You seem to get really mad when someone doesn't really care about your disdain, to the point where you reply to them over the course of more than a day in the hopes that THIS TIME! you'll really get to them. You're down here in the mud with papa rich evans apologist, friend, and I look forward to you trying to deny it.
I think it results in people being negative about his content over shit that isn't just oversensitive pearl-clutching from the BASED! purity brigade. Like
this post, or
this one,
both of which I know you didn't read. If you call his content stale, boring, uninspired, shit, unfunny, etc, I mean - sure, lot of that's true.
But you're doing the equivalent of complaining that you were trying to watch late night talk shows, and Colbert called republicans woman-haters. Too bad you've literally got to keep watching Colbert, even though you can't stand the political bent he's had and displayed for the last 17 years.
What a fanciful, weird world you've started living in since your first zinger didn't get the mean, offensive libtard to meekly quiet down and leave. But then, you don't sound like you interact with people outside your bubble often, so I guess it makes sense for you to keep inventing things I'm saying.
If Jontron interrupts a video to tell you for five minutes that you should vote for Bernie, if Internet Historian interrupts a video to tell you for five minutes to vote for Trump, if Limit Breakers had a break to tell me how important voting was... yes, those would make sense as complaints. Because it's a huge break from what their brand is.
You're complaining that Jeremy Hambeast talks about how he likes Trump and doesn't like woke shit. You're complaining that Stephen Crowder takes potshots at liberals in his standup. You're complaining that Null interrupts a stream about fat women to talk about how he doesn't like niggers and how the US is a dead nigger country. What were you expecting?