US Instances of Voter Fraud (Megathread?) - Probably a good idea to have a thread on this given how often it's discussed and will continue to be discussed even after November.

Is mail in voting autistic?

  • Total voters
    92
  • Poll closed .
New election integrity fears: Georgia county ballot machines off by thousands when hand counted

The first place candidate dropped to third place after the hand count

justthenews.com

New election integrity fears: Georgia county ballot machines off by thousands when hand counted

The first place candidate dropped to third place after the hand count
justthenews.com justthenews.com

The Democratic primary for a Georgia county has been called into question after a hand count revealed the voting machines were off by thousands of ballots.

Marshall Orson, a Democratic DeKalb County school board member running for the county commission, asked the local elections board on Thursday to not certify the results as scheduled on Friday due to "numerous issues" with the race.

Orson asked for an "independent review" and a formal recount of the election in his letter to the board, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.

"There is no rational basis for believing that there are not continuing issues with the results and the results should not be certified with the continuing existence of multiple substantive issues and concerns," Orson wrote. "Doing so would pose a substantial risk not only to the confidence the public will have in the overall election results from this race but could extend to the entire primary as well as the general election."

The initial Democratic primary results showed Orson winning for commission District 2 with Lauren Alexander in second place and Michelle Long Spears in third. This would have put Orson against Alexander in a runoff election.

However, Spears noticed that the results showed she received zero votes at most election precincts.

The secretary of state's office admitted late last month to making several programing mistakes in the ballot equipment that affected the final tally.

There was an attempted re-scan of the ballots in District 2, but ultimately a hand count was conducted, concluding around midnight on Memorial Day.

On Wednesday evening, the results of the hand count were released, showing former last-place candidate Spears now in first place and headed to a June 21 runoff against Alexander. Former first place candidate Orson was pushed to third place.

Spears gained about 2,600 votes from the original tally, while Alexander gained a few hundred, the Journal-Constitution reported. Orson lost about 1,600 votes from the original results.

The Dekalb County elections board is scheduled to certify the election results Friday afternoon.

Georgia has been the site of numerous election controversies following the 2020 presidential election.

For example, a complaint filed in April to the Georgia State Election Board claims that more than 300,000 ballots in the 2020 election were unreliably recorded in state's largest county of Fulton.

-----

But don't worry guys, I'm sure it's the first time this has ever happened in Georgia. And we all know that their 2020 count was the MOST SECURE ELECTION EVAR which is why they keep fighting to hide all the evidence.

Also... programming "mistakes" LOL
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Simp Biscuit, Backpack Knight, Master Troll and 16 others
ForTheHoard said:
Not necessarily, but there's little to no technical excuse for significant delays in an era of digital vote counting. I would also assume that fraud would be much more difficult or near impossible to execute without a significant delay in the counting process.

It's not a smoking gun, but it does present cause for investigation amd concern.
Click to expand...

The only execution required is for every government employee that perpetrated a failure in their duties to the people. I am 100% serious when I say that every single case of active fraud or passive failure in the election system be punished by the death penalty. You 'accidently' fail to count all votes in a timely manner? Hemp fandango. You 'accidently mis-program' the machines to count wrong? Trapdoor tango. You send out all the vote monitors and begin to scan votes without proper chain of custody? Gallows gavotte. You stuff a drop box with handfulls of harvested ballots? Mid-air minuet. Fail to properly preserve all records for inspections and audits? Spine-shatter Swing.

I'm just a simple man that enjoys transparent government and seeing justice done in the sunlight with a solid rope and short drop.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Core Theorist, Tim the Tranny, Backpack Knight and 19 others
JohnDoe said:
The only execution required is for every government employee that perpetrated a failure in their duties to the people. I am 100% serious when I say that every single case of active fraud or passive failure in the election system be punished by the death penalty. You 'accidently' fail to count all votes in a timely manner? Hemp fandango. You 'accidently mis-program' the machines to count wrong? Trapdoor tango. You send out all the vote monitors and begin to scan votes without proper chain of custody? Gallows gavotte. You stuff a drop box with handfulls of harvested ballots? Mid-air minuet. Fail to properly preserve all records for inspections and audits? Spine-shatter Swing.

I'm just a simple man that enjoys transparent government and seeing justice done in the sunlight with a solid rope and short drop.
Click to expand...
I'd rather have a firing squad on those government members who have spoken out against the NRA. But instead of doing the execution on time, leave the rifles pointed at the prisoner for 5 minutes, with nobody operating them. Then, and only then, can you wax poetic about guns not killing people.

