- Joined
- Apr 28, 2022
James' response: "lol it's not a country flag you BELLEND!"
A rare occasion where “No, you!” would‘ve been a wittier retort.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
James' response: "lol it's not a country flag you BELLEND!"
Jim Sterling used to be a standup comedian before doing the Jimquisition. I'm starting to think there's a reason that never took off.Jim's comebacks on twitter amount to him purposely believing that something someone said as a joke was a serious statement and then mocking the person for saying it seriously.
View attachment 3503068
James' response: "lol it's not a country flag you BELLEND!"
Doesn't he have a Patreon and youtube account? How the fuck is he unaware of other subscription-based services?JQ QRD:
- Jim rants about (admittedly ridiculous) subscription services for heated car seats, apparently unaware paid extras have been a thing in cars forever.
- Jim actually thinks video game microtransactions are to blame for this, again ignoring or unaware of the fact subscription services have existed for decades.
- Jim basically complains that things now are different to how things were when he was young. Literally 'old man yells at the Cloud.'
- Jim is either ignoring or unaware he is under no obligation to use any of these services and alternatives always exist.
- Jim thinks free trials are exploitative because people forget to cancel. Nothing is ever the consoomer's fault.
- Jim is either ignoring or unaware he is under no obligation to use any of these services.
- (I didn't repeat myself on that last one; he puts up a list of every subscription service he can think of as if they're mandatory.)
- "CAPITALISM IS BAD BECAUSE I CAN'T CONTROL MYSELF.
Doesn't he have a Patreon and youtube account? How the fuck is he unaware of other subscription-based services?
Some trial services are worse than others but nowadays with most are really easy to cancel, others can be a pain when for some reason you can easily sign up online for a trial but have to get in contact with their support department to cancel or something like that, at worst though it's just a time wasting inconvenience.
- Jim thinks free trials are exploitative because people forget to cancel. Nothing is ever the consoomer's fault.
The only one I've ever had any trouble with is Nord VPN, after they set my subscription to auto-renew at three times the price and you have to click through 4 or 5 confirmation screens to say you're really super sure you want to disable it. Still only took me about 5 minutes to sort, though.Some trial services are worse than others but nowadays with most are really easy to cancel, others can be a pain when for some reason you can easily sign up online for a trial but have to get in contact with their support department to cancel or something like that, at worst though it's just a time wasting inconvenience.
But yeah if you're such a consoomer you need to keep signing up to services and then forget to cancel it's really on you, especially since you can just sign up with PayPal and turn off automatic payments.
Some trial services are worse than others but nowadays with most are really easy to cancel, others can be a pain when for some reason you can easily sign up online for a trial but have to get in contact with their support department to cancel or something like that, at worst though it's just a time wasting inconvenience.
But yeah if you're such a consoomer you need to keep signing up to services and then forget to cancel it's really on you, especially since you can just sign up with PayPal and turn off automatic payments.
A lot of these wanton consoomers get into the mindset where they see "Free Trial" and feel like they absolutely have to consume the service - its free, and they'd be stupid to not, right? Its really a peak consumerism complaint right there. But you try to explain to them that its stupid to do so, especially when you're not already in the habit of reviewing subscriptions and such, and they'll rage at you with a bizarre sense of entitlement to this free shit. It really makes you start to realize just why most people have less than a months expenses in the banks these days. Nobody has any modicum of self control anymore.But yeah if you're such a consoomer you need to keep signing up to services and then forget to cancel it's really on you, especially since you can just sign up with PayPal and turn off automatic payments.
It's on the same level as the tumblr ball pit.Some of you are being a lot more charitable than I am going to be; this is straight up fucking pathetic. I've done a lot of amateur/independent events in the past in a different line of work and you always give them leeway because they obviously don't have the resources or experience of the big guys, but if I turned up to something like this to punt my trade I would be furious.
This is a literal joke. And the punchline is Jim claiming it's evidence of his wrestling 'career' taking off.
(Caveat to say if this is just a show people are putting on for the fun of it then more power to them, but a children's soft-play area is still a bizarre location choice.)
The based response is "Transylvania"Jim's comebacks on twitter amount to him purposely believing that something someone said as a joke was a serious statement and then mocking the person for saying it seriously.
View attachment 3503068
James' response: "lol it's not a country flag you BELLEND!"
It is shitty, but as always, it's there for a reason and helps both sides. These vehicles are not cheap. These options are not cheap. People vote for more and more regulations and standards on vehicles every year, and this is going to pay for it, much like how people expect a billion dollars pumped into Battlefield 20 and have servers operate for free for ten years. The cost needs to be eaten somewhere.Admittedly, having to pay or a mechanical function in your car will be disabled sounds like fucking nonsense. At least say, GPS is dependent on outside infrastructure.
