Science Record Temperatures Are Scorching Europe: How We Can Save the Planet

Link (Archive)
Record Temperatures Are Scorching Europe: How We Can Save the Planet

Tuesday is predicted to be the hottest day ever recorded in British history, as this week, Europe gets blasted by an unprecedented and punishing heat wave. The sweltering temperatures have sent many cities into crisis mode, as people unused to living in climates above 100 degrees have to adapt to a new reality: Climate change is here.

As Western Europe faces temperatures above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (or nearly 40 Celcius) in Portugal, Spain, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom many without working airconditioning, the pressing question becomes what, if anything, can each of us do right now to stop further heating of our planet? The answer, or part of it, is as simple as changing the way we eat and lowering our food systems' production of greenhouse gases.

European Countries React to Record Temperatures​

In England, officials are painting railroad tracks white and telling commuters to stay home, in the hopes that they can prevent the tracks from buckling in the extreme heat. British citizens are experiencing the first-ever “Extreme Red” heat warning, a new level of danger in a country where many businesses and homes don't have AC. In fields, farmers are inspecting crops that appear to be cooking on the vine. As crops fail, food prices soar. The time to make changes in how we eat and how we think about our food is here..

Europe’s heatwave places climate change front and center on the agenda as European lawmakers scramble to address the dangerous temperatures. With European infrastructure unfit to accommodate higher temperatures, this heat wave is exposing how unprepared the world is for the real impacts of climate change and high greenhouse gas emissions.

Between July 10 and July 15, approximately 360 people died due to extreme heat in Spain. On Saturday, the Portuguese health ministry told Reuters that over 650 people died due to heat-related causes, meaning that one person died every forty minutes between July 7 and 13. In France, 14,000 citizens have evacuated from the southwest regions due to forest fires.

“This is not just summer,” Green French lawmaker Melanie Vogel wrote on Twitter. “It is just hell and will pretty soon become just the end of human life if we continue with our climate inaction.

On July 7, the European Union’s executive stated that the continent would face one of the worst seasons in regards to climate disasters. The EU warned citizens of droughts and wildfires to continue to worsen over the course of the summer. Drought conditions have worsened in Greece and Italy – where the government has declared a state of emergency across the Northern regions. The EU executive attributes this change to worsening climate change.

Stalled Climate Action in the United States​

Meanwhile, in the US, two-thirds of the continental map is in a "red zone" of record temperatures, and climate change policy initiatives have stalled in a divided Senate.

President Biden and congressional Democrats developed a climate policy package over the last two years that would have finally been able to break the gridlock that has stalled environmentally-conscious legislation. Supported by 49 senators, Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) blocked the Build Back Better bill, stalling climate change action. Machin’s disapproval of the bill will cut regulations to cut carbon pollution and gut subsidies intended for the clean energy section.

This closely follows the Supreme Court decision to roll back environmental protections carried out by the Environmental Protection Agency. The decision will limit the EPA’s ability to regulate power plant carbon emissions. The three dissenting justices state that the six justices responsible stole the EPA’s power to respond to the most pressing environmental challenge of our time.”

What Can We Each Do About Climate Change?​

Despite all this grim news and government inaction, there is something we each can do to help dial back or slow the march of climate change, and that is to change our diets. By eating more plant-based and less red meat and animal protein, each of us can drastically reduce our impact on the release of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere by our food systems.

This April, the United Nations released its latest climate change report that emphasized that while the consequences of climate change have already started, there’s still time to combat worsening environmental issues. The report highlighted that governments and citizens can effectively curb climate change by using less carbon energy, reducing atmospheric Co2, and most easily, eating plant-based.

Eating for the environment is the easiest and quickest method to help curb climate change. Now, 55 percent of consumers consider the sustainability of their food choices when grocery shopping, meaning that most shoppers can be considered climatarians. Coined in 2015, the Cambridge Dictionary defines a climatarian as "a person who chooses what to eat according to what is least harmful to the environment."