After which you Swiss Cheesify the motherfucker in Minecraft Call Of Duty
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Backpack Knight, Halmaz, I Love Huge Long Chode and 4 others
Convicted Arizona ballot trafficker Guillermina Fuentes recently pled guilty to her charges from 2020, only as a result of evidence presented in the movie "2000 Mules" with similar convictions for others likely to follow.

azgf.png


A columnist at the Washington Compost copes and seethes:

azgf.jpg


The image above was captioned:
"A supporter expresses a baseless claim at a rally by former president Donald Trump in January in Florence, Ariz."

He goes on to make baseless™ claims about "2000 Mules" and pretty much the fact that they caught this one person TOTALLY DEBOONKS any other allegations across the country which is why they hide all the evidence?


 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Simp Biscuit, Backpack Knight, WhiskeyJack and 9 others
silverstacks said:
Convicted Arizona ballot trafficker Guillermina Fuentes recently pled guilty to her charges from 2020, only as a result of evidence presented in the movie "2000 Mules" with similar convictions for others likely to follow.

View attachment 3388291

A columnist at the Washington Compost copes and seethes:

View attachment 3388298

The image above was captioned:
"A supporter expresses a baseless claim at a rally by former president Donald Trump in January in Florence, Ariz."

He goes on to make baseless™ claims about "2000 Mules" and pretty much the fact that they caught this one person TOTALLY DEBOONKS any other allegations across the country which is why they hide all the evidence?


Click to expand...
"Small-city voter fraud case" yeah right. Just wait until there'll be much more "small-cities voter fraud cases".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: AnonAutismo, Yamma Damma, Rainbow Idiot and 3 others
silverstacks said:
Convicted Arizona ballot trafficker Guillermina Fuentes recently pled guilty to her charges from 2020, only as a result of evidence presented in the movie "2000 Mules" with similar convictions for others likely to follow.

View attachment 3388291

A columnist at the Washington Compost copes and seethes:

View attachment 3388298

The image above was captioned:
"A supporter expresses a baseless claim at a rally by former president Donald Trump in January in Florence, Ariz."

He goes on to make baseless™ claims about "2000 Mules" and pretty much the fact that they caught this one person TOTALLY DEBOONKS any other allegations across the country which is why they hide all the evidence?


Click to expand...
So, Dinesh's "stupid movie" actually had an impact. Shocker...
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Flaming Insignias, silverstacks and 1 other person
Zuck the Globalist Cuck strikes again in Colorado - You might also remember Tina Peters from earlier posts in this thread... she's the CO election official who got arrested and had feds raid her house, for the "crime" of simply doing her job.


How Did A Zuckerberg Charity Stooge Win A GOP Primary In Colorado?

Pam Anderson won a race with no money and very few visible voters

Emerald Robinson
Jul 1

The story of the GOP primary race for Secretary of State in Colorado gets more interesting the more you investigate the results.

As I noted yesterday, the big news is that an Australian businessman named Mike O’Donnell somehow got 28% of the vote (173,000 citizens voted for him!) even though polling showed he had no support, he raised $4,700 for his campaign, and 139 people were following his campaign on Twitter. The most interaction he got on his 1,300 campaign tweets was 4 “likes” on his June 27th tweet; most of them had zero interaction. He went from being a non-factor in a three-person race to grabbing more than quarter of the total vote.

Mike O’Donnell seems like a very nice guy — but can anyone explain his sudden 28% share of the vote in the most important election integrity race in Colorado? Election officials in Colorado had no explanation. Most of the county clerks in the 17 counties that Mike O’Donnell won had never heard of him. Their reactions ranged from confusion to disbelief.

But, wait, there’s more.

The really big news is that Pam Anderson supposedly won the race with 43% of the vote (266,000 citizens voted for her!) which is an unbelievable result — to say the very least.

It’s truly unbelievable because two months before the primary, Pam Anderson was not just losing to Tina Peters in all the polling and fundraising metrics, but her campaign was broke. She had a $5,665 balance in her campaign coffers. According to liberal site Colorado Pols, “this surprisingly anemic fundraising is just more evidence that [Pam Anderson] is a candidate without a constituency…”

Two days after that assessment, Colorado Pols considered Anderson’s campaign dead-on-arrival and added that: “Peters’ strong performance further underscores Anderson’s weakness in this race, running on a message not just disagreed with but considered treasonous by a majority of Republican voters.”

Furthermore, Tina Peters was the obvious frontrunner in every way:

“In the Republican primary for Colorado Secretary of State, all the momentum now is with Tina Peters. By every available metric, Peters is the frontrunner. Peters dominated the vote at the state assembly, and now holds a commanding lead in fundraising. Peters is getting orders of magnitude more earned media attention. Coverage one might perceive as negative about Peters’ criminal case, at least until June 28th, is not a major liability with GOP primary voters. To the extent they’ve heard of Peters, a large percentage will see her as a hero.”

So where were Pam Anderson’s 266,000 voters hiding all this time before primary day?

