Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Piggy is making some demands:

3.png

Meanwhile, one of the rascals contacts Merrick Garland on piggy's behalf:

mg1.pngmg2.png
 
I wonder how triggered Pat gets when he sees a can of Pringles or an ad for Pringles. He doesn’t associate with anyone stylish enough to wear Pringle of Scotland sweaters, but I’m sure seeing one would turn him into a pile of quivering terror.
I don't know but I like the way the review is written- such that, if there is any oversight at all, Piggy can't just have it deleted without explaining the reference. Imagine calling up amazon support and trying to explaining pringles to some Indian dude
How are they under criminal investigation if it was just brought to your attention?
It's all meaningless. He seems to think that someone out there is taking everything he says seriously, despite all evidence to the contrary. IIRC his only 'action' was self-initiated through the courts and knocked down as soon as it was actually reviewed

or maybe it's a cope where he thinks OTHER people will believe his fantasy?
 
And why are there no references to whatever source he copied for the science but every single movie he cites gets a reference?
Amusingly this set of citations is incredibly weird. In the section he tries to make the argument that because our asteroid belt is a certain way all asteroid belts must be a certain way and therefore the Empire Strikes Back depicting a more heavily populated asteroid belt is scientifically unrealistic. Nowhere does he bother to support his claim that all asteroid belts must resemble ours. The only thing cited in any of these claims is that Empire Strikes Back depicts an asteroid belt to which he cites... Empire Strikes Back.

Really speaks to the quality of the rest of this book that its editors allowed Patirck to do this.
 
It literally looks like they're watching a special needs child trying a new hobby. I can almost picture the over-fawning applause when he holds it up in order to bolster his confidence.
It's much too innocent and sweet for Milwaukee's most prolific pepperoni maker. Although Mama Raven stuffing her poor retarded baby's face until he's so fat isn't so innocent, especially since special needs Pat probably tardrages when Mama Raven doesn't stuff his gullet every night. Imagine the sort of people who'd have to be special needs Pat's tard wranglers.
Amusingly this set of citations is incredibly weird. In the section he tries to make the argument that because our asteroid belt is a certain way all asteroid belts must be a certain way and therefore the Empire Strikes Back depicting a more heavily populated asteroid belt is scientifically unrealistic. Nowhere does he bother to support his claim that all asteroid belts must resemble ours. The only thing cited in any of these claims is that Empire Strikes Back depicts an asteroid belt to which he cites... Empire Strikes Back.
First time I heard that the Empire Strikes Back scene is unrealistic I was like 6 and read it in a pop science book. Since that's the reading level that our 1.2 GPA special boy Pat is on, he WOULD have cited the children's book but his fat-addled mind corrected it to Empire Strikes Back.

Now he is correct that all asteroid belts don't have that sort of density, since space is fucking huge and over millions of years they'll be naturally very spaced apart as they spread out from collisions and gravity from other objects in their solar system (now a recently disrupted planet or moon would look like the asteroid belt in Empire Strikes Back). But like everything in his chapter he seems mostly focused on citing movies instead of any actual scientific source. Maybe he just lifted it from some popular astronomy book he read to look smart and thought it would look bad if all his citations were one source.
 
Candidates at the NFL combine bench 225 lb. I guess Pat is just so naturally gifted that he can outlift real athletes dedicating their lives to physical excellence. What a cool dude who is in no way delusional or a bad liar.
I'd imagine he meant 250 lbs 1RM, while the NFL-Combine is 225 lbs AMRAP, where these fellas regularly do over 20 reps, with the most elite ones going over 40, so their 1RM would probably be over 500 lbs.
I buy his 250 lbs bench as much as I buy MoobieBlob's 310 lbs bench.
 
This has to have been done already, but Marathon Pat is just too exploitable. How is one man so eminently memeable.
View attachment 3505710

I'm out for a smoke and I may have woken my neighbors up with how this made me lose it laughing.

Here's one from me, I call it "misery stacks":
Adobe_20220719_003116.jpg

ETA to not double post:
I had toAdobe_20220719_010140.jpg

"Patrick, it's me from the future. Don't let Ade do it, she's going to leave you!"

"Wrong again, child."
 
Last edited:
Mama Raven is probably too much of a Boomer to understand how to check notifications so idk if she'll see this but thought it was funny. Very subtle too.
Screenshot_20220719-011039_2.png
In all honesty, been thinking about how she replied to Pat's tweets in the same weird fucking way Pat always does. It's such a Norman Bates situation. Is she the hive queen? Did she spawn this deranged mindset and infect her son with it? Who else has she done this to? Why did Kyle turn out ok?

And if she is Twitter savvy, what the fuck would she, a "psychologist", make of this behaviour? Pat just had to correcT the record but then deleted all these tweet replies. Maybe he doesn't want Mamma seeing what a neurotic fruit loop he is?
Screenshot_20220719-013102_2.pngScreenshot_20220719-012524-510.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mama Raven is probably too much of a Boomer to understand how to check notifications so idk if she'll see this but thought it was funny. Very subtle too.

View attachment 3505791
In all honesty, been thinking about how she replied to Pat's tweets in the same weird fucking way Pat always does. It's such a Norman Bates situation. Is she the hive queen? Did she spawn this deranged mindset and infect her son with it? Who else has she done this to? Why did Kyle turn out ok?

And if she is Twitter savvy, what the fuck would she, a "psychologist", make of this behaviour? Pat just had to correcT the record but then deleted all these tweet replies. Maybe he doesn't want Mamma seeing what a neurotic fruit loop he is?
View attachment 3505797
View attachment 3505799
Patrick will never learn that all he's doing is giving the trolls exactly what they want. He's fat, too.
 
Back