🐱 'Harley Quinn,' and why we all lose when superheroes can't eat p*ssy

CatParty

In the multiverse of comic books, there's room for just about every imaginable iteration on the classic superheroes we know and love. Between Zombie Dr. Strange, Centaur Superman, and even a Baby Batman, the possibilities for wacky alternate realities seem endless.

But apparently there is one superpower that will forever elude all our most popular heroes across the entirety of their ever-expanding extended universes — and it's eating pussy. At least that's what DC explicitly told Justin Halpern, co-creator of HBO Max’s raunchy Harley Quinn animated series.

In an interview with Variety, Halpern revealed that they'd been forced to censor a moment in Season 3 which depicted Batman going down on Catwoman, because DC insisted that "'heroes don't do that.'" While Halpern protested the notion that all superheroes were selfish partners, DC appeared far more concerned with Batman's viability as a consumer product. Unlike the villains who do most of the debauchery on Harley Quinn, superheroes generate lots of profit in the form of kid-friendly toys. So, to sum up Halpern's recollection of DC's logic, "'It's hard to sell a toy if Batman is also going down on someone.'"

The news of Batman being a canonically ungenerous lover exploded across the internetwhen the interview first came out last summer (with even Justice League director Zack Snyder contributing his own chaotic tweet to the discourse). But after the first three episodes of Harley Quinn Season 3 dropped on Thursday, July 28, we finally got to see the censorship in action for ourselves.

And, let me tell you, Catwoman isn't the only one who was left out to dry by DC's ban on oral sex. In fact, we've all lost a lot more than just one jokefrom an animated series due to the bizarre prudishness that comic books impose on their superheroes' sexuality.

In the Harley Quinn Season 3, episode 3 opener, the clunkily-reworked joke comes after Poison Ivy ends a call by commiserating with Catwoman about how much better she could do than the guy she's currently seeing. Catwoman agrees, only to put down the phone to reveal an overly eager Batman on his hands and knees, hunched over her lap, performing...a foot massage.

"Shall I continue?" Batman asks the obviously dissatisfied Catwoman like the latex-clad sub that he is. "No, it's not worth it," she sighs.

While the original implications of the scene are hard to miss, the censorship neuters what should've been a dynamite opener into a perplexingly limp start. The show's superb writers recover quickly. But this controversy is only the most recent example of how the MCU and DCEU's puritanical rules around superheroes is holding the entire genre back.

Critics have been calling out Marvel's conspicuous sexlessness since 2013. But in the past year, legendary directors like Steven Soderbergh, Pedro Almodóvar, and Paul Verhoeven joined the chorus by pointing to it as their main gripe with the comic book takeover of the entertainment industry.

Erasing the existence of sexual desire from these characters' lives makes for some pretty dehumanizing storytelling.

The hottest people alive are all virgins who hang out in skin-tight suits together without ever really getting horny for each other.
The total lack of fucking has become one of the most alienating parts of these fantastical cinematic universes, where the hottest people alive are all virgins who hang out in skin-tight suits together without ever really getting horny for each other. Yet while superheroes may not be allowed to express desire or experience pleasure, they're also still simultaneously required to adhere to today's strict, hypersexualized body ideals. Like live-action toys themselves, the superhero movie star is sold to audiences as a sex symbol who can only ever be the object rather than a subject of voyeuristic pleasure.

Tellingly, DC only cares about policing the sexuality of its hero characters. Poison Ivy and Harley Quinn are given total liberty to munch away at each other's carpets throughout Season 3, as they celebrate their newfound love with an "Eat Bang Kill" tour. (Is pleasuring your partner something only the morally corrupt do?) To make matters worse, Batman's moral virtue (or rather commercial viability) doesn't seem at all threatened by the near-sociopathic acts of mass violence he commits later on in the season. We won't get into specifics to spare you the spoilers, but let's just say they include but are not limited to terrorizing a traumatized child and almost sacrificing the entirety of Gotham to get what he wants.

At the end of the day, we all know that DC's insistence that superheroes don't schtup is a financial rather a moral statement. It's a damn shame, though. There's undoubtedly plenty of money to be made from leaning into — rather than shying away from — the sexiness of it all by launching an adult line of superhero-themed toys instead, if you catch our drift.

Until then, though, I guess Catwoman will have to make do with caring for her own pussycat. Anyway, she can keep her sulky, sexless Dark Knight. We're just happy that we get to join Harley and Ivy on their horny honeymoon.
 
I can't help but find it pretty funny that feminism has turned Harley Quinn from a smart and well respected psychologist who's interest in the joker led her to obsession, to a ditzy, homoerotic lesbian who can only overreact.


Art imitates life I suppose
She went from an interesting side character to Deadpool as written by Reddit dressed as a hipster clown slut
 
The foot massage joke is a lot funnier than an explicit teehee pussy eating amirite screen, tbh.
I mean, I've seen the new episode. It's dire compared to S1/S2 which were barring the S2 finale pretty good. (If anyone wants my rant on the episode it's here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/harley-quinn-dc-universe-series.63617/page-16#post-12589390 ).

The scene were Batman was massaging Catwoman's feet is actually kind of funny now it's been explained to me. He asks "do you want me to continue" and she says "why bother" or something like that. If you are deep into discussions about this stuff I guess it works because you see the context that he's not allowed to go down on her. Without that context which will be most people it's just this weird stilted moment which looks like they're trying to make Batman a putz for no reason.