Climatarians represent the most recent category of plant-based or plant-forward dieters. The quick rise of the climatarian can be attributed to increased consumer awareness. Climate change is directly affecting millions of people worldwide. Last year, Extreme weather events cost the US $145 billion in damages and many hundreds of lives lost, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Information (NCEI). With these numbers set to get worse, here’s why eating plant-based can help reduce the consequence and slow down climate change.

Why Eating Plant-Based is More Environmentally Friendly​

  • Animal agriculture is responsible for 57 percent of food-related greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Plant-based diets can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 61 percent.
  • Meat and dairy products currently use 83 percent of total farmland, according to The Guardian.
  • Eating plant-based twice a week for a year is the equivalent of planting 14 billion trees by helping minimize land use and reversing deadly greenhouse gas emissions
  • Eating plant-based for one day saves enough water to take 100 showers.
  • Eating plant-based for one day is the equivalent of NOT driving your car that day.
  • Eating just one plant-based meal a day for a year saves the carbon equivalent of not driving from New York to Los Angeles, according to One Plant-Based Meal a Day founder Suzy Amis Cameron.
  • Eating plant-based helps foster biodiversity and protect approximately 626 species from losing habitable areas.
  • An Impossible Burger requires 78 times less land use to create than a conventional beef burger.
  • Eating beef one to two times a week for a year contributes six to 30 times more missions than plant alternatives such as tofu.

How You Can Start Eating Plant-Based​

Looking to eat and shop with the planet in mind? Check out The Beet's plant-based Beginner's Guide. Incorporating even one plant-based meal a day helps the environment by curbing the risk factors associated with animal agriculture. No matter if you start as a vegetarian, flexitarian, vegan, partly-plant-based, or climatarian diet, any shift towards plant-forward eating helps slow down the lethal consequences of climate change.

Soon, products may have labels that will inform shoppers about how sustainable their food choices are. Most recently, Denmark announced that its government will introduce climate-conscious labels on food products. The initiative intends to help improve customer choices and keep companies accountable for their impact on the environment and the climate crisis.
 
Serious question: how come the ONLY "solution" ever offered by these guys to a warming planet is "stop eating all animal products, and live on a diet of bugs and weeds"? Sometimes they'll talk about not flying, which is ok because giant jumbo jets use fucktons of fuel and spew incredible amounts of pollution, but pretty much all they EVER say is "live on a diet of bugs and weeds to save the planet".

They have been claiming for 50 years that most of the methane in the atmosphere is from cow farts. Only recently have they acknowledged that abandoned oil wells are farting far more methane than cows. They talk about goats and sheep being more natural lawnmowers than gasoline powered mowers, but they never mention that goats and sheep are edible, not only their meat but their milk too, and goat and sheep milk is far less likely to cause allergic reactions in humans than cow milk. Bird meats, such as chicken and turkey, are far less destructive than cow and pig, and chicken eggs are edible too. Duck and quail are also good eating, and in China quail eggs are used in some dishes.

There are options, along with such things as solar panels, wind turbines, monitoring electricity usage of appliances and electronics with cheap portable meters (called "Kill-A-Watt" in the US) so you know where your electricity use is going and thus can use timers and inline switches to reduce electricity waste, and so on. But no, it's ALWAYS eat bugs and weeds. That's all they ever say.
It's exactly why anybody with more than half a brain shouldn't trust this shit. The whole thing is a grift. It's much easier to get your grant money when you claim that an impending disaster is coming. Hell, set a date that is close enough to be alarming but far enough to duck out of when it becomes clear that it isn't going to happen with new models that are just as flawed. This works especially well with politicians, since they love the angle to get votes and anybody who actually targets corruption tends to be rooted out rather quickly. The other day I had to sit in on a meeting about how great carbon credits were while they waxed on about how great their cookstove credits were. Bullshit, if you give people in sub Saharan Africa more efficient cookstoves for free, you aren't just getting a 1:1 replacement for standing fires, you are creating a net carbon gain because now they have the fuel for far more fires. So there's another group that will play this retarded game, banks that have a new bullshit commodity to sell.
None of the people who actually push this stuff take it seriously. They talk about solutions like wind and solar when nuclear exists, the politicians who just forced everybody to only interact online decide they need to fly their jets over to Glasgow to discuss the climate instead of doing it remote, and the carbon credit trade favors higher carbon coverage for the lowest investment (which also means it still is a net gain of carbon). Journos love it for obvious reasons, end of the world scares are great for gaining clicks.
I'm not saying it isn't worth it to examine the effects humanity has on the climate and in the globe as a whole. I think there could be valuable research in that, but it's not even worth exploring so long as as the lies persist. Until I see the research grants being pulled from scientists producing bunk results, until I see politicians and bankers too afraid to jump into their private jets for fear of turning the earth into an uninhabitable wasteland, until I see greentards embrace the potential of nuclear energy, and until I see journalists thrown into the gaping maw of an active volcano, climate science is not worthy of even being used as toilet paper.
 
