Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

Would you rape Jess Phillips


  • Total voters
    2,412

Trump must win because he's the protagonist like luke skywalker. Fucking brainlet.
He surrounds a good argument talking about the situation in American politics with this retarded idea, feels like he just finished a book on philosophy and shit out a video using aspects from it so he can seem like an enlightened individual.
 

Trump must win because he's the protagonist like luke skywalker. Fucking brainlet.
Oh good god.

Spends the first minute giving possible legitimate reasons why someone might want Trump again, and reasons through the video why the current administration is fake and gay; only to go into "fuck it, we need Trump to follow the mythological story arc in fictional shit like star wars."

Does he realize he fucking sounds like the same soyjack retards going "OMG, this is just like {insert superhero movie here}!"

He surrounds a good argument talking about the situation in American politics with this retarded idea, feels like he just finished a book on philosophy and shit out a video using aspects from it so he can seem like an enlightened individual.
Hasn't that been one of the major issues with him? Whenever he reads something/decides something is right, he tries to fit everything within it, even if it might not be a perfect fit?
 
Hasn't that been one of the major issues with him? Whenever he reads something/decides something is right, he tries to fit everything within it, even if it might not be a perfect fit?

Pretty much yeah, if you watch the video he actually subtly contradicts himself at least once. His fondness for trump is more based on his antipathy to left wingers, which is a fucking retarded way to think.
 
feels like he just finished a book on philosophy and shit out a video using aspects from it so he can seem like an enlightened individual.
That is exactly how he wound up repping Da'esh/ISIS at one point:
This is a man who read a book on a long haul flight in 2017 and emerged at his destination repping Da'esh, only a couple of weeks after the London Bridge attack:
View attachment 2799716

Full vid.
He's always done that, though I'm doubtful that he ever read any John Locke books all the way through.
 
He surrounds a good argument talking about the situation in American politics with this retarded idea, feels like he just finished a book on philosophy and shit out a video using aspects from it so he can seem like an enlightened individual.
I am surprised he's still doing this on lotus eaters with a staff of people who should be shooting down script ideas when he falls into his old retarded ideas. Unless he's just hired fanboys and sycophants of course.

You know, I think I would actually legitimately cross the paywall to see all of the lotus eater staff and high profile guests minus Carl react to his unhinged 20 year plan/embarassing election loss video
 
I am surprised he's still doing this on lotus eaters with a staff of people who should be shooting down script ideas when he falls into his old retarded ideas. Unless he's just hired fanboys and sycophants of course.

You know, I think I would actually legitimately cross the paywall to see all of the lotus eater staff and high profile guests minus Carl react to his unhinged 20 year plan/embarassing election loss video

I've heard he's doing well so he has very little reason not too. His dumb little paypigs and low key influence on irl neckbeard politics means he's never going to stop hammering on about femminism, the 'elites' (well the ones he doesn't like) and black people in mass coosomer media.
I mean how often do talk radio hosts actually say something intelligent or stimulating mostly you just tune to have someone agree with you for a hour and that's sargon-talk radio for millennials and zoomers.
 
So Sargon had a debate with PSA Sitch and Adam Friended about liberalism on their channel a couple of days ago.


Now I know there's 50 different criticisms that one can give about liberalism. Especially from non-liberals like commies and fascists who don't support it and see it as cucked.

But Sargon seems to come off poorly within this argument, especially with stuff like trying to defend Academic Agent with "well, he has a PhD" (despite a couple of months ago, him scoffing at science and education), or SJW tactics like basically trying to mix definitions of 'equality of opportunity's with 'equality of outcome.'
But honestly, I'd say the worst was going "well, Adam wants to improve the material conditions of humans. That is also what commies say, ergo wanting to improve material conditions of human beings makes you a commie."
Setting aside the fact that "improving the material conditions of all human beings" is not what commies want (their 'improve material conditions' bit is only for the 'proletariat', not the 'bourgiouese' (and in reality, not even that)), Carl doing this kinda 'Hitler drank water' bit was so surreal, it felt like it came out of a Matt Bors comic or something.
Carl’s frame should be that they defend liberalism in theory while he critiques it in practice. Instead of letting them defend the concepts of fairness and open-mindedness in a vacuum

If I was debating a Nietzsche fanboy I wouldn’t let him pretend Nietzsche invented being strong or powerful.
 
I am surprised he's still doing this on lotus eaters with a staff of people who should be shooting down script ideas when he falls into his old retarded ideas. Unless he's just hired fanboys and sycophants of course.

You know, I think I would actually legitimately cross the paywall to see all of the lotus eater staff and high profile guests minus Carl react to his unhinged 20 year plan/embarassing election loss video
If Carl doesn't interfere with his content creators as much as it seems then its a small price to pay having to deal with the occassion garbage video he does to get a reasonable amount of creative freedom.
 
If Carl doesn't interfere with his content creators as much as it seems then its a small price to pay having to deal with the occassion garbage video he does to get a reasonable amount of creative freedom.
Occasional garbage video? He's just doing twis again, except he's paying someone to read and explain the whole article to him this time around and 2/3 of the screen time is no longer smug chuckling. It's infinitely more watchable, but it's still barrel scrapings
 
Okay I finished the Carl vs Adam and Stitch stream. And, I can’t believe I’m gonna say this, hold onto some railing or something… Carl is right. And I’ll try to explain his position better than his own words allowed.

He’s still a frustrated mush-mouth debater and you can see this right out of the gate. Apparently this debate is partly about a book that Adam and Stitch really misrepresented that Sargon was trying to make them see the point of. So he said “Liberals and Communists are basically the same, you both see improving the material conditions of everyone equally as the purpose of politics. Then Communists can always make a stronger emotional argument so they beat you.”

Unfortunately this last bit was talked over and he didn’t return to it. His central is correct though: liberals play nice with the radical left who then always take advantage of their agreeableness.

At this point the only liberal parties in the West are cuckservative parties who interpret Liberal Principles as a reason to essential refuse to govern or refuse to even block absurd legislative overreach (in the UK the Tories have basically a permanent majority but aren’t stopping a hugely unpopular Equality Act). So Liberalism is not a fair-minded system. It’s lopsided to the Left according to Carl and he made his case adequately. While they repeated propaganda about what Liberalism says of itself.

Adam and Stitch were also blatantly not listening to what he said at several points which is incredibly disrespectful of them. And ties into his thesis that they’re giant libtards.
 
Has he done a Why I Left the Left Lotus Eaters piece yet? There might be some behind the scenes stuff that's amusing.
Not that i know of. It seems like he’ll be making occasional appearances if I understand the situation.
 
Oh and Adam and Stitch say Liberalism beat Communism. But that isn’t strictly true. Western Europe and America were IMPERIAL PROJECTS as any Communist would tell you. They had a Liberal mythos about themselves but they were actually about themselves first and foremost. Only passing Civil Rights and the 1964 Immigration Act to impress the Third World because the Soviet Union basically said “America so white”.

And their solution, if it can be called that, is that Wokism will always be unprofitable so will lose. An extraordinarily cavalier position that hasn’t worked. The woke get two inches, and the lack of profits pushes them back one inch. A&S say this is victory.

They also just blame Neoliberalism for why Communism looks attractive. Even though America is absurdly rich and most of its problems come from immigrants/blacks (non-ironically)

And Stitch really prevaricated about censorship as if Kraut didn’t get raped to death by internet racists (then they got banned). He was honestly a real bitch incapable of being forthright. I feel bad for Sargon.
 
Last edited:
Back