Anyway, the episode was bad. They also changed the writers for "diversity". Not kidding - that's their actual stated reason.
 
Oh God I can't tell you how much I hate that fucking Harley Quinn show. Mainly because the shows is most popular with two kinds of people:
Trannies and
Lesbian obsessed coomers

Seriously, Jim Sterling constantly features the show on his dying YouTube channel and men who are obsessed with lesbians are obsessed with the show. Damn shame as I liked Harley as a kid and thought Harley and Ivy made for better friends, like Thelma and Louise, then lesbian lovers.
 
Dear Lord are they digging this up again?

I say let them do it. They've published multiple articles, whined non damn stop about this nonsense joke. Let them do it. Then when the scene has aired release every single email of them begging to do this scene, every single article, every single whining tweet demanding they be allowed to make that joke. And then release the writer's porn search history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundae
DC also has a long-standing policy of "superheroes don't kill"... I don't know if DC is any less Jewish than Marvel, but it sure feels like it. DC superheroes were supposed to be this platonic ideal and embody human virtue; particularly Superman, but also Batman.
Bro it's been half a decade since the comics code was abandoned.
Also she's not a hero but remember when Harley Quinn blew up all those kids?
 

Damn shame as I liked Harley as a kid and thought Harley and Ivy made for better friends, like Thelma and Louise, then lesbian lovers.
Me too. I hate that nowadays (in these shows) friendship is seemingly no longer existent and if two people hang out with each other, it must mean they want to screw. It's so gross, this need to relentlessly sexualize everything to be 'progressive.'
 
Me too. I hate that nowadays (in these shows) friendship is seemingly no longer existent and if two people hang out with each other, it must mean they want to screw. It's so gross, this need to relentlessly sexualize everything to be 'progressive.'
I noticed that this trend tends to mostly be towards females then males. If a female is friendly with another girl that must mean they want to scissor each other. Then again all these shows and video games and what not are made by AGP's with a lesbian fetish. It isn't a fetish and sexualizing a group of people if the men making it identify as women and lesbians. Convenient!
 
I noticed that this trend tends to mostly be towards females then males. If a female is friendly with another girl that must mean they want to scissor each other. Then again all these shows and video games and what not are made by AGP's with a lesbian fetish. It isn't a fetish and sexualizing a group of people if the men making it identify as women and lesbians. Convenient!
AGPs and lesbian fetishes tends to be strongly linked with porn. A lot of this influence is also seen in the comic books, you see female super heros in skimpy suits and flexed in ways not found in nature. All any of this does though is make it look like the comics industry is run by old decrepit coomers who are too obsessed with stroking it off then crafting a good product. It's makes the comics industry look terrible, who wants to buy this crap when it's embarrassing to look at, or being seen reading it or watching it by other people?
 
Yeah, no shit. You think those old Spider-Man memes are prolific; wait until someone draws and broadcasts a scene of Batman performing oral sex on someone. This was absolutely the right decision.

DC also has a long-standing policy of "superheroes don't kill"... I don't know if DC is any less Jewish than Marvel, but it sure feels like it. DC superheroes were supposed to be this platonic ideal and embody human virtue; particularly Superman, but also Batman.
That's not a DC thing as much as it is a holdover from an era long gone. Those were pretty much the standard rules for most protagonists in any media up til relatively recently. Westerns would be the exception. The 70s got a bit violent across the board in media, but there was a fair amount of pushback and then the 80s sanitized a lot of violence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grumpy Pickle Rick
AGPs and lesbian fetishes tends to be strongly linked with porn. A lot of this influence is also seen in the comic books, you see female super heros in skimpy suits and flexed in ways not found in nature. All any of this does though is make it look like the comics industry is run by old decrepit coomers who are too obsessed with stroking it off then crafting a good product. It's makes the comics industry look terrible, who wants to buy this crap when it's embarrassing to look at, or being seen reading it or watching it by other people?
Dude, imagine being a woman right now who is into geek stuff. I am a massive dork. I have always loved geek culture and geeky stuff. Back when I was a young teenage girl I never thought much about seeing a beautiful, half naked woman on the cover of some comic book or video game. As someone with brothers I knew that, like most men, men in that industry liked to see a beautiful and badass woman in bikini armor, like Red Sonya. Sure, it was a little immature but looking back on it now it is much more wholesome then what men in the industry are like now. Now it is nothing but gross men trying to inject their fetish into everything but under the guise of "feminism" and "progressivism". You have the likes of Neil Drunkmann saying that his characters were made to "give representation to woman of all strides" when characters like Abby and Ellie are really nothing more then Neil's fetish. Abby was Neil's muscle girl fetish and Ellie was Neil's hebephilia and lesbian fetish. Anthony Burch brags about doing nothing but adding his sick fetish into every game he writes for. Catwoman was a self insert for Tom King as was Lady Thor for Jason Aarons.
I long for the days when men just like to ogle at half naked women and draw them in bikini armor over the sick twisted shit we have now.
 
But where will the next generation of superheroes come from???

Seriously though, what's with weirdos and their obsession with the sex lives of fictional characters? This is downright incel shit.
I'll tell you where it came from, it came from lonely, friendless, fatherless children whose overworked mothers had them just sit in front of a screen 8 hours a day in order to keep them quiet as well as unrestricted internet access as a kid. Eventually these kids grow up but the damage is already done and the coomer brain mentality is in full swing.
 
Back