Artcow WogglebugLoveProductions / Cynthia Hanson / Cherie Anne Hapney - One Womanchild's Fruitless Quest to Make Her Cockroach Husbando a Household Name

What is the Wogglebug's sexual orientation?


  • Total voters
    434
Here's some more wonderful fan art from the Official Wogglebug Fan Club! We are fighting hard against the homosexuals who are trying to spread the false idea that the Wogglebug is of an unnatural orientation. The Wogglebug was created as a positive role model for children to fight back against homosexual so-called "pride" that is undermining our culture.

IMG_6618.jpeg

I believe one of the best ways to express my love for the Wogglebug and why I love him is first of all through the lyrics of this song. Especially in the final verse:

What a touching and beautiful piece of music.
 
At this point they are two completely separate characters, with Cherie’s Wogglebug being the character in name/backstory only. Even after all this time of lurking this entire thread I still cannot fully understand why she doesn’t just make him into her own OC already instead of continuing to hang onto the Oz IP by a thread; but I guess doing so would remove him of whatever makes him so attract— ahem- I mean, appealing to her.
While I really can (and could) go much more and deeper into detail about why I find him so appealing and just refuse to make him into my own OC, it's just I feel I already know the things you will all likely say about it (and things you just might do also). However, I will at least mention these things. Making him into my own OC was just never what my dream for him was. My dream for him always was (and still is) about the fact I felt he was always just out of place in Oz and needs to have his own fandom away from all of it. And I also will admit I had been able to identify with that sort of thing about him from the moment I realized it about it and that was one of the things that made me feel empathy toward him.
 
I don't think she's ever truly explained why she likes him so much.
The damn bug IS her from her perspective, a misunderstood social inept knowitall demonized by society and maybe even its creator to look twisted and wrong. To redeem the cockroach will mean redemption for her autistic self.
 
I've now done what I had intended to do originally, and I have changed all the instances in the third movie of when it looked even remotely like Wogglebug and Frogman might be gay because they are not. I have changed the hug when they meet to a handshake. ANd they are no longer actually clasping hands during the song sequence, either. As you can see here:


You can call me homophobic all you want to. I just don't care.

Their friendship is like Damon and Pythias from Greek mythology, friends like brothers.
Great. Boys and men already struggle with showing care and emotion with each other (usually, ironically, in fear of being called gay)
Hugs are totally normal for humans regardless of sexuality, and having shown froggy and woggy hugging would have shown kids it's ok to do platonic touching to grow closer. Do better.

And of course we don't think you're homophobic Cheri!
You already told us about your new girlfriend! How are you two doing btw?
Can't wait for the woggleplushies too btw! I love supporting fellow lesbian artists ;)
 
While I really can (and could) go much more and deeper into detail about why I find him so appealing and just refuse to make him into my own OC, it's just I feel I already know the things you will all likely say about it (and things you just might do also). However, I will at least mention these things. Making him into my own OC was just never what my dream for him was. My dream for him always was (and still is) about the fact I felt he was always just out of place in Oz and needs to have his own fandom away from all of it. And I also will admit I had been able to identify with that sort of thing about him from the moment I realized it about it and that was one of the things that made me feel empathy toward him.
What drivel.

And just an FYI. The Wogglebug isn't real and he doesn't love you. Feeling empathy towards a literary character is a sign you have a childish mind.

Boys and men already struggle with showing care and emotion with each other (usually, ironically, in fear of being called gay)
Hugs are totally normal for humans regardless of sexuality, and having shown froggy and woggy hugging would have shown kids it's ok to do platonic touching to grow closer. Do better.
She can't do better. This is it. This is her doing the best she can.

But Cynthia doesn't know how to human so she uses what she sees on TV and in movies as indications of how humans act with each other. This is why her first attempt at these things is so inept and all the flaws need to be pointed out to her. She doesn't see them because in her mind, it's already perfect.
 
What drivel.

And just an FYI. The Wogglebug isn't real and he doesn't love you. Feeling empathy towards a literary character is a sign you have a childish mind.
eh, I don’t personally think it’s a bad thing to feel empathy/sympathy for fictional characters; it allows the audience to connect and relate to them in order to become more engaged with the story.

