US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Is Pelosi gets shot down.. mind you, I don't think that will happen, I think her plane gets turned around the minute China starts firing, but if she gets shot down.. the laugh.. the laugh will be glorious.
But also imagine the chance it lead to dying in a war over Nancy Pelosi.
 
Especially since no one but the most deranged Democrats are going to give a fuck enough about Pelosi to demand war over her death. And the Biden admin has proven time and again it lacks the balls to do anything about China. There won't even be sanctions.

It would more or less be a consequence free kill for the Chinese.
Thing is, blowing up the fossil's plane is the perfect casus belli for conflict with china, easier to justify than russia's war with ukraine, specially for the deranged dems and warhawks that make up a good chunk of the gov, i don't understand why would they approve of this so bad, what do they gain with pushing the top 2 economies closer to direct armed confrontation? This is exactly why the army is failling to recruit new meat, zoomers don't want to die for Israel/ukraine/taiwan. (And because they're fat/diabetic)
 
It's multidimensional, or if you prefer, transdimensional. This individual has transitioned from the gender binary to the gender spectrum--which is not a linear spectrum like visible light, but is in fact a plane or a perhaps a space or hyperspace--and on that spectrum has staked out a nonbinary position.

Simple. When you trade in your capacity for developing a genuine personality, they give you an identity test. When filling it out, skip the "I wanna be special." box and the "I wanna be SUPER special!" box and check the "I WANNA BE SUPER AMAZO SPECIAL!" box.
Fuck rocket science is easier to comprehend than this gender and sex shit.
 
>Let in millions of Mexican immigrants for slave labor
>Expect them to vote forever democrat for this favor like niggers do
>Uh oh, turns out the Mexicans love family, tradition and have a seething hatred for faggots
>They start voting Republican

Democrats:
View attachment 3542256
(archive)
If immigrants, legal or otherwise, had incentive to vote Republican, you'd not only see a border wall, but a border minefield, border machine gun nests, and even a border moat with border sharks that have border laser beams attached to their heads.
The fuck is an AR 15 round? They do not even try do they? They are just counting on the people watching to be so mentally deficient that they just eat the mashed peas and do not think about it.
That stuff is meant for CNN watchers not for people who look elsewhere for "information." I'd like to believe that it's not likely to pass the Senate but betrayal is in the lifeblood of a politician.

Edit: Border Moat
 
Last edited:
Thing is, blowing up the fossil's plane is the perfect casus belli for conflict with china, easier to justify than russia's war with ukraine, specially for the deranged dems and warhawks that make up a good chunk of the gov, i don't understand why would they approve of this so bad, what do they gain with pushing the top 2 economies closer to direct armed confrontation? This is exactly why the army is failling to recruit new meat, zoomers don't want to die for Israel/ukraine/taiwan. (And because they're fat/diabetic)
If she's going to get assassinated, they'd make it look like it was a Taiwan nationalist that did it and diplomatically isolate Taiwan from the US.
 
>Let in millions of Mexican immigrants for slave labor
>Expect them to vote forever democrat for this favor like niggers do
>Uh oh, turns out the Mexicans love family, tradition and have a seething hatred for faggots
>They start voting Republican

Democrats:
View attachment 3542256
(archive)
Not a surprise considering Obama ended Wet Foot Fry Foot a week before Trump took office. :story:
 
I can't decide if this is good for calling their stupidity, or giving them more ideas.

Then again, the point he's making is that "weapons of war" include basically every firearm ever.

View attachment 3542860
Every kind of firearm that ever existed has been in use by some nation's military at some point in time.

Hell, those primitive matchlock muskets the Spanish brought to the Aztec Empire, while prone to rainy weather and damp powder, among other things-were in use for quite some time themselves.

Of course, none of that shit matters to the social and political elite, they just want us to suck their cocks.
View attachment 3542869
"This bill will not lead to confiscation of firearms."
*Laughs in Canadian*
If she's going to get assassinated, they'd make it look like it was a Taiwan nationalist that did it and diplomatically isolate Taiwan from the US.
And political junkies like to tell us that there's no such thing as a "false flag attack"

...unless Moscow is involved somehow.
 
And political junkies like to tell us that there's no such thing as a "false flag attack"

...unless Moscow is involved somehow.
Which is why I don't think it's likely (although deserved). China wouldn't take out one of their own lobbyists and make the administration they support--and benefit from its blunders--as a step towards taking out Taiwan. Taking out Abe made more sense than this.
 
Is Pelosi gets shot down.. mind you, I don't think that will happen, I think her plane gets turned around the minute China starts firing, but if she gets shot down.. the laugh.. the laugh will be glorious.

Be a damn shaaaaaaaaaaaaame if that plane wended its way near Kamchatka and Sakhalin. By accident. Be a reeeeeal damn shame...
 
...wait, what?

View attachment 3542966

If Dems get cucked by their own party on this, I will dance a jig.

:optimistic:
"What do you mean masses of your voters bought firearms over the last two years in fear of increasing violence? Once we get the guns off the street, the right wing death squads won't be able to threaten them. Why are you laughing? What do you mean 'They're not why they bought the guns'? Who else would be burning down their neighborhoods?"

If this is a case of reap what you sow, I hope its a bountiful harvest.
 
I’d like to see some evidence that this is uniquely racial, and not an obvious function of wealth. Are there numbers showing that upper-middle-class Pedro’s and Jamal’s are still predominantly having massive families with 5+ children? Or are they, like John and Chang, mostly limiting themselves to 1-3? In my personal anecdotal experience they certainly are not, but if the numbers say otherwise I’m willing to believe them.
The further up the income ladder you go, the fewer kids you tend to pump out. Mormons might be an exception with the Quiverful thing and all, but don't quote me on that. Also, poorer people do tend to have tighter-knit family/neighborhood connections out of sheer necessity, whereas your upper-middle-class Pedro and Jamal can pay for child care or, if they're really rolling in the dough, hire a nanny.

At least screencap the "talk" section as well so we can see what the autists are arguing about, which IMO is more entertaining
View attachment 3541939
Anyone else have their college professors adamantly tell you that Wikipedia was NOT a legitimate source? Mine did. And that was eons ago.
 
I can't decide if this is good for calling their stupidity, or giving them more ideas.

Then again, the point he's making is that "weapons of war" include basically every firearm ever.

View attachment 3542860
Except the shotgun, because it's banned by the geneva convention.

Which is why they wanted to ban the purchase of it by Americans back in the day, if I understand the twitter hot takes correctly...

... because it wasn't a weapon of war, and thus Americans had no right to it.

At some point it becomes clear no amount of spackle can cover up that they just want the American citizenry disarmed because they plan to do something to us we'd kill them for trying if we could.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back