US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
If you've been to a Six Flags in this century you know Six Flags isn't mostly white. The prior owners did everything possible to make it super cheap and targeted to a niggerlicious clientele and it "worked." Six Flags has just been the ghetto with rollercoasters for a long time.
That why niggers keep dying in rollercoasters?
 
If you've been to a Six Flags in this century you know Six Flags isn't mostly white. The prior owners did everything possible to make it super cheap and targeted to a niggerlicious clientele and it "worked." Six Flags has just been the ghetto with rollercoasters for a long time.
Current management has literally called out they are gonna raise prices till the riff raff stop coming.
 
Six Flags whole thing was that it was the discount budget theme park for poor fag families who couldn't afford Disneyland and it always kind of shocked me that they, like acne medication, suddenly stopped doing ANY advertisement or promotion post-2000 after spending a huge amount of cash in the 90s promoting their shit.

Also, of note for how the wind is blowing: John Oliver basically did a blink and miss mention of the entire FBI raid ala how he buried the lead on the trucker protests in Canada, to start his show and then spent the bulk of the episode (which BTW was expanded by about five minutes) shitting on Biden over the Afghanistan withdrawal and then wasted the last third showing fan art of him and marrying a head of lettace/cabbage.

I haven't followed what Colbert has said about the raid for my own health blood pressure-wise, but whoever is Oliver's handler within the DNC, apparently told him to badmouth Biden about Afghanistan and not go into detail about the FBI raid.
 
If you've been to a Six Flags in this century you know Six Flags isn't mostly white. The prior owners did everything possible to make it super cheap and targeted to a niggerlicious clientele and it "worked." Six Flags has just been the ghetto with rollercoasters for a long time.
When I visited many ages ago, Six Flags Magic Mountain was a pretty good park (you just have to pay out your ass or wait in line all day) that didn't seem overtly crowded with certain sorts of people. But then I remember hearing/seeing an ad for Six Flags Atlanta as a kid and asking my parents why we went to other parks instead of going there and they told me how it's a very scuzzy and dirty park to stay away from. Never did go there, but I'm guessing they were probably right.
 
That's exactly the point imo, he is such an obvious freak that people will want to avoid nuclear energy and trusting people like him to be in charge of it. That is my take on it. I don't think he reflects the admin wanting to do nuclear energy I think it's the opposite and they're hoping normal people are weirded out by it enough to think "maybe later".

No one in charge of this administration wants what is best for this country. If it's something actually beneficial to America you shouldn't expect Biden to support it.

Edit - as an aside, looks like a jury has awarded Roy Moore $8.2 million after it was confirmed the sexual misconduct bullshit against him was defamation by a Dem led PAC. Cross another piece of whataboutism off the list since he's one of the favorites that retarded NPCs throw up whenever Hunter or Joe's love of underage girls is brought up.


WHAT!?

That literally cost an election. There should be jail sentences and hangings for that shit. This is gonna be one of those side stories when everything comes to a head. Somebody’s gonna pay in Minecraft for that and I’m not gonna be dumb enough to feel sorry for whoever does.


Edited to avoid doublepost. Also autocorrect struck again.

I’ve got an unpopular opinion on nuclear energy, so allow me to try and win this thread over:

We should not try to replace our power grid with nuclear energy. I’m glad the Democrats are staying away from it. The main issue with nuclear energy is it’s a crapshoot on a generational level, where snake eyes means a significant portion of the continent is rendered uninhabitable for hundreds or even thousands of years.

Nuclear energy hasn’t even been around for a hundred years and we’ve already had two near misses that could’ve really gone sideways (Chernobyl and Fukushima). Yes, I get that the Slavs were too retarded to boil water and yes, I get that Fukushima had a massive earthquake. The problem is every time you staff a nuclear reactor, you’re rolling the dice: they’re probably smart enough to boil water… but if they aren’t, you could say goodbye to the entire tristate area. Also, one really bad earthquake one state away could poison your state’s aquifers.