I think it’s one of those things where you can acknowledge a character isn’t real while still relating to said character, Otherwise you end up with situations like these where that relation becomes a full-blown obsession (and an unhealthy one at that). I do believe there’s such thing as connecting to a character too much (as is the case here).

Chasing after a fictional character’s love/approval is as tantalizing as it is pointless (and also uncomfortable as hell).
 
I've legitimately always thought that she subconsciously conflated him as the personification of her repressed sexuality as a womanchild.
Obsessing over him to a literal fetishistic extent, Freudian to the extreme!
Squeezing her "Mr. Wogglebug" until he starts uncontrollably "crying" so that she has to hug him even tighter, and faster...
5b820276-6c64-4806-8d71-2249d8283985_1.608dddde315773d3d924fc57bafe7de1 (1).jpeg
 
Last edited:
Well, in my opinion, Cynthia just a very emotionally repressed person who genuinely doesn't know what love is. When Woggie makes her feel funny "down there", she just doesn't connect the dots. Same with her thinking that everbody sees Wogglebug as perfect and charming. Obviously she loves him and thinks Wogglebug is adorable, but since she is retarted and doesn't understand how hormones work, she thinks other people feel the same towards Wogglebug.

I feel this has something to do with her fundie mother. Maybe she never had "the talk" and was yelled at for showing curiousity about "adult" stuff. That, or she was raped by a man in a cockroach suit.

Sigmund_Freud,_by_Max_Halberstadt_(cropped).jpg

Oh, and I have another very interesting theory about her relationship with Wogglebug. Beforehand I need to say that I'm very sorry for double posting, but I need to get it off my chest before I forgot what the hell I came up with.

So, my theory is that Cherie is a pedophile. And I'm not talking about her making Wogglebug a pedophile. Considering that he loves to hang out with a little girl who flashes her panties too much. No, I mean that her love towards Woggie is pedophilic in nature. Ok, follow me here.

Everybody thinks that Wogglebug is a fag. Why wouldn't he? He acts like a faggot, always crying and being too whimsical and naive. He dresses like a faggot in bright and colourful clothing. He has a faggot friend Frogman who hangs out with him in some weird locations. He even has his own faghag Silvya.

But what if I say that Wogglebug is not, in fact, a raging homosexual, but rather a pedophilic fantasy of a naive child in a body of a grown ass cockroach man? Cherie herself always described Wogglebug as childlike, accentuating his inner child and purity. You might mistake those qualities for him being a twink, a fag, whatever. He is very effeminate indeed. In fact, I can say that despite being male, he hardly has any manly qualities. But he is not man enough because of his faggotry, no, it's because he is a boy. As is, a small naive boy, who is pure and gentle and doesn't have any maturity in him. See here what I mean? It's known that pedos are attracted to smal children because of their untainted nature. And that what Cherie does. She created Wogglebug, a Peter Pen like character who displays all traits of a pedophile fantasy despite being an adult man.

He is childish, naive, emotional, whimsical, pure and friendly. He is a 5 year old in your local playground who wants to befriend everybody he meets. He also dresses in bright colorful clothes, because of that you might think of him as a hipster or dandy. But that's because he dresses like a kid.

Next thing. He mostly hangs out with kids. We always see him spending time with Silvya and other girls. It's not because he is a pedo himself, but rather because he likes a company of like kinded people. That is, small children. He has his own father figure - Dr. Knowitall, and likes to flash his brown body for his daddy. He is ostracized by "adults" because of his immaturity, like denizens of Oz who fucking hate him for being a kid. You might say that he has an adult friend Frogman, but this is irrelevant. Their friendship is also very childish. Holding hands with your bro is only okay if you are both 6 y.o..

So, you can see what I'm trying to tell. Another piece of the pazzle is that Cherie depicts Wogglebug in a very sexual way. You might compare it to known lolicon artists who badly hide their fantasies. I might compare it to Made in Abyss, which is written by a pedophile. It's not explicitly sexual, but you can't help but feel that aomething is wrong. Same thing with Wogglebug. His portrayal just rubs me the wrong way.

Now, with all I wrote, I came to a conclusion that Cherie is a proxy pedo. Keep your kids away from her. She even looks like a pedo. Jesus Christ, I feel dirty for writing all this shit.
 
