Law Legal Bombshell: Leftist Judges Rule Alex Jones May Not Discuss 1st Amendment, Say He Is Innocent, or Claim Court Case Rigged

Link / Archive

Effectively, the judges have ruled that Alex Jones is guilty before proven guilty and will instruct the jury to determine just how guilty he is.

In an unprecedented assault on due process and the rule of law, both a Texas and Connecticut judge have ruled that Alex Jones may not discuss the First Amendment, defend his innocence, or point out the rigged elements of the upcoming Sandy Hook defamation case against him.

Here is a limited breakdown of some of the most egregious constitutional violations of due process and the First Amendment as explained by a third-party legal adviser:
You have been denied your fundamental, constitutional due process right to present a defense in Texas or Connecticut. Both Judge Guerra Gamble (D) (Texas) and Judge Barbara Bellis have stripped you of your First Amendment rights for allegedly failing to provide enough discovery. Neither judge can deny that you responded to discovery, they just ruled that it was insufficient. The effect of these rulings, incredibly, is that you have been found guilty by two judges who never even held trials or heard any evidence.
Additionally, “since finding you guilty without listening to any evidence, Judge Guerra Gamble has repeatedly sanctioned you monetarily for exactly the same thing she has already sanctioned you for by declaring you guilty,” the adviser stated.

Judge Guerra Gamble has largely agreed that Alex Jones’ lawyers should be gagged during Alex Jones’ trial from:
  • Invoking the First Amendment in Alex Jones’ defense:
firstamend2947627890-1024x355.jpg
  • Arguing that the trial is in any way unfair or unjust to Alex Jones:
beoaigjrgiohlh-1024x577.jpg
  • Arguing his innocence because Jones failed to produce documents that don’t exist:
networth3947286789-1024x247.jpg
Alex Jones has also been prohibited from asserting that the plaintiffs have become public figures by appearing on television, testifying before Congress, giving TED talks, and publishing books.

Finally, the Texas judge has determined that the “jury shall be instructed” to find any arguments about Infowars’ journalistic practices to be “established in favor of the Plaintiff.”

“Even the plaintiffs recognized this order was completely illegal and took the unprecedented step of asking the court to rescind it after you filed an appeal,” the legal adviser noted.

Jury selection for the defamation case begins on July, 25th 2022.

In constitutional republics, the accused are innocent until proven guilty.

In tyrannies, the accused are proclaimed guilty until proven guilty.

This is it America; due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, along with the First Amendment are being systematically destroyed by the judiciary to crush the political establishment’s opposition.

Read the ruling below:
https://www.scribd.com/document/583374710/2022-04-13-Pltf-Motions-in-Limine#download&from_embed
 
I'm angry.
I've had enough of these people.
They're a bunch of christian-murdering scum running giant death factories, eating babies alive and selling their bodyparts.
What more do you need to know about these people?
I go out and face these scum.
They literally crawl out from under rocks, they have green-looking skin, and they run around screaming, 'We love Satan, we wanna eat babies.'
I have them on video.

This but unironically.
 
Doesn't exist? You retards really think he could not have produced revenue data of the past years to plot together to show if he really got a boost from his schizo rambling about the shooting? Couldn't get ad revenue data on his stuff related to the event? Are you really so stupid?
He produced EVERYTHING possible, thousands of Pages. its a shame trial,
 
"You're a retard" and you thought there was even a miniscule chance I'd take that seriously? Nothing else to elaborate on, doctor?
70% of human communication is non-verbal. You have been unable to receive this non-verbal information for the entirety of your life. You were essentially born deaf to 70% of all interpersonal communication and this fundamental deficit has left you to develop a map of reality that is based on false pretenses. You have come to the conclusions you have based on incomplete information and wrong assumptions. I don't mean that you have Down's Syndrome or any other sort of chromosomal anomaly that would make you a simpleton. What's wrong with you is just as root-deep as that, though. It has been there since infancy, and has inhibited your growth in ways that you can't comprehend. The very fact that you reduced what I was saying to "you're a retard" is evidence of that incomprehensibility. You are living a lie. That lie is that you are a whole and complete person. You aren't. Until you come to grips with that fact, that fundamental fact that there is something missing, then you will never advance beyond the state you are currently in. You will be stuck for as long as it takes to accept that fact and to reevaluate your relationships.
 
Wormy, I would like you to consider something real quick and see if you can understand the implications. You are mentally retarded. You quite literally have a developmental disability that impairs your understanding of the world. Because of this, you believe things that aren't real and don't understand things that are real. Your brain is doing its best to fill in the gaps, but you are fundamentally missing information which other people have ready access to. As a result, you live in a fantasy world of your own, completely detached from what everyone else understands to be true. I know that you won't understand this, what I'm trying to impart, and you will automatically dismiss it, and me, but I feel I need to at least try one time. Your defenses are just going to swat it aside, I'm sure.
Development disability implies he ever stood a chance
 
70% of human communication is non-verbal. You have been unable to receive this non-verbal information for the entirety of your life. You were essentially born deaf to 70% of all interpersonal communication and this fundamental deficit has left you to develop a map of reality that is based on false pretenses. You have come to the conclusions you have based on incomplete information and wrong assumptions. I don't mean that you have Down's Syndrome or any other sort of chromosomal anomaly that would make you a simpleton. What's wrong with you is just as root-deep as that, though. It has been there since infancy, and has inhibited your growth in ways that you can't comprehend. The very fact that you reduced what I was saying to "you're a retard" is evidence of that incomprehensibility. You are living a lie. That lie is that you are a whole and complete person. You aren't. Until you come to grips with that fact, that fundamental fact that there is something missing, then you will never advance beyond the state you are currently in. You will be stuck for as long as it takes to accept that fact and to reevaluate your relationships.
This post just proved you are both retarded
 
In an unprecedented assault on due process and the rule of law, both a Texas and Connecticut judge have ruled that Alex Jones may not discuss the First Amendment, defend his innocence, or point out the rigged elements of the upcoming Sandy Hook defamation case against him.
I don't think the judge for this case really understand the Bill of Rights well. Since the judge is a Democrat, I would expect them to not understand the Constitution at all.
 
Hang on, hang on, hang on.
The document in the OP article is the plaintiff's motion, NOT the Judges ruling on the motion. You can tell from the just the last page. In the article it says even the plaintiff's asked the judge to rescind the ruling. Wait, what? The one they just themselves motioned for? Huh? Uh, that doesn't sound right. Someone has screwed up their reporting. I can't seem to find the actual ruling.
I am not trying to defend the ruling offhand, I just want to read the damn thing and see what it actually says.
 
Good. Fucker's called for people to get killed on account of them supposedly being werewolves and vampires, NOW he whines for due process? Fuck him. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
Anyone who openly advocates for removing free speech and due process rights from others should have them taken away from them. Get fucked, you authoritarian faggot.
 
Dude ignored court orders and received a default judgment because he wasn't providing any documents or claims. There's no violation of due process or infringement of the First Amendment (although there is a debate to be had over whether or not there should be defamation laws in the first place...) but like, you don't participate in the process, get bent over by the courts and are surprised by this?

Like, the system doesn't grind to a halt because you choose to not participate in it, lmao.
 
It's not legal and they violated the Constitution, Alex Jones could appeal this to higher courts and potentially reach the Supreme Court.
Which I think is the actual goal. A sort of, you'll win this battle but you'll own and be nothing by the time we are done., sort of deal.

PS

I looked at the document in full, I think they are legit documents but taken out of context as another pointed out. The only people that seem to have run an article mentioning the scribd documents have Q-vibes going on. One of them has even deleted their initial article.
 
Last edited:
Back