Relying on nuclear power is like spinning a roulette wheel every morning with a 99.999% chance of giving you a tasty ice cream cone and a 0.001% chance of wiping out your entire family tree. Sure, you might just enjoy tasty ice cream for years or even the rest of your life but it’s just not worth the risk in the long term.

You stumbled on the approach, screwed up the dismount, and barely landed on your feet.

Harshness aside, your fears are relatively unfounded. If we push for more nuclear plants, then cores and the like will become relatively cheaper and faster to build via mass production. Which means that if something goes wrong, the plant foremen will say ”screw it, we can get a new one” and do whatever it takes to contain the core, even if it is rendered useless instead of trying to salvage the situation, which is where the risk comes from.

IIRC the problem isn’t trying to stop the meltdown, it is trying to stop the meltdown AND save the reactor. I could be wrong on that front, I just recalled that being a compliant about Fukushima back when my college buddies were talking about it a few weeks after it happened.
 
Last edited:
They refused to vote for him, in one of the reddest states. Take the word of someone from there.

I‘m still going to be mad over him losing via lies. I was waiting for criminal charges to settle the matter back when it happened, because it was the fastest way to determine if it was a lie. I didn’t know that he could win a defamation suit over it. That’s pretty damning.
 
Rate me :late: whatever, this FBI raid drama has proven to me that they won't stop until Trump is imprisoned or dead. They want him completely ruined or in the ground. They don't know why or what they would charge him with but they want it done. I just find that really creepy.
Correction: they want him ruined AND in the ground.
 
@Gehenna So like the unions were with the dems and the group that didnt like unions was with the GOP. The group that s enjoyed off shoring labor and keep getting mergers approved etc.

Different from big tech or investment banks/funds
 
Last edited:
@Gehenna So like the unions were with the dems and the group that didnt like unions was with the GOP. The group that s enjoyed off shoring labor and keep getting mergers approved etc.

Different from big tech or investment banks/funds
That is a somewhat simplistic view of things, but working within that:

It is largely a myth that the big donors to either party break down to "Unions for Dems and Wall Street for Reps", in fact wall street splits to either based on very clear personal interest. The only real difference is how either side report it. Most Republicans have the money bundled and sent to their campaigns directly and thus release it on their tax returns. Democrats instead tend to have it sent to organizations like the DNC who they then lean on for money. The narrative of "The Reps are for big business" comes from more transparency rather than reality.

With that slight clarification out of the way, wall street still does all it has.
 
Rate me :late: whatever, this FBI raid drama has proven to me that they won't stop until Trump is imprisoned or dead. They want him completely ruined or in the ground. They don't know why or what they would charge him with but they want it done. I just find that really creepy.
No, the creepy thing will be in 2028 or 2032 when another Republican runs or wins and instantly becomes just as hated, with just as much unhinged madness behind the eyes of the peacenik tribe.

I remember the same hatred, although nowhere near to this extent, being directed towards Bush, McCain... not Romney, for some reason, however - he was never a serious contender to defeat Obama, since "it was time for a black president" and all that. (If he had won anyway you would have seen Mormon churches burn.)

I say "or 2032" because I do kinda expect the Uniparty to push for a controlled opposition candidate or two for the next few... decades. If they have any say in it, there will never be another Trump.
 
Last edited:
No, the creepy thing will be in 2028 or 2032 when another Republican runs or wins and instantly becomes just as hated, with just as much unhinged madness behind the eyes of the peacenik tribe.

I remember the same hatred, although nowhere near to this extent, being directed towards Bush, McCain... not Romney, for some reason, however - he was never a serious contender to defeat Obama, since "it was time for a black president" and all that. (If he had won anyway you would have seen Mormon churches burn.)

I say "or 2032" because I do kinda expect the Uniparty to push for a controlled opposition candidate or two for the next few... decades. If they have any say in it, there will never be another Trump.
Nah, Romney was hated. he was the vile misogynist with binders full of women who told Mexicans to self deport. Now he's liked for being a Quisling who stands up to Orange Man, though he apparently he has more of a survival instinct than Chrney by being awfully quiet about the fbi raid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back