyone used to laugh at those conservative talk shows in the early 00s.
and then too much of what they said started coming true
Why do you think I'm supporting Ron DeSantis so fiercely?Do any left-leaning people ever feel uncomfortable with how often the Democrats end up going to bat for child rapists?
View attachment 3491899
Break the law to not report a rape to authorities.View attachment 3491776
View attachment 3491778
![]()
HIPAA Violation Allegedly Filed Against 10-Year-Old Rape Story Source
The sole source for the story of 10-year-old rape victim who went out of state for an abortion is allegedly facing HIPAA repercussions.thefederalist.com
The feds are now involved. She violated HIPAA to rush out that story to stoke the fires of Moloch, only whoooopsy doodle, doctors aren't allowed to do that.
How badly do you have to fuck up before your own Abortion Clinic files a HIPAA violation against you?
A lefty friend of mine actually said we need to let child sex traffickers through the border, because there are just too many "good" illegal aliens who need our help and deserve to come here, so stopping child rape isn't worth the "cost." That's when I decided I never wanted to talk to a lefty about illegal labor practices again.Typically left-leaning people who feel that way stop being left-leaning really quick. Everyone used to laugh at those conservative talk shows in the early 00s.
and then too much of what they said started coming true
Yeah, there's being left-leaning, and there's being a pedo enabler.A lefty friend of mine actually said we need to let child sex traffickers through the border, because there are just too many "good" illegal aliens who need our help and deserve to come here, so stopping child rape isn't worth the "cost." That's when I decided I never wanted to talk to a lefty about illegal labor practices again.
I’d say they’re becoming like Daleks: they only thing they feel is hatred.Do any left-leaning people ever feel uncomfortable with how often the Democrats end up going to bat for child rapists?
View attachment 3491899
What's the difference?Yeah, there's being left-leaning, and there's being a pedo enabler.
They're okay with anything that gives them more power, or at least, doesn't get in their way.Do any left-leaning people ever feel uncomfortable with how often the Democrats end up going to bat for child rapists?
View attachment 3491899
One wants to downplay pederasty if it means their ideology gets the leg up, the other just wants to hike corporate tax rates and boost welfare spendingWhat's the difference?
One's open-minded within reason and wants to be a good person. The other is too open-minded and concerned with being a good person they let children get molested and abused for woke points.What's the difference?