I still think it's complete and utter bull shit a jury would even need to think about it. He's guilty as sin. Unless the jury is braindead they should have unanimously said "ya we think he did it let's start the trial"
I thought jury of peers would be a jury of 40 something year olds that would cut chris no slack not a jury of fools who'd even consider the idea proposed by heilberg. I mean really I can't even fathom giving the argument of "even though this guy raped his mother, confessed to it, stole from her, and the court has DNA evidence to prove it, he should be allowed to walk away with no consequences cuz he's a retard and claims to be jesus"
I don't suppose anyone knows when the next court date is