Grand Jury speculation thread

What will the next legal development be?

  • Grand Jury declares Chris fit for trial

    Votes: 458 30.3%
  • Grand Jury declares Chris a brokebrain and unfit for trial

    Votes: 203 13.4%
  • CONTINUANCE!

    Votes: 220 14.6%
  • Plea deal

    Votes: 122 8.1%
  • The US collapses, Chris escapes from jail and becomes a cult-leader

    Votes: 208 13.8%
  • The Merge occurs

    Votes: 301 19.9%

  • Total voters
    1,512
Status
Not open for further replies.
So Wolfkiller posted on reddit first before posting here.
Yeah, with all the people watching this topic across several sites, it's a little suspicious that the only two references happen to be within 2 minutes of each other.

To any legal Kiwis, does getting this information from the purported source even make any sense? I would have guessed that they'd give an answer a little like when Chris went to the hospital: "he's outside of our system now but we don't specify exactly to where"

Edit: my apologies to Wolfkiller, what a scoop!
 
Last edited:
Let's say this moves forward to a grand jury. Heilberg's only job was to convince the judge to let Chris off (as usual). I don't know if his magic can work in a grand jury with a client like Chris.
In most states a grand jury is just the prosecutor presenting whatever evidence he wants to the jury. Even evidence that might be inadmissible. The goal is just to see if there is a possibility the state can prove it's case in a trial. The defendant isn't even there and no defense is put on. Hence the saying "you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich."

Edit* to clarify, in some states a defendant or defense attorney may be present, it depends, but they would basically just be there to watch.
 

Attachments

  • Opera Snapshot_2022-07-28_112503_vinelink.vineapps.com.png
    Opera Snapshot_2022-07-28_112503_vinelink.vineapps.com.png
    43.3 KB · Views: 204
Unless the police found the used condoms in a search? Didn't they search Chris' car and 14BC?
Wouldn't him flushing them with fanta destroy the evidence?
Yeah, with all the people watching this topic across several sites, it's a little suspicious that the only two references happen to be within 2 minutes of each other.

To any legal Kiwis, does getting this information from the purported source even make any sense? I would have guessed that they'd give an answer a little like when Chris went to the hospital: "he's outside of our system now but we don't specify exactly to where"
It's public info, they don't have to tell the defendant they're going to grand jury but they can't hide it either, they simply haven't entered it into the system yet.
 
Just for the sake of entertaining the notion an entire lifetime of tard teflon karma is paying out the most extreme game of kick the autistic of all time...how on Earth could Chris's case end up in front of a grand jury?

I mean, I have no legal expertise but I was under the impression the only possible moves that could have been made were either to force Chris to make a plea deal as guilty, or do a hail mary and go for insanity? Seems to me this would have been an open and shut deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back