The thing about Jim is that he's broadly correct about things like this, companies are always trying their damnedest to nickle and dime their customers in the most absurd fucking ways if they feel they can get away with it, and it says something about the state of society that it can happen. But he's always super late on topics like this and has nothing really to add. Like I heard about the subscription warmed seats at least a week ago (and I don't have any interest at all in car culture) and he can't bring anything to the topic because the extent of his contribution is restating the obvious point made everywhere else that this is a ridiculous attempt to squeeze people for money for a feature that should be automatically available for no extra monthly charge in a car that has warmed seats regardless.Admittedly, having to pay or a mechanical function in your car will be disabled sounds like fucking nonsense. At least say, GPS is dependent on outside infrastructure.
This was a point I wanted to add in my notes, but I try (emphasis on try) to keep them brief. It's true that more and more subscription services are being pushed these days, but it's also true that most of them are easier than ever to cancel. A lot of them don't even have fixed contracts any more; you can leave any time you want.I bring this up because I think its funny that it undercuts Jim in that a lot if this shit, by how much has actually been fixed. Especially because I'm not even sure this was just one game. And I know these free trials have all been fucking awful. So, it has actually been just getting worse.
I don't agree it should be automatically available because it's not vital to the car's operation, but making it a subscription service makes absolutely no sense because it's already in the car and it's never going to do anything different or be updated in any way, so it'd be like subscribing to watch the same season of Friends, forever, instead of just buying the boxset.this is a ridiculous attempt to squeeze people for money for a feature that should be automatically available for no extra monthly charge in a car that has warmed seats regardless.
From what I understand in this specific case, they still offer the ability to just pay for it outright. I can imagine this actually being a boon to consumers, at least in the short term- you don't have to produce a car with thirty different options packages, and you also get an income stream from providing the extra options every single unit produced. That means lower costs on the production line at scale, those who don't care for it probably won't be seeing a cost increase, those who want it will pay it for it, and those who are in the middle will be the whales that upkeep the whole operation. I can imagine quite a few people will be thanking car companies that they can now test an option for a month and then decide to buy it without having to go and trade in their car or go in for upgrades or any of that hassle with the risk of even more cash being spent.I don't agree it should be automatically available because it's not vital to the car's operation, but making it a subscription service makes absolutely no sense because it's already in the car and it's never going to do anything different or be updated in any way, so it'd be like subscribing to watch the same season of Friends, forever, instead of just buying the boxset.
It should have been a one-off extra payment if anything, but making it a subscription service can't be justified because it requires absolutely no upkeep or refinement on the manufacturer's part once it's been installed, barring repairs which I'm willing to bet your subscription doesn't cover.
I mean that's the difference really, having extra options that can be added to a car, or any other product, for an extra charge has been the norm for decades and people generally accept that. But if you buy something with a feature already in built but you need to pay extra to 'unlock' it and it can be shut down again remotely at any time, usually because you didn't pay this month's fee, that's bullshit. You basically don't fully own what you bought at that point, you're kind of renting the product and its features from the company who can always hover their hand over it to intrude on your freedom to use it.I don't agree it should be automatically available because it's not vital to the car's operation, but making it a subscription service makes absolutely no sense because it's already in the car and it's never going to do anything different or be updated in any way, so it'd be like subscribing to watch the same season of Friends, forever, instead of just buying the boxset.
It should have been a one-off extra payment if anything, but making it a subscription service can't be justified because it requires absolutely no upkeep or refinement on the manufacturer's part once it's been installed, barring repairs which I'm willing to bet your subscription doesn't cover.
As I said, I think a line has been crossed when the feature is actually present in the car regardless of who its sold to but is intentionally throttled so it can't be used by people who aren't paying the subscription. Preferably they should just make it so that heated seats are on by default for anyone who buys this car since its possible to use it in any of these particular cars they sell.From what I understand in this specific case, they still offer the ability to just pay for it outright. I can imagine this actually being a boon to consumers, at least in the short term- you don't have to produce a car with thirty different options packages, and you also get an income stream from providing the extra options every single unit produced. That means lower costs on the production line at scale, those who don't care for it probably won't be seeing a cost increase, those who want it will pay it for it, and those who are in the middle will be the whales that upkeep the whole operation. I can imagine quite a few people will be thanking car companies that they can now test an option for a month and then decide to buy it without having to go and trade in their car or go in for upgrades or any of that hassle with the risk of even more cash being spent.
It certainly feels shitty, and my gut is shouting "NO", but at the same time I can see the benefits. These things are going to happen regardless. A good consumer advocate, who isn't Jim, would be looking at this and trying to find out how best to use products-as-live-service to their advantage. People complain about subscribing to things all the time now, but then they don't want to spend $350 on getting every single season of the Simpson's on BluRay. Then they'll bitch and moan in ten years that they can't find any episodes with black Smithers or Apu anywhere except by paying someone $1,000 for a hard copy on eBay. $10 says that retard's Jim.