If I remember my train 'tism right they're not buckling because they're softening or warping, but because each piece of rail starts to expand against each other piece as the temperature goes up until some piece just gets pushed out. They'll have designed the rails to account for that to some degree but I imagine current conditions were outside their expectations.
Train tracks stretch for miles (albeit with sections welded abutting against each other). A little bit of thermal expansion will add up over that distance. Even if 4 inches of ordinary expansion turns into 8 inches in this heat, that might be enough for stuff to pop out of place.
Unless item 1 on the list is "no more mansions and private jets" you can fuck off.
More like nuke China and erect many more nuclear plants over hippie protestations.
 
I'm willing to believe in man-made global warming but these Belgian weasels seem to care more about funneling money from the US than actually solving real problems. Forget nuclear energy and natural gas, the answer is to eat the bugs and fund EU social programs with money from Idaho.
 
Last edited:
Pain in my sweaty balls in NJ. Newark 40 miles east should reach 100.

FireShot Capture 443 - Clinton, NJ Mo__ - https___www.accuweather.com_en_us_.png

Either the yearly summer heat wave or.....

The Reptilians are terraforming the planet for their takeover.
 
@Gottahavemysips: El Comandante is willing to believe that the world is warming, but the world has been warmer than now in the past and it didn't have all this batshit insane weather. I'm more on the side of blaming human pollution, after all there are literally little beads of plastic in the blood of most humans living now, and fish off the coast of California are inedible because they're full of fabric fibers from washing machine runoff and mercury residue from 19th century gold mines, and I should mention shit like male fish with eggs in their testes due to water full of female hormones pissed out by women on The Pill. (That's why I'm willing to think that, yeah, transgenderism may be a thing with a small part of the human population, but 97% or so is still autists wanting to be popular by attention whoring.)

Of course the gorillionaires who are pushing climate doomerism don't want to give up their cushy lives even though most of the pollution is caused by the top 1% and their over the top lives of 30k sq ft mansions, Rolls Royce Cullinans that are "bespoke" (aka customized to their personal specs), and Gulfstream VI private jets with the requisite bespokeness. If they would live like the rest of us live now, never mind Agenda 21 and such, pollution would go way down. Why the fuck can't they have their stupid climate summits over Zoom or Ringcentral?
 
They do this every year. I remember hearing about a billion dead English grannies every other summer when I was a kid. It's always an unprecedented heat wave of record temperatures despite being the exact same as the year before.
They do this for winter too. Like, "gee, I remember when we got a LOT more snow and it wasn't as cold!" Hey, bonehead, you were three feet tall in that memory and bundled up in a snowsuit.
 
Imagine how much less exaggerated change our climate would be going through if all the people who whine nonstop about climate change suddenly stopped consuming any resources including oxygen
 
After the media and establishment got fucking addicted and embolded by the Covid Pandemic, they are desperate to keep that rush of power going.
Part of me wants to say this isnt working but I have seen the last three years so Im keeping my expectations of people very low

Edit: Climate change is the ultimate scam. It has been going for nearly a fucking century and people still havent caught on. For all our mockery of religion predicting the end times, we seem to hypocritically ignore when The Science does it (and it does way more than the former). And when their predictions are wrong, they just shrug and say "oh well, I guess we were off, there is always next time!"

