Alejandra Caraballo / Alex Caraballo / @Esqueer_ - Twitter trans rights activist, cyberlaw teacher who doesn't understand cyberlaw, mass flaggot, humiliated in congress by a real woman.

Damn. Imagine busting your ass to get to Harvard Law. You could have spent your senior year of college partying, but you studied for the LSAT. You're taking out a shit ton of loans, because you want to be taught by the best.

Then you find out one of the faculty is a graduate of fucking Brooklyn Law, who used to specialize in name changes. And thinks he's dressing professionally when he looks like a cut rate JLo.

Shit. How do you NOT start drinking heavily once all that starts sinking in?
 
View attachment 3548449
Lawyer doesn’t understand Supreme Court decision.
(A)
This tweet is actually stupider. There is absolutely no way this dude wants lawyers aka the law out of the way of all medical decisions. He would never accept it. I'll use an example in the same framework and subject so even an idiot like himself can understand it. A religious hospital refuses to perform abortions on moral grounds. This dude would want lawyers determining medical care so fast we don't have the tools to measure it. An insurance company denying troon care to kids for any reason? This dude is already claiming it's Genocide even though I just made it up.

The irony is that even being a TTT grad doesn’t have to be a career-killer outside of V20 NYC Biglaw circles if you have the least bit of initiative and ability to think outside the box. An acquaintance of mine graduated from an even lower-ranked school than Brooklyn Law, but put in their dues and worked their way up from the bottom of the totem pole at the local DA office for several years before making the jump to corporate in-house, and is now living a very cushy life indeed as a partner for one of the Big Four. Of course, their practice area is something useful, rather than LGBTQ++++ advocacy.

Hell, even an ambulance-chasing shitlaw bottom feeder can become a multimillionaire if they hustle (and are willing to throw away their dignity and scruples, of course).

Meanwhile, you just know Alejandr@ is the type to milk the H-bomb for every ounce of reflected glory he can to try to deflect/dismiss any criticism or counterarguments on Twitter, while actual Harvard students and grads all silently look down their noses at him and his TTT pedigree that still cost him just as much in tuition as an actual Harvard degree. We’re talking over $150,000 in student debt here, assuming no scholarships, assistance from his family, etc., and not taking NYC living expenses into account, all for the privilege of working in pro bono tranny legal aid. :story:
These dudes are so often in hells of their own making. Many such cases.

He might be dumb enough to think Harvard students actually respect him though.
 
Damn. Imagine busting your ass to get to Harvard Law. You could have spent your senior year of college partying, but you studied for the LSAT. You're taking out a shit ton of loans, because you want to be taught by the best.

Then you find out one of the faculty is a graduate of fucking Brooklyn Law, who used to specialize in name changes. And thinks he's dressing professionally when he looks like a cut rate JLo.

Shit. How do you NOT start drinking heavily once all that starts sinking in?
Law school coursework is very dependant on professor too. It's not really as standardized as most fields so a lot is dependant on how the teacher teaches the material and what case law he tells you to study. So having a literal loon who thinks he's woman may be detrimental to your success and not just demoralizing.
 
I found this weeks ago but figured I should share it here now. Before trooning out, Alex had a shitty, cringe EDM "career" with some chick named Janet Krupin.
Here's the channel: Trillium (Archive)
nice job trying to make your group's name sound like TRIVIUM btw, unoriginal faggot.
firefox_J00ZhBBTQq.png
"InRemMusic" is Alex's old twitter username. I used a tool to check his current "Esqueer_" twitter account and its previous username was InRemMusic lol.

Here's an interview they had on some other channel called YRT ENT (Young Raw Talent Entertainment), this is the channel's only video lmao, I'm thinking Alex made it to perhaps promote himself, very pathetic.
"Young Raw Talent: Trillium"
Local archive:

1:56 "umm I'm here for law school-"

Here's another video, Alex is the cuck wearing his gay Pierce the Veil shirt in the back clicking wav files on the laptop lol.
"TRILLIUM - Aurora EP Release Party (Official After Movie)"
Local archive:


They also have an Instagram page with a LOT of posts.

