It'll be another year or two before I'm comfortable calling it - There's a large lag time between the deed and the birth, and we're still guessing how lockdowns affected reproduction rates. On one hand, stuck indoors 24/7 for a year and a half is the sort of thing that probably leads to a lot of sex in young couples and associated oops factors, but on the other hand, far fewer couples being formed since you can't go out and socialize - certainly among the vaxxed at any rate who presumably also followed all the strict orders. If the trend continues being this low, then I'll call it vax affected.
The wider picture will likely continue to be foggy though, as there's a long history of economic declines reducing birth rates, and economic booms increasing it. The economy has been incredibly warped and now its suffering for it, and its distortion could explain some of it as well. It won't be until we come out into the next boom cycle that we'll have a good idea if there's anything we can reasonably attribute to the vaxx in the wider social consensus.
sweden didn't lock down, and has a drop in birth rate that correlates with retard juice rollout to young people 9 months before. the drops are big.
the drops in birth rate do not correlate with locking down. It correlates with 9 months after childbearing age people got retard juice. Then there was a study of sperm motility that showed a drop in the number of viable sperm after getting pfizered. Then there were studies showing this shit prefers to concentrate in ovary tissue more than any other kind. My mind is open to other explanations, but usually when 3 separate types of evidence point towards the exact same conclusion and the alternate explanations don't line up, I am going to believe what the 3 evidence types indicate until a better explanation comes along.
it seems like it might be temporary.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/good-fertility-news-for-vaccinated <<<this guy's substack has several articles about the unprecedented nature of the drops in birth rate in several countries. In germany they even had numbers showing a simultaneous drop in births AND abortions, unheard of. Usually if one of those numbers goes down, the other goes up.
I don’t know is this was ever covered in the old thread - I came to it late
But is there a reasoning for why some people get upper respiratory cold symptoms from Covid, and why others get GI symptoms? Is this a difference between vaxed or not ?
it is because when viruses evolve naturally they develop an affinity for specific types of tissue through selection pressures. Germs have to evolve to deal with the circumstances of our bodies. When you grow something in a lab, the germs don't have to do any of that shit, and you end up with a weird disease. From what I understand they tried to make it attack all human tissue, a situation that isn't really possible with natural diseases, they are stuck with whatever mode of entry into the body they happen to have, no scientists are there to assist them. So we have something that behaves like a jack of all trades, though the mode of transmission is usually respiratory. It isn't just the uncommon way that respiratory and GI symptoms present, there are also neurological and blood coagulation symptoms. The coagulation symptoms are the most unusual part of this.
I don't know why some people get GI symptoms and others don't. I am going to assume that it has to do with the differences in the immune system that exist between all people, but perhaps someone will figure out more soon. Unless the answer is inconvenient to people in power, it seems like the kind of covid research that can be approved and carried out without a lot of fear on the part of the scientists or journals.
