Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

2012? The internet not being ubiquitous? Are you high? 1990's yeah, fine... Just because everybody didn't have a smartphone didn't mean that the internet was new territory. Hell, Facebook had been around for eight years at that point.
If you wanted to know what was happening, you'd have to have CNN or Fox News on 24/7. Maybe look into your computer for a few minutes. People with smartphones then were just watching videos, playing games or using social media. Social media wasn't as political then as it is now.

Internet was modern then, yes. But it wasn't a main beacon for news like today.
 
Where in the Rulebook of Friendship says friends should aspire to look like one another? It's not high school anymore.

True Friendship is to be frank and tell your friends that he or she is on the path of self-destruction.
Tell me you're jealous of women with boyfriends without telling me you're jealous of women with boyfriends.
That woman has never fell in love with a real person before.

The toast line is probably about this stupid idea of some random white guy eating white toast with nothing on it, unlike the enlightened culinary mastery of smearing a smashed avocado on top of toast (never mind that avocados are almost disgustingly bland themselves).
I find it curious that the Chinese regard the charred rice at the bottom of a coal-cooked pot as a serendipitous delight, yet toast is regarded as some kind of joke in the west (remember the "toast sandwich" meme? Toast sandwich is actually quite tasty.)
 
I find it curious that the Chinese regard the charred rice at the bottom of a coal-cooked pot as a serendipitous delight, yet toast is regarded as some kind of joke in the west (remember the "toast sandwich" meme? Toast sandwich is actually quite tasty.)
I will say from experience that pot-edge rice does have a nice charm to it due to the crunch, and that is probably a big reason why frying leftover rice is a popular recipe. As for toast sandwiches, I think that three pieces of bread as a sandwich is a little excessive, but it makes sense as something somewhat filling when you're poor as shit. The real story here is about toast water (I believe it was called), where a piece of bread was charred before pouring boiling water onto it like you were making tea and then straining the water and serving cold. It came from a British recipe book as a medicinal remedy for people unable to keep much of anything down (the charcoal would help with potential toxins), but of course the ghouls used it as an example of "white people can't cook food, and think salt is spicy" as if dumping a pile of Ms. Dash onto everything is the only way something is "properly seasoned food."
 
Last edited:
Preemptive thread payment for the below:



See, there's this weird fetish among SJWs to claim that European (White) food is universally bland slop, and they like to trot out a few weird British sandwiches as demonstrations of this (most of which were either Depression-era or for those too sick to eat). The toast line is probably about this stupid idea of some random white guy eating white toast with nothing on it, unlike the enlightened culinary mastery of smearing a smashed avocado on top of toast (never mind that avocados are almost disgustingly bland themselves).
I find it curious that the Chinese regard the charred rice at the bottom of a coal-cooked pot as a serendipitous delight, yet toast is regarded as some kind of joke in the west (remember the "toast sandwich" meme? Toast sandwich is actually quite tasty.)
I will say from experience that pot-edge rice does have a nice charm to it due to the crunch, and that is probably a big reason why frying leftover rice is a popular recipe. As for toast sandwiches, I think that three pieces of bread as a sandwich is a little excessive, but it makes sense as something somewhat filling when you're poor as shit. The real story here is about toast water (I believe it was called), where a piece of bread was charred before pouring boiling water onto it like you were making tea before you strained the water and served it cold. It came from a British recipe book as a medicinal remedy for people unable to keep much of anything down (the charcoal would help with potential toxins), but of course the ghouls used it as an example of "white people can't cook food, and think salt is spicy" as if dumping a pile of Ms. Dash onto everything is the only way something is "properly seasoned food."
Forgive me a sperg, but it's always these people who claim to be great defenders of the oppressed and downtrodden while not giving two shits about anything either
A. Actually traditional
or
B. Improved-upon by their precious indigenous people

Let's look at Mexico as an example. A lot of pork culture comes from cannibalism. No one wants to admit it, but it's true. Don't get all buttmad about it either. It was a religious and survival thing and now we have carnitas. Deal with it.
If you really want to get SJW-y about it, look at bugs. You see people talk about "Oh tons of traditional cultures eat bugs, we're just spoiled westerners!" and then they shill you shit like this:
1660094671692.png
When a "traditional" way of eat-the-bug would be like this expensive as fuck ant caviar because humans can't digest chitin.
Oh yeah, and also it's not a "harmless and sustainable" food either.
 
Last edited:
Just check out the automated answer with the misspelling when people rightfully call Heavy Metal on this future woke goes broke project.
View attachment 3582988
View attachment 3582989
View attachment 3582995
RIP Heavy Metal. It's hard to be edgy and fun when you're trying to pander to whiny activists who don't care about your content anyway. Not that it stops these companies from self-destruction.