Trillium Instagram (Archive)
1659392568353.png

Alex is even tagged on one of the pictures of the singer, further confirming it's him.

1659392626621.png

Fat.
 
Last edited:
I found this weeks ago but figured I should share it here now. Before trooning out, Alex had a shitty, cringe EDM "career" with some chick named Janet Krupin.
Here's the channel: Trillium (Archive)
nice job trying to make your group's name sound like TRIVIUM btw, unoriginal faggot.
View attachment 3553190
"InRemMusic" is Alex's old twitter username. I used a tool to check his current "Esqueer_" twitter account and its previous username was InRemMusic lol.

Here's an interview they had on some other channel called YRT ENT (Young Raw Talent Entertainment), this is the channel's only video lmao, I'm thinking Alex made it to perhaps promote himself, very pathetic.
"Young Raw Talent: Trillium"
Local archive:
View attachment 3553187
1:56 "umm I'm here for law school-"

Here's another video, Alex is the cuck wearing his gay Pierce the Veil shirt in the back clicking wav files on the laptop lol.
"TRILLIUM - Aurora EP Release Party (Official After Movie)"
Local archive:
View attachment 3553206

They also have an Instagram page with a LOT of posts.

Trillium Instagram (Archive)
View attachment 3553219

Alex is even tagged on one of the pictures of the singer, further confirming it's him.

View attachment 3553224

Fat.
Man, he really is a fat fuck, and he honestly did not look bad in the slightest. Reminds me a bit of Sewerslvt before his whole career in his fucking shitty breakcore whatever music but beginning to troon out slightly (mostly due to long hair and having a "milf body"). it is sad really, he could have actually just been a good lawyer and not fucking troon out and sperg 24/7 about republican lawmakers and support kids cutting their fucking dicks off. Could have been so much more... Ack, that was the past. We have the milk now, and it will flow.
 
Alex, you could have committed to some body-building, buffed up a bit, and easily been attractive enough for chicks being a lawyer that isn't overtly, immediately disgusting.

Instead, you chose to troon out. Were you sold the dream that the titty skittles would magically turn you into your typical "hot latina"? Only to stare in the mirror with your dyke haircut and be unable to unsee the male face staring back?

Are you so angry at what you've become you want other innocent children to cut their dicks off so they, too, can be as miserable as you?

And as a reminder: there's no such thing as trans children. Only grooming victims.
 
Alejandro may be one of the most despicable troons that inhabit that waste disposal facilty that Twitter has become. I truly hope those etruscan bimbo pills cause a bunch of health issues down the road for the lovely fella.

Also, does he not have a middle name? Weird.
Eh, some people don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Churros con Manteca
I feel like I've seen this lawtroon in passing in threads other than Keffals but I might be wrong. Maybe a news story, the Sideshow thread or some ratking tweetchain. Glad they get their own thread though, nice OP

I love it when shitty lawyers threaten judges/justices; doesn't have to be judges they interact with, it's just so taboo in general. Always blows up in their faces later, and I can't wait to see more here.
 
AB05501C-C185-41B1-90C4-3E0B2FC758F2.jpeg
I genuinely hate David Hogg.
33101C94-1927-47BB-880A-B9E0A0D3D8C7.jpeg
This was retweeted today.
4F093E99-C72A-47EA-8F37-8E9A6135B04F.jpeg
This retweet makes some of the retweets further down make more sense. Alex also follows Mardoll.
B56537E8-478A-4E64-B4BB-6F722AD04614.jpeg
Alex, what the fuck are you talking about?
(A)
John, fuck off. You’re not a woman.
4DD26634-36BB-451A-B6A6-3302341A0D3D.jpeg
(A)
F1A0D6BF-B0B8-4522-8A5B-429E2F436D9F.jpeg
4AE13B0A-4642-427A-AB6C-857AA2F27984.png
That sounds like a wholesome story where a puppy helps a young woman from making irreversible decisions.
E1E311C5-EA9D-4FB4-B96C-D0E89BE814CA.jpeg
I’ve seen the “dark Brandon” meme for a bit. It’s never been funny. Oh yeah, excuse the :politisperg: , but remember when Joe Biden wanted to wait before attacking the bin Laden compound?
(A)
0FB86DEF-9C95-49D6-9B10-2C68C2E91569.jpegCBE87E2E-FD7F-4B50-840C-2220121D2FEF.jpeg
(A)
C42DF34F-D7D3-4158-BEC6-B5A1ADD8A4E0.jpeg
I love how NYT is now getting shit on for not being left enough. It’s funny.
(A)
No one is perfect, but most of us don’t preach on Twitter while working for Lockheed Martin.
249F1B30-0CC0-47D9-97EA-BF4E8964ED28.jpeg
It’s transphobic to expose lies.
F0C91E2D-592E-4367-9B53-B48008FC38F0.jpeg