Jesus Christ, I feel dirty for writing all this shit.
I feel dirty even for reading people's speculations on the imaginary sex life of a mentally disabled, sheltered, and enabled woman, but here I am I guess.

Unfortunately even without being sheltered and coddled, subnormal people do sexually cringy, childlike, and inappropriate shit. It's just a fact of life. For example one of my boomer relatives was brain damaged at birth. He has 'Baby Got Back' as his phone ringtone and I only know this because it went off (loudly) at a family funeral. He manages to hold down a menial job, but it's only with quite a bit of support (e.g. being driven there, because his licence got taken away), and he's had violent outbursts on numerous occasions over his frustration over not being able to keep up with his coworkers (as well as over generally being treated like a child.)

And I think most people on Furaffinity and Deviantart posting badly drawn fetish art of Paw Patrol or whatever are just mentally subnormal and/or autistic people living in group homes. Insofar as adults who are treated like children (because they have the capacities of children) have sexual feelings, you would not expect them to find a normal or mature pornographic outlet.

People tend to develop psychosexual shit over stuff they are insecure about and/or familiar with (for example the stereotype of highly status-insecure men being femdom fetishists.) If you're infantilised by other people because you're autistic (which also often goes along with bowel issues - many autistic people are incontinent) frankly why would you not develop an ABDL fetish. Likewise if you have severe negative childhood experiences around people scrutinising and controlling your weight and what you eat why would you not develop, say, a feeder fetish.

It's probably best to just ignore it and thank God that's not you, because it's never going to go away. We should stop reinforcing and advertising WoggleBugLover-esque behaviour by giving it any kind of attention. But unfortunately people having fun by making an in-joke out of sexually harassing literally retarded people (CWC is another example of this) also seems to be a fact of life. Life's a piece of shit when you look at it, you know?
 
Last edited:
I feel dirty even for reading people's speculations on the imaginary sex life of a mentally disabled, sheltered, and enabled woman, but here I am I guess.

Unfortunately even without being sheltered and coddled, subnormal people do sexually cringy, childlike, and inappropriate shit. It's just a fact of life. For example one of my boomer relatives was brain damaged at birth. He has 'Baby Got Back' as his phone ringtone and I only know this because it went off (loudly) at a family funeral. He manages to hold down a menial job, but it's only with quite a bit of support (e.g. being driven there, because his licence got taken away), and he's had violent outbursts on numerous occasions over his frustration over not being able to keep up with his coworkers (as well as over generally being treated like a child.)

And I think most people on Furaffinity and Deviantart posting badly drawn fetish art of Paw Patrol or whatever are just mentally subnormal and/or autistic people living in group homes. Insofar as adults who are treated like children (because they have the capacities of children) have sexual feelings, you would not expect them to find a normal or mature pornographic outlet.

People tend to develop psychosexual shit over stuff they are insecure about and/or familiar with (for example the stereotype of highly status-insecure men being femdom fetishists.) If you're infantilised by other people because you're autistic (which also often goes along with bowel issues - many autistic people are incontinent) frankly why would you not develop an ABDL fetish. Likewise if you have severe negative childhood experiences around people scrutinising and controlling your weight and what you eat why would you not develop, say, a feeder fetish.

It's probably best to just ignore it and thank God that's not you, because it's never going to go away. We should stop reinforcing and advertising WoggleBugLover-esque behaviour by giving it any kind of attention. But unfortunately people having fun by making an in-joke out of sexually harassing literally retarded people (CWC is another example of this) also seems to be a fact of life. Life's a piece of shit when you look at it, you know?
Are you at all familiar with Manda-Tee?
 
Its always interesting to see when women go for cartoon characters etc as usually men seem to do that. But maybe it was seeing this documentary back in the day that biased me into thinking that the more female thing was being in love with inanimate structural objects like the Berlin Wall, bridges, and the Eiffel Tower.

(Do enjoy lol)
 
More important updates from the talented lady who created the Wogglebug franchise!


And a video with additional informative updates. At first I thought this was another live action video, but around the halfway point I realized it was actually a sophisticated and lifelike form of computer animation.


having shown froggy and woggy hugging would have shown kids it's ok to do platonic touching to grow closer. Do better.
Stop trying to indoctrinate children! Wogglebug is straight! He only has sex with FEMALES!!!!
 
Last edited:
Back