Hence and repeat until society completely bought this
 
The British say this every year. There are bumfuck Slavic villages where most people have window unit ACs or those Mitsubishi through the wall ACs.

The British are lagging behind people in the fucking Balkans. They’re paying for NHS breast implants and experimental genital surgeries while the elderly to slow cook to death in their apartments. Surely they could break off a chunk of their welfare state revenue and launch a subsidized AC unit initiative. Even one window unit per house would help people. And they have the audacity to call Americans uncivilized.
 
@Gottahavemysips: El Comandante is willing to believe that the world is warming, but the world has been warmer than now in the past and it didn't have all this batshit insane weather. I'm more on the side of blaming human pollution, after all there are literally little beads of plastic in the blood of most humans living now, and fish off the coast of California are inedible because they're full of fabric fibers from washing machine runoff and mercury residue from 19th century gold mines, and I should mention shit like male fish with eggs in their testes due to water full of female hormones pissed out by women on The Pill. (That's why I'm willing to think that, yeah, transgenderism may be a thing with a small part of the human population, but 97% or so is still autists wanting to be popular by attention whoring.)

Of course the gorillionaires who are pushing climate doomerism don't want to give up their cushy lives even though most of the pollution is caused by the top 1% and their over the top lives of 30k sq ft mansions, Rolls Royce Cullinans that are "bespoke" (aka customized to their personal specs), and Gulfstream VI private jets with the requisite bespokeness. If they would live like the rest of us live now, never mind Agenda 21 and such, pollution would go way down. Why the fuck can't they have their stupid climate summits over Zoom or Ringcentral?
The thing is I don't know that the weather is that crazy compared to normal or if we're just getting better at catching things than we used to. In the US we've seen a decline and flat out lack of EF5 strength tornadoes over the last decade. We're constantly told it's getting crazier, but if you start digging into the records that doesn't quite seem to be the case. I'd be willing to bet a lot of it has to do with the Ocean's oscillation cycles and how they match up, since I think the pacific is on a 40 year cycle and the Atlantic is on a 60 year cycle. In fact, the Atlantic has been on the warming part of it's cycle since the end of the 70s and should be tipping into the cooling part soon.
 
The British say this every year. There are bumfuck Slavic villages where most people have window unit ACs or those Mitsubishi through the wall ACs.

The British are lagging behind people in the fucking Balkans. They’re paying for NHS breast implants and experimental genital surgeries while the elderly to slow cook to death in their apartments. Surely they could break off a chunk of their welfare state revenue and launch a subsidized AC unit initiative. Even one window unit per house would help people. And they have the audacity to call Americans uncivilized.
I'm a Balkanigger living in a village and I have central AC. My dad has a window unit in his house and he's also a Balkanigger peasant. Brits show themselves to be subhumans once again.

Also, temperature scares like this have been common in Yuropean media for about a decade and they bank on the cattle not remembering that Summer is supposed to be hot and banking on them not remembering what Summer was like a year, if not years, before. Given how well they've gotten the cattle to vaxx themselves in Yurop I guess it works. But if you're an outdoorsy type like I am and keep a weather journal you'll see that it's really nothing out of the ordinary. Until Saturday temperatures where I am will be 36 degrees (97 for my burger munching friends) which isn't out of the ordinary for July. This year the heatwave is running a week late, not to mention that last year the worst heatwave in my country was in late August of all times where we had 36-38 degrees for a week straight.
 
Pain in my sweaty balls in NJ. Newark 40 miles east should reach 100.

View attachment 3508957

Either the yearly summer heat wave or.....

The Reptilians are terraforming the planet for their takeover.

We got the same in Philly. I just gotta wait it out until soothing icy winter comes in.

I hate these articles that tell us to eat more plants. Look at all the vegan offerings that are just sodium filled soy cakes. I don't want that junk so I end up getting an omelet with chicken. I'm eating a chicken's lifecycle because you can't offer me some real vegan cuisine. I gotta wait until I get home to get anything decent and plant based that isn't a sodium and additive bomb.
 
Back