987D7DFB-2731-458A-8C0D-30D30BA56A50.jpeg
Shut up about August 5th. You’ve said it so many times already.
00E1D658-C0EB-48F1-924C-1E471BFC4071.jpegAAF0A14E-3004-4298-AA80-7E4B65DAA7FE.jpegFEF5EC88-1847-42A8-877A-39CDC1CD4F15.jpeg
LITERALLY GENOCIDE
(A)
13433ED6-E0EB-4CFF-8EBA-3F3104E9BC4E.jpeg
I agree with Alex here, Dan Snyder should have been punished much more than he was.
(A)
7928E0AD-4315-4123-A276-00A18D2C2D19.jpeg
This second tweet is just word salad. Fancy words don’t make your argument better.
 
Don't most Hispanics use a combination of their father's first surname and their mother's first surname? Or is he just faking that too?
Many hispanic people in the US only use one surname. Typically it is the paternal surname.

I’m not sure why that is but I’m guessing it’s for assimilation reasons.
 
Last edited:
David, I know you're just a recent college student but nobody in power in your lifetime could have stopped climate change or gun violence. You couldn't have either, because you're stupid.

This was retweeted today.
View attachment 3556090
This retweet makes some of the retweets further down make more sense. Alex also follows Mardoll.
View attachment 3556091
Alex, what the fuck are you talking about?
(A)
John, fuck off. You’re not a woman.
View attachment 3556093
View attachment 3556126
That sounds like a wholesome story where a puppy helps a young woman from making irreversible decisions.
Ana Mardoll, John and Zach. So his literature, tech and science sources are as qualified as his lawyering.

This article is hilarious, so its endorsement by Troon Lawyer and whoever this person is saying "No one I trust more to look into" than the author is great. The author who is... Melissa Gira Grant, her qualifications?
1659521871908.png

Studied comparative literature (no degree) and is not a lawyer. But was a sex worker and is a writer about sex work. Fantastic.

The CDA, except Section 230 (which Troon Lawyer has previously displayed great knowledge about), was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court back in Reno v. ACLU in 1997.

The article does mention Reno v. ACLU but says:
1659518290096.png


The Supreme Court (which goes above "district court judges") struck down the entire fucking law but the article never even mentions this while mentioning the case that did it!

BUT IT GETS WORSE:
1659519107706.png


Okay, so read the laws here:
1659519644412.png1659519626071.png

Indecent is defined as:
1659521041849.png

The article does admit this isn't really true says the ACLU:
1659520337710.png


But then says:
1659520398670.png


So what's the argument here? Who is selling information about abortion on the internet that lacks "serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value"? What could possibly meet this standard for obscenity?

Here's what this article is actually saying: you could theoretically read these provisions as saying that anything said about abortion incites murder therefore someone can interpret this as being a carve out to the First Amendment and therefore someone could arrest you for violating federal obscenity laws and then the Supreme Court could theoretically uphold that as not being a carve out to the First Amendment because they've also upheld in Miller that theoretically obscenity is an exception to the First Amendment. But this is also true about any kind of speech regarding murder, arson or assassination. Yet, the standard for inciting speech in Brandenberg means that merely talking about these things IS NOT INCITEMENT.

Could the federal government arrest you for saying that a good way to kill someone is with a gun and that Troon Lawyer is a person and also that Wal-Mart is a good place to buy a gun? In theory, yes, this would meet the same standards for obscenity and incitement that is being suggested here. Sure, it's never been done, but theoretically it could be and then the Supreme Court could then uphold it even though they haven't yet and nobody thinks this might happen but it always theoretically could.

