- Joined
- Aug 23, 2014
Seems to be a surge of oldfags crowding in to see the carnage.
Will the details of the trial be public knowledge?
Will the details of the trial be public knowledge?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're thinking an Alford plea, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alford_pleaChris has a tard shield, like during the Michael Snyder case where he had to plead out. I think his plea in that case didn't require him to say that he was guilty, but he had some outburst that Snyder "DIDN'T DESERVE ONE RED CENT!", and everyone in the court just ignored him.
So I don't think he would have torpedoed a plea deal this time, just it likely involves pleading guilty to a felony charge so they can slap him with a couple years probation.
Himself when he has a stress induced heart attack.It doesn't matter. Chris will get out. He will kill again.
He will have forseen this, of course.Himself when he has a stress induced heart attack.
In another universe, the Chris Chan who managed to father a daughter named Crystal is facing those same charges but correct.Boy oh boy. I sure hope nobody pulls up Chris' paperwork where he's held. That clerical error 'INCEST W/OWN CHILD' is going to cost him his life if an inmate ever manages to get to him.
From the looks ofit CWC will have to take the public defender. This case is a complete circus.
for the last time Just because Chris is being charged with a felony for once in his life, doesn't mean he's going to big boy prison for five or even three years. Best Case scenario: time served minimum of a year and slapped with sor and felony charges which gives him a felony record. worst case scenario suspended sentence of 2 to 3 years with a year served. So the same only arguably worse since hell also be on strict probation, which if he violates or fucks up even once then it's off to prison with him.
The prosecution has been unbelievably kind to Chris and gave him a whole fucking year to get his shit together and take a sweetheart plea deal.
Boy oh boy. I sure hope nobody pulls up Chris' paperwork where he's held. That clerical error 'INCEST W/OWN CHILD' is going to cost him his life if an inmate ever manages to get to him.
Not necessary.Boy oh boy. I sure hope nobody pulls up Chris' paperwork where he's held. That clerical error 'INCEST W/OWN CHILD' is going to cost him his life if an inmate ever manages to get to him.
Maybe someone already answered you, but IIRC Heilberg is doing this because lawyers need to do a certain amount of public defender work every year and so he took on Chris's case.l to meet that requirement. It isn't as if he can charge Chris for his time or anything. The public defender pay is the public defender pay. Otherwise everyone would do it.
If I'm reading p. 36 correctly it's not a lot at all. Only $445 maximum in fees for a felony resolved in district court with a billing rate of $90/hr.
However these sound like fees for cut-and-dry cases where it's in and out and they make more on volume, not something like Chris' case where it's been drawn out and involved multiple additional steps. Heilberg might be able to get more reimbursement if there's a lot of work involved on his part but I think he's doing this mostly pro bono.
As Chris would have been. This was kind.Drawing a case out only helps the defendant if they are out on the streets.
They tried to. Chris wouldn’t let them.Also, if they were "unbelievably kind" then they would have left the charge as a misdemeanor.
What are you talking about? They opposed bail because Chris has a history of poor behavior with a risk of returning to 14 bt. As well as a huge possible danger because of weens.It's actually the opposite. They stringently opposed bail, which means that the various continuances, etc in this case worked against Chris' favor. Drawing a case out only helps the defendant if they are out on the streets. Otherwise, where's the benefit in just sitting in jail for a year? Yeah, if he was out enjoying his freedom then all these delays would be great. But that's not the case.
Also, if they were "unbelievably kind" then they would have left the charge as a misdemeanor. This charge is called a "wobbler", which means that it could be a misdemeanor or a felony in the discretion of the prosecutor. If they left it as a misdemeanor, Chris could have been out with time served next week (or whenever the 1 year anniversary was.) Instead they decided to go for the higher penalty and empanel a grand jury.
Absolutely right, I think he's primarily doing this pro-bono on top of it. Taking on tougher cases like this are also great for publicity and future business even if he doesn't make any money off of it beyond the nominal reimbursement.Maybe someone already answered you, but IIRC Heilberg is doing this because lawyers need to do a certain amount of public defender work every year and so he took on Chris's case.l to meet that requirement. It isn't as if he can charge Chris for his time or anything. The public defender pay is the public defender pay. Otherwise everyone would do it.
My bad it isn't that they have to do public defender work. They have to do probono work. Lawyers have to do 2 percent of their hours a year pro bono.Absolutely right, I think he's primarily doing this pro-bono on top of it. Taking on tougher cases like this are also great for publicity and future business even if he doesn't make any money off of it beyond the nominal reimbursement.
Chris is a:Boy oh boy. I sure hope nobody pulls up Chris' paperwork where he's held. That clerical error 'INCEST W/OWN CHILD' is going to cost him his life if an inmate ever manages to get to him.