They were not hiding on Twitter and Facebook — that’s for sure.

zuckco1.png


The day of the primary, the enthusiasm for Pam Anderson was, shall we say, underwhelming on social media.

zuckco2.png


Does these tweets appear to show the kind of sudden political momentum that turns Pam Anderson from being twenty points behind Tina Peters to beating Tina Peters by 15 points?

You must remember that Tina Peters got 61% of the delegates at Colorado’s Republican Assembly in April. What about Pam Anderson — you ask?

Pam Anderson did not even attend the Republican assembly. She was so unpopular in the Colorado GOP that she was a write-in candidate who only qualified in April. She had to collect 1,000 valid signatures from registered Republicans in each of the state’s eight congressional districts just to get on the ballot. In the 5th Congressional District, Anderson managed only 1,282 valid signatures. Apparently, more than 5,000 of the 17,904 signatures submitted by Anderson were not valid.

In other words, Pam Anderson was not a wildly popular candidate among Republicans.

So how did Pam Anderson suddenly pull off a miraculous 35 point swing on Primary Day two months later with no money and no endorsements?

The only advantage that Pam Anderson had in this race: she’s on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s private election mafia, the “Center For Tech And Civic Life.”

Isn’t it strange that the director of Mark Zuckerberg’s private election charity for Democrats (on temporary leave!) just won the most important election integrity race in Colorado — and a GOP primary no less — as a write-in candidate with a 35 point polling swing with no money and no visible support from Republicans?

One more thing: Colorado uses Dominion Voting Machines.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Simp Biscuit, Backpack Knight, Master Troll and 20 others
I guess this is the most relevant thread for this kind of stuff. Two years in and the cries of legitimacy are still dominating headlines.
1659045903103.png

1659045972285.png
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Corpun and Yamma Damma
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, Flaming Insignias and Synthetic Smug
Heard about this on the radio today. Someone in Washington put up signs around ballot drop boxes (WA is a vote by mail state) that said the drop box was under surveillance. Governor Jaydolph Insler lost his shit about it. This really turns my stomach. Sorry I don't know hot to rip the video.


1659139430615.png

They are REALLY pissed off about this and saying it violates federal and state law.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Backpack Knight, Halmaz, Yamma Damma and 8 others
ForTheHoard said:
Heard about this on the radio today. Someone in Washington put up signs around ballot drop boxes (WA is a vote by mail state) that said the drop box was under surveillance. Governor Jaydolph Insler lost his shit about it. This really turns my stomach. Sorry I don't know hot to rip the video.


View attachment 3543391

They are REALLY pissed off about this and saying it violates federal and state law.
Click to expand...
There is nothing suspicious about that.
 
ForTheHoard said:
Heard about this on the radio today. Someone in Washington put up signs around ballot drop boxes (WA is a vote by mail state) that said the drop box was under surveillance. Governor Jaydolph Insler lost his shit about it. This really turns my stomach. Sorry I don't know hot to rip the video.


View attachment 3543391

They are REALLY pissed off about this and saying it violates federal and state law.
Click to expand...
"Oopsie Doopsey! The camera feed died the moment fake votes were dumped in we began to true and honestly count the ballots! HOW SAD!"
 
Okay, this is weird. Tina Peters actually managed to get a recount of the election they just rigged against her (see my last post above), but in order to do so she had to pay a $256,000 fee.

My question is WHY bother with this at all? Bear in mind that it's only a "recount" rather than an audit, and also they denied her request for a hand recount because Colorado law conveniently mandates that it be done with machines instead of actual people. I guess her plan goes something like:

1. Hand over a quarter-mil $ to the corrupt Colorado SOS office
2. Recount "ballots" with the same rigged machines as before
3. ???
4. PROFIT

Article with more details from leftist source below, if anyone thinks they can make more sense of it...
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Backpack Knight, Thomas Cat, Flaming Insignias and 4 others
silverstacks said:
1. Hand over a quarter-mil $ to the corrupt Colorado SOS office
2. Recount "ballots" with the same rigged machines as before
3. ???
4. PROFIT
Click to expand...
It seems like she needs to go through the motions in order to have standing for a judicial appeal. Not sure what the judges look like in Colorado but maybe the GOP is hoping to overturn some of these laws? Might be a Hail Mary.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: silverstacks
New Evidence Shows Crooked Electronic Voter Registration System ERIC Is Politically Compromised...STUNNING 104% of Voting Aged Population In MI Is Registered To Vote!

100percentfedup.com

New Evidence Shows Crooked Electronic Voter Registration System ERIC Is Politically Compromised...STUNNING 104% of Voting Aged Population In MI Is Registered To Vote!