So our Troon Lawyer retweeted a tweet about an article from a non-lawyer who has a paranoid conspiracy theory about the law.

And look at that, in the thread on Twitter from the writer is someone I've seen in the replies of all these people worried about the TROON GENOCIDE that is happening and wonder if they should just kill themselves that I put in the trans sideshow thread a few times:
1659522183746.png


Then I looked at who Troon Lawyer RT'd this from, oh look, another troon "expert" lawyer at the Harvard Cyber Law Clinic who shits all over Twitter constantly:
1659522290540.png


And who replied but the author:
1659522323387.png


And now we're all smarter from everyone sharing this lunacy all over Twitter about the coming fascism that will throw us all in federal prison for posting about abortion online if they have the time between Genociding us all for being troons or whatever the fuck else they're going to Genocide us for because we're the most important fucking people at the center of everything on the planet.
 
5B8791C0-654F-4F62-AADD-F70536459388.jpeg011FD06F-7726-49BE-AB28-075F6E8D6420.jpeg
Since someone else has already touched on Hirschfield way better than I could, here’s a link to that.
(A)
386C4D3C-18A0-4FA9-8802-D4FA98CBA6A4.jpeg
We do not care
FA9619FF-D0AF-4BF1-A595-CD1819FECBF8.jpeg

837A5810-CC83-43C2-850A-61CE0C4012C6.jpeg
D1C99949-3A09-44B3-B859-EE652C8815B1.jpeg8978F4EA-EB51-4705-8F53-139250B033D7.jpeg
This is all in response to a now deleted tweet with a video from Gays against Groomers
(A)
81CAA34D-17C1-4135-BDF9-4C673AEAFC2F.jpeg
January 6th did 9/11 and the Holocaust.
(A)
BED35A63-2DA9-4B33-BCD5-37746D7F65AC.jpeg
Twitch stated that the ban was justified, it just needed to be shortened.
78E13928-609A-4287-BA21-5B22C5638D2F.jpeg
Voting in referendums isn’t the reward Republicans want, it’s voting in the midterms.
1BE470AD-72F6-43EF-AC57-F7C5572345E6.jpeg
Here is Zach Drennen and his partner:
B2EA1DCD-73B0-4787-87CC-74D08BC4E47A.jpeg816A7C55-95A4-4620-990C-F0A62600E93D.jpeg
“Yeah, say that you a lesbian, girl, me too”
-Drake
B05B3766-A291-440B-80D3-99A91B8F4621.jpeg

B72D5FC0-DACA-4BD8-9B19-61F9D37F081C.jpegB6D330A7-D129-405D-A5AB-6B5E83D6F74F.jpeg
This is how abortion rights should be working, on a state level. Ofc they could have been codified by the Democrats federally before Roe was overturned, but it’s not like they ever had a supermajority or anything, right?
(A)
0582DCDC-5B3E-4726-8A17-A2D2914D8630.jpeg
Could’ve been codified. The Dems intentionally kept from doing it since they saw no political benefit in doing it.
(A)
03772170-5EE9-494E-94F9-3685CF43AD7F.jpeg
Lowercase r.
(A)
238B3270-4C83-406D-876A-6CECCC317702.jpeg
(A)
106D9F8A-F534-4C8C-A606-4602A8AD70B2.jpeg
If this is unironic, wow this is cringe.
(A)
9C6B9BF2-C34C-4FF4-ADAE-2ECFE664840B.jpeg
Complains about when the courts decide on healthcare except when it’s for troons.
(A)
24F96C49-FF81-4E01-A624-3B616717BE2A.jpeg
Fear mongering
74BDF20B-22EB-4294-8299-F6AED3492119.jpeg

9CBFBEB0-6014-499B-9AA0-F007D13B8905.jpeg
(A)
D7EA468E-DBCB-4E41-884B-D527AF78D785.jpeg
I’m pretty sure the spyware on school computers is to just keep kids from playing games and looking at porn.
(A)
8DE68583-5BE3-4CBF-993E-A54334CC4315.jpeg
CDN is content distribution network I believe.
(A)
 