At the very least, I can only hope that someday someone else fills the void left by companies like Heavy Metal.
 
RIP Heavy Metal. It's hard to be edgy and fun when you're trying to pander to whiny activists who don't care about your content anyway. Not that it stops these companies from self-destruction.

At the very least, I can only hope that someday someone else fills the void left by companies like Heavy Metal.
I know you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, but the shaved-head woman is a bit of a red flag. (Who wants to bet there will be racially woke plot points?) These whiny activists must have prime blackmail material on them to get them to so slavishly and self-destructively bow down.
 
Remember when the Heavy Metal movie opened with a flying space convertible landing on Earth? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
It's probably my nostalgia talking, but I miss when pop culture was fun. Sure, it could still be stupid, awful, and shallow even back then, but rose-tinted glasses be damned it was a lot better than this.

How the fuck does anyone have any fun these days if you're sticking strictly to mainstream normie shit?
 
Preemptive thread payment for the below:


View attachment 3582836
You know what's funny? That same episode critiqued how soul food has turned unhealthy. AND how outside forces would mess up decent neighborhoods so that the land can be sold for dirt cheap.

Hmmm....

cbb4c379ba3b05b9cbb03d038f845876.gif

What does THAT remind you of?
 
One thing that bothered me:

I saw on Tumblr and Twitter acknowledgements tha the pro-BGLT+ crowd really is getting more aggressive and violent. (Do you remember 'die cis scum' or 'I hate straight people'?) The stated reasoning is that 'homophobes' killed all of the nice BGLT+ people, which means tha they would have to deal wi the mean BGLT+ people.
If homophobes really were that murderous, then they would reason 'They outright said to me tha they want me dead! In fact, they start riots where people wh oppose them die! I have the righ to self-defence!'
...that, or 'They finally show their true colours! I knew that no queer person is good!'

Either way, that 'mean BGLT+' reasoning falls, if you think abou things.
 
I have a funny feeling that Mary Shelley wouldn't have been thrilled about the interracial relationship on the cover of her work.
View attachment 3583655
Sure Mary Shelley may have been open-minded for her time, but if you tell these same people that the Founding Fathers were open-minded for their time, they don't want to hear it. You can just pick and choose characteristics to shine a modern light on for dead people, you can win any argument that way
 
Sure Mary Shelley may have been open-minded for her time, but if you tell these same people that the Founding Fathers were open-minded for their time, they don't want to hear it. You can just pick and choose characteristics to shine a modern light on for dead people, you can win any argument that way
You don't even have to go back anywhere close to the Founding Fathers for a good example of this type of thing. Look at all of the Antifa types who talk about punching "Nazis" and how they're just like the "antifascists" who went to fight Hitler during WW2 lmao.

Somehow I doubt that the men (who were overwhelmingly straight, white and Christian) that went to fight in the war would be all that impressed by their slovenly great-grandchildren being racial masochists, promoting troons and gays, etc. Being "progressive" back then sure didn't mean putting your 4 year old on HRT, bitching about white men breathing, or taking your kids to have books read to them by drag queens at the local library.
 
Tbf not even the ones who fought for communism would have wanted it.
I don't think i need to repeat it, but pretty much all commie figures were inmense racist and homophobic people. For once, most communist figures saw homosexuality (and all extensions of LGBTABCDE) as a vice of the burguoise, a moral degeneracy that was harbored by capitalism and in the USSR it was seen as the ultimate moral decay of the west.

As for racism, i doubt i have to say much, specially since most latin american freedom fighters saw blacks as a burden on the movement, just leeches that gave little and ate up everything. Even slavers saw blacks as the bottom of the barrel. You know that when slave ships and slave traders arrived east they had an enormous preference over asian slaves over blacks because they asians were obedient to a fault and extremely industrious. If it wasn't for the stern anti-slavery laws that China and Japan implemented at the time to protect their populace from the predation of slave traders, we would have seen more asian slaves than blacks.
 
You don't even have to go back anywhere close to the Founding Fathers for a good example of this type of thing. Look at all of the Antifa types who talk about punching "Nazis" and how they're just like the "antifascists" who went to fight Hitler during WW2 lmao.

Somehow I doubt that the men (who were overwhelmingly straight, white and Christian) that went to fight in the war would be all that impressed by their slovenly great-grandchildren being racial masochists, promoting troons and gays, etc. Being "progressive" back then sure didn't mean putting your 4 year old on HRT, bitching about white men breathing, or taking your kids to have books read to them by drag queens at the local library.
*cough*
 
Back