For months, grassroots groups have sounded the alarm about ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center), a system used in 31 states […]
100percentfedup.com 100percentfedup.com

For months, grassroots groups have sounded the alarm about ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center), a system used in 31 states that was originally funded by the Soros Open Society, and how it is bloating the voter rolls.

ericstates.jpg


Now, evidence indicates ERIC is politically compromised.

Meanwhile, the clock ticks down to the 2022 election, even as the number of Michigan’s registered voters climbs dangerously—and impossibly—to 104% of its Voting Aged Population (VAP).

ericmichigan.jpeg


On Monday, MI Rep. Ann Bollin (R), Chair of House Elections & Ethics Committee, announced, “We have initiated a deeper dive on our end with our legal counsel as we prep for an oversight hearing or letter of inquiry.”

MI Rep. Ann Bollin’s announcement came in response to Michigan Fair Elections’ urgent warning that Verity Vote had exposed the ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center)—the organization chartered with cleaning the state’s voter rolls—as politically compromised. The Representative’s announcement followed months of citizen research and a steady rain of alarming evidence surrounding ERIC, and it signaled the ship of state may be turning. Meanwhile, the countdown clock ticks toward November’s mid-term elections, and ERIC continues to insert bias and bloat into the state’s qualified voter files. Legislative leaders are left with scant options to avert a looming election integrity crisis.

People have long known that ERIC obstructs transparency. It registers noncitizens, enjoys illegal access to Michigan residents’ personal information, and fails to remove moved, ineligible and dead voters. But on June 17, Verityvote.us, led by citizen investigator Heather Honey, demonstrated that the left-wing organization had crossed a red line.

“The primary effect of ERIC is to grow the voter rolls by converting eligible-but-unregistered (EBU) persons into registered voters. States divulge to ERIC personally identifying information of unregistered residents, including people who have declined to register for privacy reasons. FOIAs reveal that ERIC is sharing EBU records with Zuckerberg-funded CEIR.”

In other words, ERIC not only receives residents’ legally protected information, but it also transfers that data to a fellow leftist organization. And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Wait until you read what the Center for Electronic Innovation does with the juicy information.

(CONTINUED AT LINK)
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Simp Biscuit, Potatoherder, Flaming Insignias and 7 others
silverstacks said:
New Evidence Shows Crooked Electronic Voter Registration System ERIC Is Politically Compromised...STUNNING 104% of Voting Aged Population In MI Is Registered To Vote!

100percentfedup.com

New Evidence Shows Crooked Electronic Voter Registration System ERIC Is Politically Compromised...STUNNING 104% of Voting Aged Population In MI Is Registered To Vote!

For months, grassroots groups have sounded the alarm about ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center), a system used in 31 states […]
100percentfedup.com 100percentfedup.com

For months, grassroots groups have sounded the alarm about ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center), a system used in 31 states that was originally funded by the Soros Open Society, and how it is bloating the voter rolls.

View attachment 3621922

Now, evidence indicates ERIC is politically compromised.

Meanwhile, the clock ticks down to the 2022 election, even as the number of Michigan’s registered voters climbs dangerously—and impossibly—to 104% of its Voting Aged Population (VAP).

View attachment 3621930

On Monday, MI Rep. Ann Bollin (R), Chair of House Elections & Ethics Committee, announced, “We have initiated a deeper dive on our end with our legal counsel as we prep for an oversight hearing or letter of inquiry.”

MI Rep. Ann Bollin’s announcement came in response to Michigan Fair Elections’ urgent warning that Verity Vote had exposed the ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center)—the organization chartered with cleaning the state’s voter rolls—as politically compromised. The Representative’s announcement followed months of citizen research and a steady rain of alarming evidence surrounding ERIC, and it signaled the ship of state may be turning. Meanwhile, the countdown clock ticks toward November’s mid-term elections, and ERIC continues to insert bias and bloat into the state’s qualified voter files. Legislative leaders are left with scant options to avert a looming election integrity crisis.

People have long known that ERIC obstructs transparency. It registers noncitizens, enjoys illegal access to Michigan residents’ personal information, and fails to remove moved, ineligible and dead voters. But on June 17, Verityvote.us, led by citizen investigator Heather Honey, demonstrated that the left-wing organization had crossed a red line.

“The primary effect of ERIC is to grow the voter rolls by converting eligible-but-unregistered (EBU) persons into registered voters. States divulge to ERIC personally identifying information of unregistered residents, including people who have declined to register for privacy reasons. FOIAs reveal that ERIC is sharing EBU records with Zuckerberg-funded CEIR.”

In other words, ERIC not only receives residents’ legally protected information, but it also transfers that data to a fellow leftist organization. And that’s the tip of the iceberg. Wait until you read what the Center for Electronic Innovation does with the juicy information.

(CONTINUED AT LINK)
Click to expand...
I'm actually shocked that it's not being used in California.

Probably because they likely have something much worse.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: silverstacks
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back