View attachment 3559356View attachment 3559357
This is how abortion rights should be working, on a state level. Ofc they could have been codified by the Democrats federally before Roe was overturned, but it’s not like they ever had a supermajority or anything, right?
(A)
View attachment 3559358
Could’ve been codified. The Dems intentionally kept from doing it since they saw no political benefit in doing it.
(A)
He's acting like this is some kind of major thing. It's certainly a bit surprising that it won so clearly (59%) but it's not surprising that a conservative state voted to keep the law as is. ~40% of people willing to completely ban abortion is actually larger than the polling usually suggests supports this position (~20%) which means lots of not anti-abortion voters sided with it when asked to choose between no abortion period and abortion. That's not the win that pro-lifers probably predicted but I wouldn't declare victory when half of the toss-up votes went to your opponent taking an extreme position against a moderate one. Especially when you've been running around on Twitter declaring that 80% of people support your own extreme abortion position.

No Republican, let alone "every" Republican, is terrified of this because nobody in Republican districts is going to vote against a Republican for not supporting abortion. Why would a Republican vote for Democrats solely on abortion? Why would you think a poll that was solely about abortion informs you of people's opinion on every other issue? Any Republican willing to vote solely on abortion knows Biden (and Senate Democrats) is there to block any attempt by Republicans to outlaw abortion nationally which actually increases the necessity of getting the other issues correct, no?

View attachment 3559370
CDN is content distribution network I believe.
(A)
This dude wants high walls being erected all over the internet and bringing back the days of when Prodigy/AOL/CompuServe had gated communities users couldn't leave because he assumes they'd never build a wall or gate to keep him out.

Every rational researcher tells you that sending terrorist and extremist groups underground makes them more dangerous and harder to monitor and catch but he doesn't give a shit as long as he could get people who make fun of him banned from the entire internet.
 
Last edited:
75D9A4AE-DB93-4A9B-97FA-E53833F36A88.jpeg
Wow, almost as incompetent as Alex here.
E96B9811-F1B4-4A60-A674-E198F4277F65.jpeg590E750F-C587-4D34-A505-82DF2C0DEBCA.jpeg
I got just the song for this.

Fitting song aside, I think Latin and South America are going to do this regardless. I mean, just look at Brazil, the world leader in trannycide.
(A)
E9E877B5-E8B0-4765-809E-91718762E7B1.jpeg4CB25B82-1290-4710-A51A-56623BA9ED8A.jpeg4055F331-53A9-47A5-9FAC-1768100BEAC3.jpegA8CE7E3E-3E1E-4D49-B1E7-37C1F6D4036D.jpegA3C105CD-9E28-43E5-B7B1-DBB2430CB828.jpeg
B48F370B-5B5F-4235-9FD5-2AB205E43FF0.jpeg
Zach here just wants troons to be free to do whatever without anyone calling them out.
7D44DEC9-870C-4AF1-BF5D-991E84CE8E47.jpeg
(A)
5F44A913-6DFB-4EAE-9149-4E1DB517EE1F.jpeg
Nice typo.
(A)
29F44ABD-4A7C-4107-A9FD-E28A5D428B82.jpeg608B7F52-C9C1-4812-88B3-C616ED489574.jpeg
I don’t trust Alex to know if this is actually a Title VII violation.
(A)
 
View attachment 3561583View attachment 3561584
I got just the song for this.
View attachment 3561617
Fitting song aside, I think Latin and South America are going to do this regardless. I mean, just look at Brazil, the world leader in trannycide.
(A)
1659590942911.png

1659591045430.png

I can't find anything further about this case, the case docket apparently ends in May 14, 2020 with their indictment. Yet Troon Lawyer is blaming Chris Rufo for it? What's the connection supposed to be?

View attachment 3561621View attachment 3561594
I don’t trust Alex to know if this is actually a Title VII violation.
(A)
Alex knows that anyone can submit a complaint about this right? Surely a big powerful lawyer should send this evidence of civil rights violations in to officials right?
 
Back