I'm sure God is real happy with Boebert, who literally got groomed by her husband and continues to defend him while being a fucking sped, to be His messenger to the wicked beings of the US government.
If the Founding Fathers were still alive, they'd be called heretical satanists by biblethumpers.
Don't forget communists as well. Ironically if someone like Stalin were to come around today, I'd imagine these people would be the type to flock behind him because of his ability to be an uncompromising chode with a lust for power.
No, because once he started talking about collectivization and central planning they'd be all "What the fuck?"
Didn't Boebert's husband purposely expose himself to minors in an alleyway? Funny how the right wing loons call the left pedos.
I say that because I think it's the image of a strongman who crushes opposition and everything this person says is gospel that seems to be right up the alley of modern republicans. Ik it's a pretty flimsy comparison but still lol. These kinds of people don't have very many principles and really just want to see the 'other' get crushed. Like say if Donald Trump started talking about nationalizing oil companies because they're owned by chicom globalists that hate america, they would fall right in line.
But again I ask, why did people like this fall behind fascist strongmen like Hitler or Mussolini and not the local Communists like Thälmann or Gramsci? Because the fascist strongmen offered what they wanted - the illusion of superiority and domination over people who they thought were lesser than them.
I won't disagree with you on that, but the modern fanatical republican seems to be much more ideologically brainwashed and what they consider right and wrong is an ever shifting grey area. Anything their side does can be morally justified to them even if it's hypocritcal, and vice versa. They love the cops, but if their side includes factions like the boogaloo boys, and these factions do something noteworthy, they will be fervently anti-police because they're enforcers of globohomo or what have you. This applies to other contradictions in these groups.
The extreme, contradictory incoherence is also a big part of fascism as it was practiced in the 20s and 30s, so perhaps it's about the same level of ideological brainwashing.
Fascism was about national syndicalism through trade unionism, not a bunch of conservatards being losers
Ironic, because this is exactly what Trump Republicans say about Democrats, just replace the boogaloo boys with Antifa.
So basically the parallels have nothing to do with policy but with a characteristic that could be applied to any particular political movement.
When the policies have similar outcomes but aren't verbatim copies, what's wrong with comparing the two?
So you wouldn't be offended at a comparison of Nazi Germany with say, Stalinist Russia? If we're using consequentialism as our measuring bar for moral policy it should follow logically.
fine fine, Hitler was a hebrophiliac, not a pedo, you can have your definitional distinction, it's still repulsive. damn libertarian bullshit
I'm genuinely confused about the rhino.
